Multi Sport
DA
And you're an old guy who likes to lie about his income. We could play this game all day...He’s a weirdo.
And you're an old guy who likes to lie about his income. We could play this game all day...He’s a weirdo.
What lies have I ever told about you? I've always been truthful and honest. Just because you are ashamed of what you posted doesn't make my fault. Maybe one day you'll grow a pair and come clean.
Ouch... coming from you that really tickles. Got anymore zingers or are you off to bed with the other old fart?Liar.
Ouch... coming from you that really tickles. Got anymore zingers or are you off to bed with the other old fart?
Another zinger... d.f.q.e.d.
"I, I know, way more than the generals"I know way more about it than you do, but thanks.
Zippy the pinhead come to life.Dude wtf are you talking about? You sound like a complete nutjob.
Don't be jealous of my income. Your mom and dad help you out, don't they?And you're an old guy who likes to lie about his income. We could play this game all day...
Huge news. The plaintiff could not prove that the defendant issued its utterances (challenging the "hockey stick" theory) knowing they were false and stated with an intent to injure the plaintiff's business or reputation and, in fact, did so.
Not exactly, but you dont really want to know the truth, do you?Huge news. The plaintiff could not prove that the defendant issued its utterances (challenging the "hockey stick" theory) knowing they were false and stated with an intent to injure the plaintiff's business or reputation and, in fact, did so.
If that doesn't prove that global warming isn't happening, then nothing does.
You idiot.
Huge news. The plaintiff could not prove that the defendant issued its utterances (challenging the "hockey stick" theory) knowing they were false and stated with an intent to injure the plaintiff's business or reputation and, in fact, did so.
If that doesn't prove that global warming isn't happening, then nothing does.
You idiot.
Not exactly, but you dont really want to know the truth, do you?
Huge news. The plaintiff could not prove that the defendant issued its utterances (challenging the "hockey stick" theory) knowing they were false and stated with an intent to injure the plaintiff's business or reputation and, in fact, did so.
If that doesn't prove that global warming isn't happening, then nothing does.
You idiot.
Nuances of the law are lost on plumbers (admittedly, my scientific finding is based on a sample of only 1, but it's something). The professional denial publicists, however, know what they can get away with. The loyal amateur denialists confirm their judgment.
Triggered. lol.
Triggered. lol.
Have a nice weekend suckers.
The weather is gonna be perfect.
Espola, you are really trying to convince that guy with scientists and data? That's so silly; he has a Canadian defamation case to prove otherwise! LOL.
Yes, exactly. So wrong again, cowboy.Not exactly, but you dont really want to know the truth, do you?
Jealous... of what? Your make believe income? Nice try Racist!Don't be jealous of my income. Your mom and dad help you out, don't they?
Hey look! It's the forum pussy!Zippy the pinhead come to life.
Jealous of their income.You mean the Walton family? Or the oil execs? Robber barons, that fits.