Climate and Weather

messy said:
Huge news. The plaintiff could not prove that the defendant issued its utterances (challenging the "hockey stick" theory) knowing they were false and stated with an intent to injure the plaintiff's business or reputation and, in fact, did so.
If that doesn't prove that global warming isn't happening, then nothing does.
You idiot.
Click to expand...
Not exactly, but you dont really want to know the truth, do you?
 
messy said:
Huge news. The plaintiff could not prove that the defendant issued its utterances (challenging the "hockey stick" theory) knowing they were false and stated with an intent to injure the plaintiff's business or reputation and, in fact, did so.
If that doesn't prove that global warming isn't happening, then nothing does.
You idiot.
Click to expand...

Nuances of the law are lost on plumbers (admittedly, my scientific finding is based on a sample of only 1, but it's something). The professional denial publicists, however, know what they can get away with. The loyal amateur denialists confirm their judgment.
 
messy said:
Huge news. The plaintiff could not prove that the defendant issued its utterances (challenging the "hockey stick" theory) knowing they were false and stated with an intent to injure the plaintiff's business or reputation and, in fact, did so.
If that doesn't prove that global warming isn't happening, then nothing does.
You idiot.
Click to expand...
espola said:
Nuances of the law are lost on plumbers (admittedly, my scientific finding is based on a sample of only 1, but it's something). The professional denial publicists, however, know what they can get away with. The loyal amateur denialists confirm their judgment.
Click to expand...
espola said:
Here is some truth for you --

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v4/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius
Click to expand...
Triggered. lol.
Have a nice weekend suckers.
The weather is gonna be perfect.
 
messy said:
Espola, you are really trying to convince that guy with scientists and data? That's so silly; he has a Canadian defamation case to prove otherwise! LOL.
And I don't care what he says about those new-fangled Japanese toilets...I'm a Kohler guy all the way.
Click to expand...

The Canadian court ruled that he didn't have a libel case just because the guy lied about him. The other case against Mark Steyn, who called him a child molester because he worked at Penn State, is still proceeding through the US courts.
 
espola said:
The Canadian court ruled that he didn't have a libel case just because the guy lied about him. The other case against Mark Steyn, who called him a child molester because he worked at Penn State, is still proceeding through the US courts.
Click to expand...
You just can’t handle the truth. The victory for the defense on the defamation claim proved there is no climate change. Ricky logic prevails.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top