Better team vs. more play time

If we leave we will leave on good terms, small world so we won’t burn any bridges.

So next year they move from 7v7 to 9v9, doubt that makes any difference, thought I would mention it.
If he is on 2014 now isn’t he playing 9v9 already? He should be.
 
No offense to your wife, but this mentality is what the big clubs prey on. IMHO this mentality can lead to burnout of your child in the long run. Talent doesn't ruin chances, but FOMO can ruin passion.

Dirty little secret. By the time kids reach 15-16 the truly passionate and talented kids are at least playing at an MLS Academy. Most (not all) of the other kids left playing for non-academy MLS Next and ECNL boys teams are passionate kids with average talent, because the other athletically gifted kids have moved on to other sports.
What about EA teams?
 
People say that a lot, but many, many kids end up going to D1 programs from non-academy MLS or ECNL teams. It depends a lot on the kid and the circumstances.
Which leagues are these kids playing in then if going to D1 if not not Academy MLS or ECNL ? Are they in EA leagues? Or other leagues?
 
Which leagues are these kids playing in then if going to D1 if not not Academy MLS or ECNL ? Are they in EA leagues? Or other leagues?
There is a guy on the UCLA roster from Fram fc. Farm is EA only. Fram is also local to UCLA and they probably know the kid growing up and know his quality. Maybe he was with a mls next academy and wanted to play high school. Who knows.

Football coaches talk about a player’s quality. Quality is a comparative measurement. A kid can look like Messi playing AYSO but you throw him among the EA players he looks average. Same thing could be said about an EA player when compared to ecnl and mls next academy players.
 
I know I'm late to the party and OP decided already.

And I'm not sure if I missed a post... but staying at the bigger club and moving down to his own age group could've been an option as well.

That way:
1) you get access to higher leagues as he ages up (ECNL, EA, MLS Next)
2) he should immediately get more playing time playing down to his age group I'd imagine

I know many posters mentioned going somewhere the kid can "have fun"... FUN = playing a lot, being integral part of the team, scoring goals :)
I guess the balance as parents is to try to push our kids in the most competitive settings as we can... while still retaining the fun...
OR forgoing a little bit of the fun now.... for more fun later...
 
Which leagues are these kids playing in then if going to D1 if not not Academy MLS or ECNL ? Are they in EA leagues? Or other leagues?
Go the webpages of the D1 programs you are interested in. Click on the Roster page; read the player Bios. The player Bios will almost always tell you what club they played with, and usually what league the club was participating in. You will quickly notice a trend in which Leagues the coaches are looking at, and which ones they are not.
 
Go the webpages of the D1 programs you are interested in. Click on the Roster page; read the player Bios. The player Bios will almost always tell you what club they played with, and usually what league the club was participating in. You will quickly notice a trend in which Leagues the coaches are looking at, and which ones they are not.
It tells you which leagues coaches were looking at in the past not where they're looking currently or in the future.

Current trends for girls are more from GA and more International players. More from GA is because 3-4 years ago GA didn't exist and now it does. More from International is because foreign Academy clubs are starting to put actual resources behind training female players.
 
Current trends for girls are more from GA and more International players. More from GA is because 3-4 years ago GA didn't exist and now it does. More from International is because foreign Academy clubs are starting to put actual resources behind training female players.

Uh, no. If that were the case, it would be straightforward to show how many GA D1 recruits vs. any of their competition recruits over the past few years. The trend is in the opposite direction. Though I guess if you compared to GA prior to it existing, there are almost certainly more GA recruits now than before it came to be.
 
Uh, no. If that were the case, it would be straightforward to show how many GA D1 recruits vs. any of their competition recruits over the past few years. The trend is in the opposite direction. Though I guess if you compared to GA prior to it existing, there are almost certainly more GA recruits now than before it came to be.
You're saying that there's less GA and International D1 recruits today than there was 3 years ago?
 
While GA makes it difficult to specifically define unless you're tracking all college commitments. Their site has a page where they put year over year commitment numbersish. (Sometimes showing actual numbers and other times showing percentages.)

At a high level they're trying to convey that the number of GA commitments is going up by 100 players per year starting with 400 in 2021.

 
You're saying that there's less GA and International D1 recruits today than there was 3 years ago?

No, I'm saying that GA had a fighting chance vs. ECNL 3 years ago in terms of percentages of D1 college recruits, and that is no longer the case. If international recruiting follows the mens model, there's no reason it wouldn't increase (vs. ECNL/GA/other) as well - but it's not like most people on this board can do anything to become an international recruit - though they most certainly can make league choices.
 
No, I'm saying that GA had a fighting chance vs. ECNL 3 years ago in terms of percentages of D1 college recruits, and that is no longer the case. If international recruiting follows the mens model, there's no reason it wouldn't increase (vs. ECNL/GA/other) as well - but it's not like most people on this board can do anything to become an international recruit - though they most certainly can make league choices.
Smells like an assumption.

Unfortunately I don't see any yoy data to confirm or refute.
 
We've done this a few times. Here's the math from one late last year. (link to post here). It's inaccurate for anyone to state that any league will guarantee a successful recruitment, but it's just as inaccurate to state that the chances are equivalent across the board. For whatever collection of reasons that can be hotly debated, those charged with recruiting players for D1 womens soccer show a strong preference for one league, judged only by the numbers (number of D1 recruits / number of players in league).
 
No, I'm saying that GA had a fighting chance vs. ECNL 3 years ago in terms of percentages of D1 college recruits, and that is no longer the case. If international recruiting follows the mens model, there's no reason it wouldn't increase (vs. ECNL/GA/other) as well - but it's not like most people on this board can do anything to become an international recruit - though they most certainly can make league choices.
Wasn't the DA still in the picture 3 years ago? Maybe it's been a little longer than that.
 
Wasn't the DA still in the picture 3 years ago? Maybe it's been a little longer than that.
DA (Developmental Academy) blew up in March 2020. This is why GA records start in 2021.

Keep in mind that for the first couple of years nobody knew if GA would make it. Because of this many players and clubs went over to girls ECNL.

Now that GA has proven that it's not going anywhere the numbers of commitments are going up because players don't feel like they need to go to ECNL to get noticed by recruiters.
 
Smells like an assumption.

Unfortunately I don't see any yoy data to confirm or refute.

OK - so data for recruiting #'s provided.

Now that GA has proven that it's not going anywhere the numbers of commitments are going up because players don't feel like they need to go to ECNL to get noticed by recruiters.

You're assuming what players & parents are thinking? Unfortunately I don't see any data to confirm or refute. Smells like an assumption.
 
You're assuming what players & parents are thinking? Unfortunately I don't see any data to confirm or refute. Smells like an assumption.

More GA clubs means a wider net. A wider net means more opportunities to have college/pro players come up from within the system. If top talent feels like GA is mature and able to highlight them to recruiters they won't switch leagues.

Above is not unreasonable to assume.
 
Back
Top