Bruddah IZ
DA
“Life, Liberty and the pursuit of all who threaten it”What is macho about saving some illegal alien robber or rapers life?
“Life, Liberty and the pursuit of all who threaten it”What is macho about saving some illegal alien robber or rapers life?
I says Kentucky.
Some of my ancestors made them.
( in Kentucky)
Go ahead......take the weapons ya fool.
Their ideology is more important.Go ahead......take the weapons ya fool.
![]()
How about this sick guy below, you going to " Outlaw " kitchen utensils too ?
![]()
It's not the Weapon that kills.....and I don't care how many " Lawyers " that
sue to get rid of Guns, if a sick individual wants to create harm they will.
As I've stated before....
It all starts with Parenting.
Wez and xyz, you guys have no clue what the REAL problem is !
Glad you agree that if we had fewer guns, we'd have fewer deaths. I assume you agree we shouldn't have bazookas.
The stereotypical rantings of a lunatic nutter.
clearly not true. no such thing as 500 murders without guns. we are just a gun-loving country, is all. there's no reason for it; it's not for our safety and it's not to fight tyranny, obvi, because there's so little (or none) of those benefits compared to the harm they do every day.That's a false statement. First you would have to have a parallel time frame to compare it to.
You cannot produce one so you have no basis in your argument to ban guns.
Second, banning guns will not stop murders. Chicago is just plain violent, without guns you would
have all sorts of other violent attacks that would total to the same 500 + murders Chicago has to
date this year....
You have no clue.clearly not true. no such thing as 500 murders without guns. we are just a gun-loving country, is all. there's no reason for it; it's not for our safety and it's not to fight tyranny, obvi, because there's so little (or none) of those benefits compared to the harm they do every day.
clearly not true. no such thing as 500 murders without guns. we are just a gun-loving country, is all. there's no reason for it; it's not for our safety and it's not to fight tyranny, obvi, because there's so little (or none) of those benefits compared to the harm they do every day.
No, he just doesn't imbibe in the same source of propaganda you consume so readily and swallow whole without any hesitation whatsoever.You have no clue.
Do you own guns?No, he just doesn't imbibe in the same source of propaganda you consume so readily and swallow whole without any hesitation whatsoever.
NADo you own guns?
NO, not answering, narcotics anonymous?
Have another pull off the old koolaid jug and get back in there Daffy!No, he just doesn't imbibe in the same source of propaganda you consume so readily and swallow whole without any hesitation whatsoever.
There were long guns being made in Kentucky at that time, although most were from Pennsylvania.Not in 1775.
Very few rifles were in use during the Revolution. Most of the infantry troops were armed with muskets and bayonets.
There were long guns being made in Kentucky at that time, although most were from Pennsylvania.
My ancestors didnt start making them until around 18oo, and if you can find one of them they are worth a fortune.
My point was that our private citizens developed a long, rifled barrel, that was superior to anything the british had, and it was a weapon anyone who could buy or build one could own.
I'll have to ask my great, great, great, great, great grandpappy and get back to you.What was the European population of Kentucky on April 19, 1775?
NO, not answering, narcotics anonymous?