An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

What was the European population of Kentucky on April 19, 1775?


Foreign Influences (1539 - 1730)

This period marks the end of an exclusively native history for Kentucky and the
beginning of one shared with Europeans. During
the mid-1500s, Spaniards appear in the form of
de Soto’s Expedition, which traveled through the
Southeast. Then, over a century later, during
the mid- to late 1600s, the French and the E
nglish appeared sporad
ically along Kentucky’s
extreme western and eastern borders. But there is
no record of European
s visiting or exploring
inside Kentucky’s borders until after the 1730s
. As time passed, however, the European
exploration and settlement zone
that encircled the state drew
closer to native communities.
For about the first 150 years of this period, na
tive peoples living in Kentucky were spared
the effects of direct contact with European
s that their northern, southern, and eastern
contemporaries had already experi
enced. Nevertheless, Kentucky’s
native groups had to contend
with the indirect impacts of th
e foreigners and the challenges t
hose impacts posed to their native
ways of life. These appear to have been experi
enced first within the realm of economics, then, in
the later decades of this period, th
rough disease and cultural disruption.
Native Cultures on the Eve of Recorded History
From the mid-1500s to the mid- to late
1600s, Kentucky’s native groups continued to
pursue their respective hunting-gathering-farmi
ng lifestyles very much like their immediate
ancestors had done. West of the
Falls lived the Caborn-Welborn pe
oples, and east of the Falls,
the Fort Ancient groups.
 
Foreign Influences (1539 - 1730)

This period marks the end of an exclusively native history for Kentucky and the
beginning of one shared with Europeans. During
the mid-1500s, Spaniards appear in the form of
de Soto’s Expedition, which traveled through the
Southeast. Then, over a century later, during
the mid- to late 1600s, the French and the E
nglish appeared sporad
ically along Kentucky’s
extreme western and eastern borders. But there is
no record of European
s visiting or exploring
inside Kentucky’s borders until after the 1730s
. As time passed, however, the European
exploration and settlement zone
that encircled the state drew
closer to native communities.
For about the first 150 years of this period, na
tive peoples living in Kentucky were spared
the effects of direct contact with European
s that their northern, southern, and eastern
contemporaries had already experi
enced. Nevertheless, Kentucky’s
native groups had to contend
with the indirect impacts of th
e foreigners and the challenges t
hose impacts posed to their native
ways of life. These appear to have been experi
enced first within the realm of economics, then, in
the later decades of this period, th
rough disease and cultural disruption.
Native Cultures on the Eve of Recorded History
From the mid-1500s to the mid- to late
1600s, Kentucky’s native groups continued to
pursue their respective hunting-gathering-farmi
ng lifestyles very much like their immediate
ancestors had done. West of the
Falls lived the Caborn-Welborn pe
oples, and east of the Falls,
the Fort Ancient groups.
My kin were among the very first "europeans" to "settle" Kentucky.
 
Glad you agree that if we had fewer guns, we'd have fewer deaths. I assume you agree we shouldn't have bazookas.
If parents would teach respect and educate their children we would have a lot less gun deaths...
If the folks who run the communities that have high unemployment, high drug use and high crime actually did something to improve the plight of those communities we would have less gun violence.
Wishing there were less guns is a waste of time, perhaps the time should be spent figuring out real solutions, cause the guns are here to stay, that's guarantied.
 
If parents would teach respect and educate their children we would have a lot less gun deaths...
If the folks who run the communities that have high unemployment, high drug use and high crime actually did something to improve the plight of those communities we would have less gun violence.
Wishing there were less guns is a waste of time, perhaps the time should be spent figuring out real solutions, cause the guns are here to stay, that's guarantied.
I pretty much agree. fighting the nra is like fighting city hall, Exxon or Philip Morris... of course columbine, aurora, Newtown, and several other communities that have seen mass shootings over the years aren't communities that fit your model. hence my previous post about being a gun-loving nation.
 
You don't need to be a lawyer and there's no argument. If we have less guns, we have fewer gun deaths. If you think we need them to fight tyranny, you're nuts. If you think the constitution says we can all own a bazooka without restriction, you're nuts again.
Wez knows that most of our gun deaths are suicide deaths. We discussed this at length some time ago based on a wiki link he posted. We have a mental health problem in this country. Less guns do not fix the mental health problem.
 
I pretty much agree. fighting the nra is like fighting city hall, Exxon or Philip Morris... of course columbine, aurora, Newtown, and several other communities that have seen mass shootings over the years aren't communities that fit your model. hence my previous post about being a gun-loving nation.
See US Constitution...

Regarding gun loving nation...that's part of raising kids responsibly & being aware of their mental health, practicing responsible gun ownership...gun safety, gun safes, gun inventory...
But if your hell bent on destruction, there are bombs, vehicles, planes, machetes and knifes, poison gas.....
 
Wez knows that most of our gun deaths are suicide deaths. We discussed this at length some time ago based on a wiki link he posted. We have a mental health problem in this country. Less guns do not fix the mental health problem.

Less guns means less gun deaths, period.
 
Back
Top