An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

nononono said:
Go ahead......take the weapons ya fool.

lidl-front.jpg


How about this sick guy below, you going to " Outlaw " kitchen utensils too ?

c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800.jpg


It's not the Weapon that kills.....and I don't care how many " Lawyers " that
sue to get rid of Guns, if a sick individual wants to create harm they will.
As I've stated before....

It all starts with Parenting.

Wez and xyz, you guys have no clue what the REAL problem is !
Click to expand...
Their ideology is more important.
 
xav10 said:
Glad you agree that if we had fewer guns, we'd have fewer deaths. I assume you agree we shouldn't have bazookas.
Click to expand...

That's a false statement. First you would have to have a parallel time frame to compare it to.
You cannot produce one so you have no basis in your argument to ban guns.
Second, banning guns will not stop murders. Chicago is just plain violent, without guns you would
have all sorts of other violent attacks that would total to the same 500 + murders Chicago has to
date this year....
 
You could leave a gun unattended for thousands of years and it would be perfectly harmless,
now when a human picks it up it becomes dangerous.
 
nononono said:
That's a false statement. First you would have to have a parallel time frame to compare it to.
You cannot produce one so you have no basis in your argument to ban guns.
Second, banning guns will not stop murders. Chicago is just plain violent, without guns you would
have all sorts of other violent attacks that would total to the same 500 + murders Chicago has to
date this year....
Click to expand...
clearly not true. no such thing as 500 murders without guns. we are just a gun-loving country, is all. there's no reason for it; it's not for our safety and it's not to fight tyranny, obvi, because there's so little (or none) of those benefits compared to the harm they do every day.
 
xav10 said:
clearly not true. no such thing as 500 murders without guns. we are just a gun-loving country, is all. there's no reason for it; it's not for our safety and it's not to fight tyranny, obvi, because there's so little (or none) of those benefits compared to the harm they do every day.
Click to expand...
You have no clue.
 
xav10 said:
clearly not true. no such thing as 500 murders without guns. we are just a gun-loving country, is all. there's no reason for it; it's not for our safety and it's not to fight tyranny, obvi, because there's so little (or none) of those benefits compared to the harm they do every day.
Click to expand...


Wrongo xyz....wrongo....

The guns don't kill.

That low income single parent/no parent youth's finger is what pulls the trigger in Chicago.

Parenting xyz....Parenting.

You are presenting a false argument. Only an audience that accepts twisted logic
will support your false argument.
 
espola said:
Not in 1775.
Click to expand...
There were long guns being made in Kentucky at that time, although most were from Pennsylvania.
My ancestors didnt start making them until around 18oo, and if you can find one of them they are worth a fortune.

My point was that our private citizens developed a long, rifled barrel, that was superior to anything the british had, and it was a weapon anyone who could buy or build one could own.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
There were long guns being made in Kentucky at that time, although most were from Pennsylvania.
My ancestors didnt start making them until around 18oo, and if you can find one of them they are worth a fortune.

My point was that our private citizens developed a long, rifled barrel, that was superior to anything the british had, and it was a weapon anyone who could buy or build one could own.
Click to expand...

What was the European population of Kentucky on April 19, 1775?
 
Sheriff Joe said:
NO, not answering, narcotics anonymous?
Click to expand...

I would venture to say it's now narcotics anonymous after the recent news that exposed the
Hypocrisy/Lies involving Barry ( Obama ) Soetoro's Presidential Library that is supposed to
be built on Chicago's South Side :

" Obama opened the door to the backlash when he appeared on a video at the foundation's
first public meeting last week and said flat-out that there would be no community
benefits agreement. "

He's feeling the heat ( Barry ) and that heat is traveling fast down thru his
supporters channels.....And this is just the very tip of the Ice Berg. Wait til
the " Community " is fed up with his shit and they exposed the " Down Low "
secrets that have been hidden in Pandora's box since 2006.....
 
espola said:
What was the European population of Kentucky on April 19, 1775?
Click to expand...


Foreign Influences (1539 - 1730)

This period marks the end of an exclusively native history for Kentucky and the
beginning of one shared with Europeans. During
the mid-1500s, Spaniards appear in the form of
de Soto’s Expedition, which traveled through the
Southeast. Then, over a century later, during
the mid- to late 1600s, the French and the E
nglish appeared sporad
ically along Kentucky’s
extreme western and eastern borders. But there is
no record of European
s visiting or exploring
inside Kentucky’s borders until after the 1730s
. As time passed, however, the European
exploration and settlement zone
that encircled the state drew
closer to native communities.
For about the first 150 years of this period, na
tive peoples living in Kentucky were spared
the effects of direct contact with European
s that their northern, southern, and eastern
contemporaries had already experi
enced. Nevertheless, Kentucky’s
native groups had to contend
with the indirect impacts of th
e foreigners and the challenges t
hose impacts posed to their native
ways of life. These appear to have been experi
enced first within the realm of economics, then, in
the later decades of this period, th
rough disease and cultural disruption.
Native Cultures on the Eve of Recorded History
From the mid-1500s to the mid- to late
1600s, Kentucky’s native groups continued to
pursue their respective hunting-gathering-farmi
ng lifestyles very much like their immediate
ancestors had done. West of the
Falls lived the Caborn-Welborn pe
oples, and east of the Falls,
the Fort Ancient groups.
 
nononono said:
Foreign Influences (1539 - 1730)

This period marks the end of an exclusively native history for Kentucky and the
beginning of one shared with Europeans. During
the mid-1500s, Spaniards appear in the form of
de Soto’s Expedition, which traveled through the
Southeast. Then, over a century later, during
the mid- to late 1600s, the French and the E
nglish appeared sporad
ically along Kentucky’s
extreme western and eastern borders. But there is
no record of European
s visiting or exploring
inside Kentucky’s borders until after the 1730s
. As time passed, however, the European
exploration and settlement zone
that encircled the state drew
closer to native communities.
For about the first 150 years of this period, na
tive peoples living in Kentucky were spared
the effects of direct contact with European
s that their northern, southern, and eastern
contemporaries had already experi
enced. Nevertheless, Kentucky’s
native groups had to contend
with the indirect impacts of th
e foreigners and the challenges t
hose impacts posed to their native
ways of life. These appear to have been experi
enced first within the realm of economics, then, in
the later decades of this period, th
rough disease and cultural disruption.
Native Cultures on the Eve of Recorded History
From the mid-1500s to the mid- to late
1600s, Kentucky’s native groups continued to
pursue their respective hunting-gathering-farmi
ng lifestyles very much like their immediate
ancestors had done. West of the
Falls lived the Caborn-Welborn pe
oples, and east of the Falls,
the Fort Ancient groups.
Click to expand...
My kin were among the very first "europeans" to "settle" Kentucky.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top