An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

7, 2018
New FBI stats counter the media's anti-gun culture war
By Joseph Smith
A liberal media "eager to find a tipping point in the gun debate" declare that Second Amendment-supporters "are losing the culture war against guns" and that gun sales are "plummeting" because "Americans don't buy gun control threats." But the FBI's new report on firearms background checks contradicts that media narrative.

Background checks for February 2018 reached the second-highest February level ever, even exceeding the February 2013 level reached after President Obama issued 23 executive orders on gun safety as a response to the Newton, Conn. shooting.

February 2018 background check numbers were exceeded only by February 2016, when Hillary Clinton, who had previously advocated "an Australian-style" "gun buyback," was the frontrunner for president. And February 2018 results were all but completed when President Trump made comments in a meeting with lawmakers that unnerved Second Amendment-supporters on the last day of the month.

Statistics on firearm background checks, it should be noted, "do not represent the number of firearms sold, as the FBI says, but are viewed as a proxy estimate for actual gun sales numbers.

The media campaign to promote new gun controls and demoralize Second Amendment-supporters has featured such recent headlines as:

  • "Conservatives are losing the culture war over guns"
  • "Trump gun slump: Sales plummet as Americans don't buy gun control threats"
  • "'Trump slump' for gun sales isn't reversing"
  • "Thanks To 'Trump Slump,' shops have more guns than buyers"
Peter Beinart's culture war column at theatlantic.com cites corporations cutting ties with the NRA, along with the CNN town hall booing of NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch, to make that case "Americans' attitudes" toward guns "are changing." Beinart may be describing the intent, rather than the result, of the media campaign:

Even when conservatives win elections and pass laws, they look at the trend among cultural elites – the media, Hollywood, universities, even corporations – and feel like they're losing.

But could it be the cultural elites who are losing? The FBI report also indicates that by the end of this year, there will have been more than 300 million background checks in the twenty years of record-keeping. Americans like firearms, and they like them more than ever, no matter what the cultural elites want us to think.

More inHome

World's smallest violin plays for illegals who are afraid to take food stamps



Elect Rick Saccone in Pennsylvania



Saudi crown prince shocks Islamists with bold moves in Egypt



Innovation in fast food industry making 'Fight for Fifteen' irrelevant



Thrashing around with a non-story on collusion, the press gets despicable

Two anecdotal accounts from recent gun shows illustrate another trend (emphasis added):

At a Tampa, FL gun show one vendor "estimated that only 10 percent of gun show shoppers were firearms aficionados. The rest, he said, are either newcomers or dabblers."

And at a Waukesha, WI gun show a vendor said "I think a lot of new buyers do come into the market as soon as it's in the news. They're going well maybe I should go get one before they ban them."

One could argue that the media culture war campaign is having the opposite effect of that intended: Alana Abramson at time.com writes that "membership in the NRA and gun rights groups across the country ... is spiking."

Abramson quotes the head of Georgia Gun Owners, who says, "As soon as anti-gun attacks started coming in on Twitter, Facebook, and in the media, we began to hear from people who didn't even own guns who wanted to join up or contribute out of solidarity in defense of the Second Amendment to the Constitution."

The head of the Nevada Firearms Coalition says: "Gun owners themselves weren't being demonized [after Las Vegas], ut after the Florida shooting, there was a definite push to demonize honest gun owners and to demonize the NRA. And I think that's what's provoked their response."

Describing the post-Florida increase in gun control activism, Abramson quotes an NRA board member who says:

We've never had this level of opposition before, not ever. It's a campaign of lies and distortion, but it's very well funded and they are playing on the sympathy factor of kids getting killed.

The time.com piece gives the last word to Shannon Watts, "the founderof Moms Demand Action," who, in another case of projection by the left, says of "the gun lobby" what really applies to the anti-gun movement:

They specialize in exploiting shooting tragedies
 

The 2nd Amendment Isn't About Hunting: It's About Self-Defense


Battle-Rev-War-domain.png


by AWR Hawkins10 Jan 201342

10 Jan, 2013 10 Jan, 2013
contributor-80x100-awrhawkins.png


When Gov. Cuomo argued against guns with magazines that hold 10 rounds on Jan. 9, he tried to justify it by saying, “No one hunts with an assault rifle. No one needs 10 rounds to kill a deer.”
Problem one: He’s wrong in the same way Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) was wrong when he said no one hunts with an AR-15. Tons of people hunt with these kinds of rifles.

Problem two: It isn’t about hunting — never has been, never will be.

The 2nd Amendment wasn’t given to us to protect our right to duck or deer hunt but to defend our lives and our property and to repel tyranny, period.

When the left twists the 2nd Amendment to make it about hunting, they do so to effectively cut all non-hunters out of the equation, which lessens the size of the opposition by lopping off those who own guns for other purposes (self-defense). And this also gives them grounds to limit guns and gun-types based on hunting applications.



However, this is a specious tactic at best, because the 2nd Amendment is not about hunting.

As the Supreme Court said in both their District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago decisions, “individual self defense is “the central component‘ of the Second Amendment Right.” (italics in original)

This is not an argument against hunting. It’s just a reminder that that’s not the reason the Founding Fathers wanted us to be armed.
Obvi.
 

The 2nd Amendment Isn't About Hunting: It's About Self-Defense

As usual, conservatives are driven by fear.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...re-differs-between-liberals-and-conservatives

What does all of this mean? Basically it accounts for why conservatives are more sensitive to threat or anxiety in the face of uncertainty, while liberals tend to be more open to new experiences. The study occured in London, with MRI's performed on students who defined themselves as liberal or conservative.
 
As usual, conservatives are driven by fear.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...re-differs-between-liberals-and-conservatives

What does all of this mean? Basically it accounts for why conservatives are more sensitive to threat or anxiety in the face of uncertainty, while liberals tend to be more open to new experiences. The study occured in London, with MRI's performed on students who defined themselves as liberal or conservative.
"As usual liberals are intolerant cowards"
 
Who doesn't welcome gays and legal aliens?
#youreafuckingliar

You wish, dipshit hate-monger...read below and then go fuck yourself.


But the party’s platform (pdf) this year has been derided by gay conservatives as the most anti-LGBT in history. Ahead of Thiel’s speech, here’s a reminder of what Republicans seek to do, according their platform:

Overturn the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision to legalize gay marriage in all 50 states.

Marriage is between “one man and one woman” (pg. 31), and Republicans “do not accept the Supreme Court’s redefinition of marriage and we urge its reversal, whether through judicial reconsideration or a constitutional amendment returning control over marriage to the states.”

Make it legal to discriminate against LGBT people.

“We oppose government discrimination against businesses or entities which decline to sell items or services to individuals for activities that go against their religious views about such activities” (pg. 32). That includes adoption agencies, and doctors, nurses, and other healthcare professionals (pg. 37) who “should not be forced to choose between following their faith and practicing their profession.”

Discourage gay couples from adopting children.

“Every child deserves a married mom and dad,” the platform says (pg. 31).

Force everyone to use the bathroom of their biological sex at birth.

Barack Obama and bureaucrats are trying to “impose a social and cultural revolution upon the American people by wrongly redefining sex discrimination to include sexual orientation or other categories” (pg. 35). Their “edict to the states concerning restrooms, locker rooms, and other facilities is at once illegal, dangerous, and ignores privacy issues.”
Make “conversion therapy” legal for minors.

“We support the right of parents to consent to medical treatment for their minor children,” (page 37) the platform says. That’s “an endorsement of the debunked psychological practice of ‘pray the gay away,’ ” Log Cabin Republicans, the gay conservative group, said.

This platform has incensed some long-time Republicans. In a letter to members after the draft platform appeared, Log Cabin president Gregory T. Angelo wrote “There’s no way to sugar-coat this: I’m mad as hell.”
 
You wish, dipshit hate-monger...read below and then go fuck yourself.


But the party’s platform (pdf) this year has been derided by gay conservatives as the most anti-LGBT in history. Ahead of Thiel’s speech, here’s a reminder of what Republicans seek to do, according their platform:

Overturn the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision to legalize gay marriage in all 50 states.

Marriage is between “one man and one woman” (pg. 31), and Republicans “do not accept the Supreme Court’s redefinition of marriage and we urge its reversal, whether through judicial reconsideration or a constitutional amendment returning control over marriage to the states.”

Make it legal to discriminate against LGBT people.

“We oppose government discrimination against businesses or entities which decline to sell items or services to individuals for activities that go against their religious views about such activities” (pg. 32). That includes adoption agencies, and doctors, nurses, and other healthcare professionals (pg. 37) who “should not be forced to choose between following their faith and practicing their profession.”

Discourage gay couples from adopting children.

“Every child deserves a married mom and dad,” the platform says (pg. 31).

Force everyone to use the bathroom of their biological sex at birth.

Barack Obama and bureaucrats are trying to “impose a social and cultural revolution upon the American people by wrongly redefining sex discrimination to include sexual orientation or other categories” (pg. 35). Their “edict to the states concerning restrooms, locker rooms, and other facilities is at once illegal, dangerous, and ignores privacy issues.”
Make “conversion therapy” legal for minors.

“We support the right of parents to consent to medical treatment for their minor children,” (page 37) the platform says. That’s “an endorsement of the debunked psychological practice of ‘pray the gay away,’ ” Log Cabin Republicans, the gay conservative group, said.

This platform has incensed some long-time Republicans. In a letter to members after the draft platform appeared, Log Cabin president Gregory T. Angelo wrote “There’s no way to sugar-coat this: I’m mad as hell.”
Getting a little emotional, are we?
Welcoming gays has nothing to do with being against gay marriage, gay parenting and keeping creeps out of the other sexes bathrooms.
Get a grip and quit lying.
Adam and Eve not x10 and Wez.
#fakeattorney
 
Getting a little emotional, are we?
Welcoming gays has nothing to do with being against gay marriage, gay parenting and keeping creeps out of the other sexes bathrooms.
Get a grip and quit lying.
Adam and Eve not x10 and Wez.
#fakeattorney
How does that fear feel? It is clear that you have all kinds of feelings in your loins when discussing homosexuality and you cover it with fear and hate. It’s all you ever post, almost, because of your obsession. Those of us who are heterosexual don’t worry about gays teaching or marrying or what-have-you. You worry about it a lot. We don’t wonder why.
 
Back
Top