Bruddah IZ
DA
#metoo
An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America
- Thread starter Wez
- Start date
Wez
DA
As usual, your reply misses the mark by a mile.
Wez
DA
These nutters are just speaking to themselves it appears...they're becoming increasingly more incoherent with each passing day...
Bruddah IZ
DA
When you argue in favor of guns and Trump, you’re gonna have a problem remaining coherent.
However, I do have an announcement. I find Lion, curmudgeonly as he may be, to be fairly bipartisan and to be secretly anti-Trump and very angry at the left for fucking things up so bad that Trump got elected.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Is that the problem? I just thought he was doing his own version of Tony Clifton, minus the musical talent.
Nonononono
PREMIER
It wasn't rhetorical.
Why are cars built to exceed the speed limit?
My views could send me to the guillotine.
Then you're one stupid fucking idiot...
Let me answer you then. No they don't need more than five rounds.
Now, tell me why cars are built to far exceed the speed limits?
That's a good boy, but watch your language.
Trying for a share of the dunce cap?
Fuck you Magoo...
Why do they build cars that far exceed the speed limit?
This is a thread about guns. Is that too hard a topic for you discuss in a rational way?
You weak piece of chicken shit...
Your line of reasoning goes out the window if you answer why cars are designed and built to exceed speed limits.
Last edited:
Sheriff Joe
DA
The 2nd Amendment Isn't About Hunting: It's About Self-Defense
by AWR Hawkins10 Jan 201342
10 Jan, 2013 10 Jan, 2013
When Gov. Cuomo argued against guns with magazines that hold 10 rounds on Jan. 9, he tried to justify it by saying, “No one hunts with an assault rifle. No one needs 10 rounds to kill a deer.”
Problem one: He’s wrong in the same way Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) was wrong when he said no one hunts with an AR-15. Tons of people hunt with these kinds of rifles.
Problem two: It isn’t about hunting — never has been, never will be.
The 2nd Amendment wasn’t given to us to protect our right to duck or deer hunt but to defend our lives and our property and to repel tyranny, period.
When the left twists the 2nd Amendment to make it about hunting, they do so to effectively cut all non-hunters out of the equation, which lessens the size of the opposition by lopping off those who own guns for other purposes (self-defense). And this also gives them grounds to limit guns and gun-types based on hunting applications.
However, this is a specious tactic at best, because the 2nd Amendment is not about hunting.
As the Supreme Court said in both their District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago decisions, “individual self defense is “the central component‘ of the Second Amendment Right.” (italics in original)
This is not an argument against hunting. It’s just a reminder that that’s not the reason the Founding Fathers wanted us to be armed.