An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America
- Thread starter Wez
- Start date
It wasn't rhetorical.
Why are cars built to exceed the speed limit?
My views could send me to the guillotine.
Then you're one stupid fucking idiot...
Let me answer you then. No they don't need more than five rounds.
Now, tell me why cars are built to far exceed the speed limits?
That's a good boy, but watch your language.
Trying for a share of the dunce cap?
Fuck you Magoo...
Why do they build cars that far exceed the speed limit?
This is a thread about guns. Is that too hard a topic for you discuss in a rational way?
You weak piece of chicken shit...
Your line of reasoning goes out the window if you answer why cars are designed and built to exceed speed limits.
Last edited:
Sheriff Joe
DA
The 2nd Amendment Isn't About Hunting: It's About Self-Defense
by AWR Hawkins10 Jan 201342
10 Jan, 2013 10 Jan, 2013
When Gov. Cuomo argued against guns with magazines that hold 10 rounds on Jan. 9, he tried to justify it by saying, “No one hunts with an assault rifle. No one needs 10 rounds to kill a deer.”
Problem one: He’s wrong in the same way Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) was wrong when he said no one hunts with an AR-15. Tons of people hunt with these kinds of rifles.
Problem two: It isn’t about hunting — never has been, never will be.
The 2nd Amendment wasn’t given to us to protect our right to duck or deer hunt but to defend our lives and our property and to repel tyranny, period.
When the left twists the 2nd Amendment to make it about hunting, they do so to effectively cut all non-hunters out of the equation, which lessens the size of the opposition by lopping off those who own guns for other purposes (self-defense). And this also gives them grounds to limit guns and gun-types based on hunting applications.
However, this is a specious tactic at best, because the 2nd Amendment is not about hunting.
As the Supreme Court said in both their District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago decisions, “individual self defense is “the central component‘ of the Second Amendment Right.” (italics in original)
This is not an argument against hunting. It’s just a reminder that that’s not the reason the Founding Fathers wanted us to be armed.
Apparently Tony Clifton calls out idiots, morons, and pc pussies
Multi Sport
DA
You should know by now that anything that disrupts their progressive, liberal agenda will be avoided like the plague. There is no common ground when it comes to political views, at least on this forum.
Wez will threaten you in hopes that you will forget what question you asked him.
E will avoid your question. Either that or he does a copy and paste but still avoids the question.
Rat.. well he normally answers in ASL so who knows what he's babbling about.
Xav goes all counselor and will answer in a roundabout way that only he and his fellow loons think is sufficient.
TD doesn't stick around long enough to answer the question.
Nonos answers are so long that the question gets lost.
The rest are not worth mentoning..
But this is still better then watching some reality TV show.
Bruddah IZ
DA
#kennisawGA
The 2nd Amendment Isn't About Hunting: It's About Self-Defense
by AWR Hawkins10 Jan 201342
10 Jan, 2013 10 Jan, 2013
When Gov. Cuomo argued against guns with magazines that hold 10 rounds on Jan. 9, he tried to justify it by saying, “No one hunts with an assault rifle. No one needs 10 rounds to kill a deer.”
Problem one: He’s wrong in the same way Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) was wrong when he said no one hunts with an AR-15. Tons of people hunt with these kinds of rifles.
Problem two: It isn’t about hunting — never has been, never will be.
The 2nd Amendment wasn’t given to us to protect our right to duck or deer hunt but to defend our lives and our property and to repel tyranny, period.
When the left twists the 2nd Amendment to make it about hunting, they do so to effectively cut all non-hunters out of the equation, which lessens the size of the opposition by lopping off those who own guns for other purposes (self-defense). And this also gives them grounds to limit guns and gun-types based on hunting applications.
However, this is a specious tactic at best, because the 2nd Amendment is not about hunting.
As the Supreme Court said in both their District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago decisions, “individual self defense is “the central component‘ of the Second Amendment Right.” (italics in original)
This is not an argument against hunting. It’s just a reminder that that’s not the reason the Founding Fathers wanted us to be armed.
What do you think is my "line of reasoning"?
Bruddah IZ
DA
I 2nd the motion for you to be NRRA Prez.
Lambchop
GOLD
Yep, you be sure to aim your gun at the tip of the missile or you just might miss.
You tell me Einstein...