An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

Lion Eyes said:
Exactly. They don't outlaw the car or truck or the suv. They hold the driver of the vehicle responsible.
There are many on the left that want to outlaw certain guns....because they are "inherently dangerous".
Click to expand...

We started outlawing dangerous and wasteful parts of personal vehicles in the 50's.
 
espola said:
You seem to be stuck in a groove lately, repeating the same 2 seconds of thought over and over. Tape a penny to your tonearm.
Click to expand...


I know.... have you noticed the assholes who attempt to claim car parts are like guns...
Trying to claim driving and gun ownership are priviliges...that is assinine, wouldn't you agree Magoo..?
I asked one of those pinheads what amendment covered driving, still no answer.
You have a great day espola....you're the smartest guy in the kitchen according to you.
 
Lion Eyes said:
I know.... have you noticed the assholes who attempt to claim car parts are like guns...
Trying to claim driving and gun ownership are priviliges...that is assinine, wouldn't you agree Magoo..?
I asked one of those pinheads what amendment covered driving, still no answer.
You have a great day espola....you're the smartest guy in the kitchen according to you.
Click to expand...

It was you that posted " They don't outlaw the car or truck or the suv". I pointed out that the government has used its authority in the past to make our vehicles safer. The point of contention doesn't have to be about car parts - how about baby toys? Or nuclear power plants?

And you are the one that keeps repeated the claim that I am the smartest guy in "the kitchen". I am certain that I am smarter than you - just look what you have been posting lately - but I wouldn't make that broad a claim.
 
espola said:
It was you that posted " They don't outlaw the car or truck or the suv". I pointed out that the government has used its authority in the past to make our vehicles safer. The point of contention doesn't have to be about car parts - how about baby toys? Or nuclear power plants?

And you are the one that keeps repeated the claim that I am the smartest guy in "the kitchen". I am certain that I am smarter than you - just look what you have been posting lately - but I wouldn't make that broad a claim.
Click to expand...
That's right, when a drunk driver kills someone, the government doesn't blame the vehicle he's driving for causing death.
They hold the drunk driver responsible. They don't outlaw the vehicle.
As oppose to the jerkoffs who blame the gun for killing people.
Hold the perpetrator responsible. Some want to outlaw the gun.
Yeah Magoo you are so f'n smart, some of your best information from Time Life books...maybe.
 
Lion Eyes said:
That's right, when a drunk driver kills someone, the government doesn't blame the vehicle he's driving for causing death.
They hold the drunk driver responsible. They don't outlaw the vehicle.
As oppose to the jerkoffs who blame the gun for killing people.
Hold the perpetrator responsible. Some want to outlaw the gun.
Yeah Magoo you are so f'n smart, some of your best information from Time Life books...maybe.
Click to expand...

...and... the Government has taken several steps, just in my paltry little lifetime, to reduce the number of people that are killed by vehicles by accident or intent.
 
Lion Eyes said:
That's right, when a drunk driver kills someone, the government doesn't blame the vehicle he's driving for causing death.
They hold the drunk driver responsible. They don't outlaw the vehicle.
Click to expand...

a38b8acc85edd32fff069a014ada0900.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top