You may find if fishy, but the one I know is absolutely true!
Stanford was recruiting a former teammate of my DDs and I know for a fact Stanford's minimum GPA requirement is 3.50 without test scores. Another buddy I know DD's was also being recruited by Stanford and he told me the same. Every player is different, let's say hypothetically a player has the minimum 3.50 GPA, but still hasn't scored the minimum on the SAT/ACT for Stanford's admissions approval. The player keeps taking the test to meet the min. requirement until the admissions deadline. Waiting pins and needles hoping the last test score meets minimum admissions requirement, only to be disappointed that it didn't"
Without further clarification, this qulaifies as one of the most useless posts of this, or the previous, forums.
Please enlighten us with your insight.
When you show your level of intellect right off the first post and attack another person (who you don't know by the way) engaged in discussion, your opinion becomes irrelevant. In order to have meaningful discussion don't insult another person next time sport. This forum is rife with online cyber warriors isn't it?
I may or may not have some personal experience here. I could truly care less if you are incapable of understanding the difference college socially, college academically, long term professionally of playing at Stanford vs an Ivy. I could truly care less if you are incapable of understanding the time and travel commitments of playing at Stanford vs and Ivy and the mental, physical, academic toll it takes on that athlete at Stanford. All that shows me is that you don't understand any nuance of what I am suggesting and/or lack the ability to view anything from a different perspective and I don't intend on spending my Sunday morning enlightening you.