5 biological men roster wins Australian women's soccer league title & also undefeated this season
- Thread starter Veritas
- Start date
Strawman. If you actually believe parents making a good faith decision about their child's serious health issue is the same as parents prostituting their child, then you fundamentally don't understand the issue. I agree with guardrails, in fact, I mentioned specific protocols for transitioning. Nothing in my posts supported unrestricted transitioning.
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
If you would have ended with, “Not all transgenders are what you see on TV.” I would have agreed with your full post. But you ended with, “So until we walk in someone else's shoes, we probably shouldn't tell others how to raise their kids.” I addressed that - not to imply that you somehow didn’t think guardrails should exist (and I state that they were previously referenced) - but to make the point that the transitioning process in the current state of our country w.r.t. doctors and education (add science research and MSM narrative) is unsafe for children who will eventually not be trans. Unfortunately, the corruption of the “experts” keeps parents from being well informed. As it stands now, we need more guardrails.
Transitioning under 18? That’s a hard no in my book. After that, it’s your choice, but let’s be real... if you go down that path, there’s likely something deeper going on mentally. Why not embrace what the universe or God gave you? If you're attracted to the same sex, fine then you’re gay. Gay people don’t feel the need to change their biology because they accept who they are and stay grounded in reality. But transitioning? That’s a whole different level of trying to override the hand you were dealt with technology and science. It feels like a refusal to confront reality, wrapped in entitlement. And don’t even get me started on those who transition only to date the same sex. A man becoming a woman to date another woman? That’s next-level confusion. It screams of deeper issues that need addressing, not a quick fix through surgery and hormones...
I don’t like the override the hand you were dealt with/technology argument. That’s an argument for people not to get lasik, not to fix the deaf and blind if surgical options or artificial are available, to ban adhd meds, to not repair cleft palates or do plastic surgery, hgh, tattoos, liposuction of semiglutides, vasectomies and tube tying, artificial limbs and robotic replacements. The only distinction would seem to be you think all or some of these options are morally legit but transitioning is not caused by a legit medical concern so is just “a refusal to confront reality” followed up with the other moral pronouncement “wrapped in entitlement”. I note just a few years ago you could turn the gay argument on its head: God made you a man so why are you unnaturally attracted to other men. The only difference is you now accept one (gayness) as moral and natural but not the other. Again it boils down to in the end you are making a moral judgment call.Transitioning under 18? That’s a hard no in my book. After that, it’s your choice, but let’s be real... if you go down that path, there’s likely something deeper going on mentally. Why not embrace what the universe or God gave you? If you're attracted to the same sex, fine then you’re gay. Gay people don’t feel the need to change their biology because they accept who they are and stay grounded in reality. But transitioning? That’s a whole different level of trying to override the hand you were dealt with technology and science. It feels like a refusal to confront reality, wrapped in entitlement. And don’t even get me started on those who transition only to date the same sex. A man becoming a woman to date another woman? That’s next-level confusion. It screams of deeper issues that need addressing, not a quick fix through surgery and hormones...
The best argument against transitioning under 18 is the consent argument. That the change is so fundamental a minor is incapable of making it and a parent should not. That assumes however there is a line of certain medical procedures over which we collectively believe the state and not the parent should make a decision (such as killing your child). But note such a policy does do active harm to people like that watfly illustrated. You are protecting some at the expense of others. It also concedes that a parent is not ultimate authority and the state can override a parent (say ca at one point considered screening kids for lgbtq and removing them from parents who might disagree).
As to men transitioning and then dating other men, the thing to understand is that not everyone thrown into the transgendered category is the same and therefore probably needs to be treated differently (progs did this to themselves). We have people who know from a very early age (like watfly’s person), people who know from a young age (most often associated with an autism link), people who transition later (tend to be males and straight and may or may not have autogynophelia link), cross dressers (both who may want to take the fantasy to an extreme and then regret it and most often associated with ocd and fetishers with no interest in transitioning), drag (gay men, usually for entertainment), and the nonbinary (overwhelmingly female).
Grace, you raise a valid critique about drawing lines between medical interventions. Yes, technology and medicine can enhance lives such as lasik, cleft palate repairs, or prosthetics are excellent examples. But the difference lies in purpose and permanence. You see Grace, most of these interventions aim to restore or enhance function, not redefine identity. Transitioning isn’t about fixing a broken limb or improving vision...it’s a fundamental alteration of one's biological and social reality. That distinction makes it a heavier moral and medical question.
The consent argument for minors is critical. The stakes are enormous, and a child lacks the maturity to fully grasp the lifelong implications of transitioning. As you pointed out, we already place limits on parental authority in extreme cases. While those policies can protect, they also risk overreach, as seen in debates like California’s proposals on LGBTQ+ screenings. It’s a balancing act, protecting minors while preserving parental rights and avoiding harm to those who might genuinely benefit.
On men transitioning and dating other men, I agree with your point about nuance. The transgender umbrella encompasses diverse motivations and experiences, and not all align with a single narrative. However, understanding these complexities shouldn’t prevent us from discussing overarching issues like medical ethics, mental health, and societal norms. The key is balancing compassion with common sense ensuring decisions are well-informed, reversible where possible, and grounded in both personal freedom and responsibility.
Well, at least we got to the heart of it. Your objection is a moral one. You approve of some medical interventions, you don't approve of others. You also think it's a question of "identity" whereas medically, at least for some category of the individuals we outlined, it's not. It's one prescription which for a category of people...like Brianna Wu, my counsin, or Watfly's person...where the treatment has helped because there's no better treatment available (for the second category, for example, we can't cure or even treat autism). Again, there's no magic wand that makes a ftm magically male or a mtf magically female...it's a medical intervention among very limited medical interventions and a poor solution. There's not a whole lot of alternatives here besides shrugging your shoulders and saying so sad too bad.
In rare cases, the hand they were dealt is their brain biology says they are the gender opposite of their physical biology. Yes, transitioning prior to 18 is super dicey and there should be multiple safeguards before it is ever considered. But sincere and genuine transgenders are going to have better outcomes if they don't go through puberty of their birth gender. Surgical transition as a minor is far more of myth than a reality.Transitioning under 18? That’s a hard no in my book. After that, it’s your choice, but let’s be real... if you go down that path, there’s likely something deeper going on mentally. Why not embrace what the universe or God gave you? If you're attracted to the same sex, fine then you’re gay. Gay people don’t feel the need to change their biology because they accept who they are and stay grounded in reality. But transitioning? That’s a whole different level of trying to override the hand you were dealt with technology and science. It feels like a refusal to confront reality, wrapped in entitlement. And don’t even get me started on those who transition only to date the same sex. A man becoming a woman to date another woman? That’s next-level confusion. It screams of deeper issues that need addressing, not a quick fix through surgery and hormones...
I agree that in many cases there may be some underlying mental issues, but my son's friend has convinced me that that's not true in all cases. So I will take a real life experience over the made for TV transgenders like Dylan Mulvaney who, in my mind, appears to be play acting. I strongly believe that if you stood in the shoes of my son's friend's parents your opinion would be different. What you describe in your post in no way applies to my son's friend, and is more about what you're seeing on TV and social media.
The other issue with minors is hormone blockers and hormone therapy. Reason Europe has clamped down is because both have been found to have some side effects including permanent effects on fertility. While surgical transition is rare with minors, the foregoing therapies have become more common and the guardrails that were in place since the 60s were eroded during the Obama years by activists, but I otherwise agree with your statement. The problem is your son's friend has been lopped in with all others as "transgendered" including those who "self-ID" and/or are really just exercising a fetish. The activists did that to your friend's kid, which isn't very fair.
Agree on all accounts. I take everything on a case-by-case basis. There is definitely "lumping" in the TG community, like if you're a TG supporter you have to also support FtoM's competing against women. I don't understand people that follow strict narratives where if you believe X you must believe Y.
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
I can't imagine a scenario where I would say, "transition my child". But I am also not so arrogant to believe I have all the answers or even that it's not possible for me to feel that way. My experience is anecdotal - and may not reflect reality. But I feel like, maybe 10-15 years ago, it was a much better time for children in a position that @watfly references. Transitioning seemed like a private decision between a patient/family and doctor to help alleviate suffering that persisted despite more traditional therapy. It was not celebrated and didn't come with new privileges because that wasn't the point. In fact, I hardly ever heard about it.
Yes, the consent argument is likely to bring child transitions to a screeching halt. There's nothing like lawsuits to deter an activity.
GraceT touched on this...there is a certain activism involved in this issue that didn't exist 10-15 years ago. This combined with the medical communities default treatment of "here take this" adds to what may be an "over-transitioning" issue. I'm no expert but it appears to me there are a huge number of variables that cause someone to think they are the opposite gender and they all should be treated differently.
The men who want to be a gurl cannot play sports with the girls and against the girls. Let's stay on topic watty. They & Them cannot be allowed in the locker rooms or showers with our daughters, the end!
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
Related, but “downstream” issue w.r.t. the act of transitioning children.
I hear you bro, but I'm staying upstream. When did Lia transition to girl? U of Penn is freaking mess!!!
Fake girl swimmer 6' 1"
Real Girl Swimmer, 5' 9"
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
We can’t overestimate the effect of celebrating sexual preference and gender on the minds of children - and adults for that matter. The only time in life that this matters is when people are in that type of relationship. Why are schools and activists pushing this on children? Affirmation sickness? It’s so weird that we rightly pushed sexual harassment out of the ADULT workplace, yet we feel the need to expose young children to it and teach them to celebrate it.
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
My position here is that if you’re a male (XY chromosomes), you don’t play women’s sports.
That's my position as well. They & Them are trying to normalize this kind of cheating and it's been going on for a very long time. Were only seeing it front and center because the light has been turned on for all to see. Just wait when we ALL find out who's been acting the part of a female in politics, hollywood and in sports. Oh boy, people will be shocked but not me.
Coach from SC Girls team and I quote, "If you consider yourself a woman and you want to play sports, or vice versa, you should be able to play". She made these comments in a news conference before the team's NCAA Tournament championship game against Iowa
The leader of the movement in girls' soccer, 'I consider them to be women' Megan Rapinoe
The key word is, "Consider." Well, consider this, you're insane or bought, bribed and or blackmailed and you best STFU or no college for your kid.
I don't know you personally K & S and I'm sure your dd is a girl and is playing soccer somewhere. Imagine a world where she plays at the highest level and has a chance to make the WNT, but a dude takes her spot instead because They & Them consider the man to be a girl just because. That's my issue in all of this.
She's probably Trans herself... would not be surprised. All these woke coaches need to go. Good bye. TRUMP 2025 the future looks bright. He's going to clean all of this madness
It's a modern gift to be able to medically transition. IMO for a MTF to compete against women is an abuse of that gift.