Chelsea dad g09
SILVER
And this is why we laugh at both of you.He just asked leading questions. Is that what the Steele dossier did?
And this is why we laugh at both of you.He just asked leading questions. Is that what the Steele dossier did?
They could be telling me they now see the light and now know how bad Trump I’d and I wouldn’t know. I only breeze over the idiot posts and rarely go back through unseen pages. That would be a waste of time. I do notice there are some highly triggered individuals in here. “If you can’t dispute the message . . .” *I'm speaking to you because your response to his question made no sense.
HahahahahahahaThey could be telling me they now see the light and now know how bad Trump I’d and I wouldn’t know. I only breeze over the idiot posts and rarely go back through unseen pages. That would be a waste of time. I do notice there are some highly triggered individuals in here. “If you can’t dispute the message . . .” *
* they won’t know how that saying ends.
Dude that's so weak. You strum on about Republicans having no accountability. Believing everything they're told and so on and so on. When you do the dame and get called out, "that would be a waste of time."They could be telling me they now see the light and now know how bad Trump I’d and I wouldn’t know. I only breeze over the idiot posts and rarely go back through unseen pages. That would be a waste of time. I do notice there are some highly triggered individuals in here. “If you can’t dispute the message . . .” *
* they won’t know how that saying ends.
What is his obvious answer to the first question?He obviously thinks he knows the answer to his own question, I want to hear his response with facts, not opinion.
Responding is not ignoring.Dude that's so weak. You strum on about Republicans having no accountability. Believing everything they're told and so on and so on. When you do the dame and get called out, "that would be a waste of time."
You claim people are triggered but how many posts do you make per day about a single grown man? You dont find that odd?
This is why we laugh at you and now I see why everyone ignores you and espola.
Kick rocks. You already said he asked a leading question.What is his obvious answer to the first question?
Question: If Donald Trump were compromised by Vladimir Putin, how would he act any differently than he does now?
So because youre in my comments, when is the last time he responded to me?Responding is not ignoring.
The question in question is not a leading question.Kick rocks. You already said he asked a leading question.
I dont believe he is so how would he act any different? Then im going to come back with, show me proof hes compromised, not just your opinion.The question in question is not a leading question.
Question: If Donald Trump were compromised by Vladimir Putin, how would he act any differently than he does now?
Ah, the "no true Scotsman" argument.I dont believe he is so how would he act any different? Then im going to come back with, show me proof hes compromised, not just your opinion.
You've tried this one before also, and like before it holds no weight. Like your boy husker claims, you are attacking the messenger, not the message.
Your entire argument is based on fantasy. Your opinion is hes compromised but offer no factual evidence and then your argument when asked to provide evidence is to ask the same completely hypothetical question. Its unknown unknowns and is completely anecdotal and a logical fallacy.
Are you denying that he has made any action that would be consistenrt with him being Putin's puppet?You've tried this one before also, and like before it holds no weight. Like your boy husker claims, you are attacking the messenger, not the message.
Both of you post your opinions as fact and when someone doesn't agree with your opinion then they are wrong and met with insults. You're not making an argument based on facts so there is no way to have a discussion. This isnt an appeal to the stone because there are no facts its petito principii.
Lay out proven facts showing hes compromised and an argument could be made, until then its just your opinion vs mine.
Again there you go asserting your opinions as fact.Are you denying that he has made any action that would be consistenrt with him being Putin's puppet?
The question was "consistent with him being Putin's puppet".Again there you go asserting your opinions as fact.
Do I agree with him buying oil from Russia,no. Does that make him putins puppet or mean hes compromised, I dont believe so because much like you, there is no proof either way.
Would you say obama was putins puppet?
Here we go again. Just stop dude, youre dealing with your opinions.The question was "consistent with him being Putin's puppet".
Let us start with the denial of American intelligence sources and accepting Putin's word about Russian interference. Is that consistent?
Is cancelling the constraints on trade with Russia consistent?
What did Obama do?
Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck . . .The question was "consistent with him being Putin's puppet".
Let us start with the denial of American intelligence sources and accepting Putin's word about Russian interference. Is that consistent?
Is cancelling the constraints on trade with Russia consistent?
What did Obama do?
Interesting. So that would make a grown man that constantly posts about another man a . . .Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck . . .