Girl's Dad to Youth Referee, "I'll give you one word of advice..."

Watch this clip:

Let's say the referee did say or do something that would be considered Misconduct by a Referee. This dad, whether justified or not, accomplished the precise opposite of what is needed. Instead of reporting the referee, he threatened the referee, made it on to social media where most people find his action disgraceful. Had he reported the referee, there would have been an opportunity for the referee to be corrected. Now the referee will either quit or decide that "all parents are crazy, complainers, sore losers,..."

From US Soccer Policy 531-10 | Misconduct of Game Officials ("of" in this policy is "by")
(A) When any game official is accused of having committed misconduct toward another game official, participant, or spectator at a match,..., the original jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter shall vest immediately in the State Association or Organization Member through which the accused game official is registered.

(C) Any allegation of misconduct... by a game official..., or of unethical conduct, misuse or abuse of authority..., shall be made in writing to the State Referee Administrator or to the State Association(s) or Organization Member....

Now, you may say nothing will happen, well this past week we received such a report. The referee was immediately suspended until the hearing, at which time the penalty will be determined; the referee will have the right to an appeal. This is the exact same procedure for Abuse of a Referee.

SOLUTION:
  • Please do not complain, dissent, threaten referees before, during or after a game, especially youth refs.
  • If the referee is accused of Misconduct, report it.
  • If you are unhappy with performance of the referee, inform your coach, manager, or DOC. The DOC has the option of contacting the Referee Assignor or the State Referee Committee.
 
I'm confused by a few points above; perhaps you can clarify.

You say the ref suspension/appeal process is the same as it would be for accusations of abuse, but parents have been told explicitly that if an official feels you dissented, the parent can be carded, and the parent (and possibly the kid) will be suspended for some period of time (per SoCal league rules). There's no mention of, or reference to, any hearing or appeal process in that direction. Does this means there is no hearing or appeal process for the official, or do you mean something else by "exact same procedure for Abuse of a Referee".

When you say inform your coach or manager, what do you think they are able to do? I can't speak for the DOC, but I can tell you there's no general mechanism for a team manager to report anything re referee performance and/or bias, and I believe that's the same for coaches. Similarly, the messaging from our club is do not saying anything, no matter how overtly terrible the calls are (and implicitly: just teach the kids that the refs are sometimes just biased and/or terrible, and US Soccer had decided to just punish anyone who complains about it).

I'm willing to take your word that there are some official channels somewhere which might, in some small number of cases nation-wide, result in some improvements in officiating (and/or maybe punitive action for the most egregious cases). I'm just not aware of them, and they are certainly not publicized well. The above feels like a bit of a hedge against the near-ubiquitous observation that the new abuse rules are entirely one-sided, but it doesn't seem overly convincing on first read, fwiw.

Related aside: I'm starting to see cards for kids who say things about calls on the field, so the new policy is certainly ramping up. We had a player say something like "that's a terrible call" to himself (after a bad call, which of course happens), and pick up a yellow cause the ref heard it, and there have been a few cards issued to that effect in the last couple of weeks. Players are going to have to adjust to keep their disgust and frustration from being vocalized, at least on the field.
 
The real-world answer is to develop a relationship with the handful of ref assignors in the area. Usually they cover multiple clubs, so in a place as large as the bay area - it's really only a handful of people. When a ref is "terrible", for whatever reason, you call the assignor and let them know the ref is terrible, and ask them what they can do so the ref doesn't show up at another one of your games. Usually that's all it ever takes. Sometimes they are interested in video showing what you mean. The assignor doesn't want to put terrible refs in front of teams that they've already embarrassed themselves at - it's easier and less stress for them not to.
 
I'm confused by a few points above; perhaps you can clarify.

You say the ref suspension/appeal process is the same as it would be for accusations of abuse, but parents have been told explicitly that if an official feels you dissented, the parent can be carded, and the parent (and possibly the kid) will be suspended for some period of time (per SoCal league rules). There's no mention of, or reference to, any hearing or appeal process in that direction. Does this means there is no hearing or appeal process for the official, or do you mean something else by "exact same procedure for Abuse of a Referee".

When you say inform your coach or manager, what do you think they are able to do? I can't speak for the DOC, but I can tell you there's no general mechanism for a team manager to report anything re referee performance and/or bias, and I believe that's the same for coaches. Similarly, the messaging from our club is do not saying anything, no matter how overtly terrible the calls are (and implicitly: just teach the kids that the refs are sometimes just biased and/or terrible, and US Soccer had decided to just punish anyone who complains about it).

I'm willing to take your word that there are some official channels somewhere which might, in some small number of cases nation-wide, result in some improvements in officiating (and/or maybe punitive action for the most egregious cases). I'm just not aware of them, and they are certainly not publicized well. The above feels like a bit of a hedge against the near-ubiquitous observation that the new abuse rules are entirely one-sided, but it doesn't seem overly convincing on first read, fwiw.

Related aside: I'm starting to see cards for kids who say things about calls on the field, so the new policy is certainly ramping up. We had a player say something like "that's a terrible call" to himself (after a bad call, which of course happens), and pick up a yellow cause the ref heard it, and there have been a few cards issued to that effect in the last couple of weeks. Players are going to have to adjust to keep their disgust and frustration from being vocalized, at least on the field.

Read US Policy 531-9 and Misconduct Toward Game Officials 531-10 Misconduct of Game Officials, both include the reporting, penalties and appeals: https://ussoccer.app.box.com/s/d17mtf22sltr4k8r7513970c13almooo

We have held webinars for the referees, leagues, and the entire Southern CA soccer community. You can find information at this link, included is the recorded webinar and the presentation: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LsdRbR1IqWLh9oJtN9SWalIcVwtAyegJ?usp=drive_link

Once you are done looking this over, please take the survey, it asks for advice from the soccer community: https://forms.gle/F4ogKgkuC9pvGVRK8

Some day a player, parent or coach from your team or club will be a referee. How should they be treated?
 
The real-world answer is to develop a relationship with the handful of ref assignors in the area. Usually they cover multiple clubs, so in a place as large as the bay area - it's really only a handful of people. When a ref is "terrible", for whatever reason, you call the assignor and let them know the ref is terrible, and ask them what they can do so the ref doesn't show up at another one of your games. Usually that's all it ever takes. Sometimes they are interested in video showing what you mean. The assignor doesn't want to put terrible refs in front of teams that they've already embarrassed themselves at - it's easier and less stress for them not to.

thanks, I agree with you, assignors want to schedule the correct referees. At this moment in time we have a referee shortage and assignors are lucky to assign all their games and slots.

In Southern CA we have a process. Parent, Player, Spectator > Coach > Director of Coaches > Assignor or State Referee Director of Assessments.
 
Some day a player, parent or coach from your team or club will be a referee. How should they be treated?
I was a FIFA certified referee for ~10 years growing up (mostly as a teenager), so I'm familiar with the other side of the issue already, personally.

The best approach I found (while officiating AYSO games; admittedly not as competitive as club matches) was to communicate directly with coaches when there were aggressive questions about calls, and/or significant issues with spectator harassment. I found that spending 30 seconds on the sideline in a constructive conversation, which might include reminders that I can only call based on what I see, usually worked vastly better than escalating confrontation (with cards, etc.) which might impact players or coaches in future matches. It turned out that most people basically just wanted to be heard, and all coaches (in my recollection) were helpful partners in resolving spectator and/or player abuse, as long as I was not just ignoring their concerns and just carding them confrontationally.

That said, I don't know if that would work as well at the club level; coaches and officials seem to be less collaborative at this level, and more de facto confrontational, at least in some cases.

Fwiw, I certainly took a good amount of verbal abuse in my time as an official. It doesn't bother me too much, but I wouldn't want to see that escalate certainly. I don't personally see much issue with people/players griping about calls, as long as the confrontations do not escalate (and I would accept more complaints for less escalation), but that's just my opinion, and as noted is the opposite of the direction that US Soccer is moving in. I think call complaints and frustrations are distinct from actual referee abuse, though; I would tolerate the former, but not the latter.
 
Also, related to the original video: it's hard to make a judgement without context, but it sounds like the parent had an issue with something the teenager said to his daughter directly, unrelated to the game calls or context. While he (and his daughter) could be punished by US Soccer under the new rules, since the person he was talking at was an referee, my guess purely based on the interaction would be that he made a lewd comment, the father was upset about it, and he waited until after the game to voice his frustration. Also, the teenage boy didn't seem overly shocked at or bothered by the accusation either, so maybe not an isolated incident either.

Again, though: lots of speculation, and hard for me to make a judgement without context there, but that was my reaction/take.
 
thanks, I agree with you, assignors want to schedule the correct referees. At this moment in time we have a referee shortage and assignors are lucky to assign all their games and slots.

In Southern CA we have a process. Parent, Player, Spectator > Coach > Director of Coaches > Assignor or State Referee Director of Assessments.
He specializes in imagining extreme examples and then extrapolating horrible situations that he claims will result. He has no interest in actually understanding the rule or seeing it implemented. He wants to be right and to prove everyone in power is wrong, because there's no one else who is as smart as him. He is one of the WORST people you could ever meet at dispute resolution, and his preposterous vignettes about "talking it out" with the complaining parents/coaches are the exact opposite of what really happens when he "has a discussion" about ref calls.
 
Watch this clip:

Let's say the referee did say or do something that would be considered Misconduct by a Referee. This dad, whether justified or not, accomplished the precise opposite of what is needed. Instead of reporting the referee, he threatened the referee, made it on to social media where most people find his action disgraceful. Had he reported the referee, there would have been an opportunity for the referee to be corrected. Now the referee will either quit or decide that "all parents are crazy, complainers, sore losers,..."

From US Soccer Policy 531-10 | Misconduct of Game Officials ("of" in this policy is "by")
(A) When any game official is accused of having committed misconduct toward another game official, participant, or spectator at a match,..., the original jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter shall vest immediately in the State Association or Organization Member through which the accused game official is registered.

(C) Any allegation of misconduct... by a game official..., or of unethical conduct, misuse or abuse of authority..., shall be made in writing to the State Referee Administrator or to the State Association(s) or Organization Member....

Now, you may say nothing will happen, well this past week we received such a report. The referee was immediately suspended until the hearing, at which time the penalty will be determined; the referee will have the right to an appeal. This is the exact same procedure for Abuse of a Referee.

SOLUTION:
  • Please do not complain, dissent, threaten referees before, during or after a game, especially youth refs.
  • If the referee is accused of Misconduct, report it.
  • If you are unhappy with performance of the referee, inform your coach, manager, or DOC. The DOC has the option of contacting the Referee Assignor or the State Referee Committee.
depends on what he said to his daughter, sorry but there needs to be more context. Maybe he did report him as well?

If he made a lewd comment, cussed at his daughter etc., no I do not find him disgraceful.
 
Watch this and you will have a better understanding how new referees are trained in other states
 
Watch this and you will have a better understanding how new referees are trained in other states
If that parent behaved that way over a bad call, then that’s just dumb. But the way that father was acting looked like it was in response to something said inappropriately to his daughter. If that’s the case, then no I don’t blame him. And that kid shouldn’t be a ref and has nothing to do with the little amount of training that was given.

Just not enough context for me
 
Back
Top