LOL, AZ should have 2 GOP Senators and a GOP governor but they don't due to the extreme candidates put up via the GOP primary process.
That's exactly right but hey... who pays attention to gas prices anymore? Gavinor Newscum just does whatever the fuck he wants to us with the privilege taxes of being a Californian. Doesn't phase him at all. He just paid more than half a million more than asking price for his humble abode.
robbreport.com
Same way they want ICE unmasked so our sworn officers can be attacked in their private lives. Same way they want conservative judges to be exposed by going out of their way to publish their home addresses.
Wrong again loser. What does WHAT feed ots mind? My gosh, these "we" people are nuts. The "we" cartel group stole the elections in AZ, trust me. Look at Katie. The military allowed the "we" group to steal. Buckle up folks
These "we" people are not to be trusted
Whataboutism again?
Price of doing business. You need to get yourself into a higher tax bracket.
"I can't stand" is a very strong use of words. I can't stand bandits, cheaters, killers, liars and scum bags WHO lied to my pals about the jabs. My gosh, 98% in socal took the first does. The mouses went first. I said, "fuck no, I will not wear a mask or take any jabs. My reward for saying no is losing everything O worked hard for. The cheaters and liars made more money for themselves. Good luck watty with your health and I mean that 100%. Men with cardiac arrest is through the roof. Kids getting cancer and heard defects is insane!!
This is the "we" group mindset. Cheat, lie and steal from others to get yourself into a higher slave bracket
The problem we have in AZ is the fact that people leave CA because of the policies that make the state increasingly unaffordable...and then turn around and vote for the same type of candidates that made them leave CA in the first place.
Hardly, meet Biggs & Gosar.
Cartel cheated
Lmao, you clearly don't know what whataboutism is. Both parties have extremists, so examples from both isn't whataboutism, its supporting a statement.
Cuomo may also run as an independent. General voter base is quite different. Primaries bring out the more adamant voters. Adam’s? Cuomo? Shows where we are at.Lmao, you clearly don't know what whataboutism is. Both parties have extremists, so examples from both isn't whataboutism, its supporting a statement.
Mamdani should be a shoo-in now for mayor, and its doubtful he'll get to do half of what he says, not least as its not affordable. One Dem in one city, even the biggest in the nation, doesn't define the country. New York is hardly a reflection of likely voters across the nation, and so, a trend does not make. BTW, both the NY Times and the NY Post said not to vote for him, and those papers don't agree on day and night.
As for the embrace of Democrats, he didn't get to 50%, although he will once the transfer voting takes place. That means more Dems voted against him than for him as their #1 candidate. I wouldn't call that being "embraced by Democrats", based on any rational reading of the results. Turnout was at ... 10%.
While he would be expected to win the election, there's no guarantee of that, and his policies are going to be scrutinized and costed to the yazoo ... Adams running as an independent will also mess up the race.
Your original response was the very definition of whataboutism. I said Mamdani and you said, whatabout Karri Lake and other AZ Repubs, instead of addressing anything about Mamdani in your original response. This response is 100% mental gymnastics.Lmao, you clearly don't know what whataboutism is. Both parties have extremists, so examples from both isn't whataboutism, its supporting a statement.
Mamdani should be a shoo-in now for mayor, and its doubtful he'll get to do half of what he says, not least as its not affordable. One Dem in one city, even the biggest in the nation, doesn't define the country. New York is hardly a reflection of likely voters across the nation, and so, a trend does not make. BTW, both the NY Times and the NY Post said not to vote for him, and those papers don't agree on day and night.
As for the embrace of Democrats, he didn't get to 50%, although he will once the transfer voting takes place. That means more Dems voted against him than for him as their #1 candidate. I wouldn't call that being "embraced by Democrats", based on any rational reading of the results. Turnout was at ... 10%.
While he would be expected to win the election, there's no guarantee of that, and his policies are going to be scrutinized and costed to the yazoo ... Adams running as an independent will also mess up the race.
