Chula Vista seems on the ascendancy as a result of the fall of nomadsAnecdotally, I had heard the Nomads simply began forfeiting numerous MLSN games at various age levels early in the year. The league apparently sent an email to the players parent's advising of the removal from the league. In all honesty, it could be good in the long-run as it gives them the opportunity to rebuild in SoCal League or another lower level letter league if they can gain access. Right around this time is when Sporting San Diego got MLSN II in no small part from their MLS pro veteran I am sure. If they do well I would not be surprised if they get promoted to full MLSN status. No idea what happened to Chula Vista
I tend to agree, SoCal seems to be a place for youngers before the ABC leagues really kick into gear. I thought E64 was going away as well but haven't seen any confirmation of that.
I also agree MLSN II initially seems to simply be a rebranding of EA teams, EA is a rebranding of the EA2 teams and EA2 is a rebranding of Flight 1/2 teams. It does allow for more shuffling of players within the club to various levels based on ability (if the players/parents agree to the switch). I am also seeing multiple EA teams bio-banding players for the 25/26 season which is interesting.
How it will work for the non mlsn mls2 teams depends really on how many players the bigger clubs drop from mlsn either permanently or for play time. Some of them are carrying very bloated rosters. The issue is reserve and futures players seem reluctant to play down for fear of being permanently sent there. But it doesn’t really work to interlock unless mlsn and mlsn ii share practice at the same branch: otherwise the mls ii players are just getting benched by strangers coming down or you force players to attend double practices.