The back & forth with Slob came out of a comment I made in reply to him (
comment) where I also said that if B deserves to be prosecuted, then I'm fine with that. I'm consistent on that. The FBI investigated C and said there wasn't enough evidence to prosecute, which is odd to me still, but I don't have any access to how the FBI got to that determination. B's docs are relatively new (discovery that is), so I'm not sure how that will play out.
They are all different though, so each should be looked at distinctly IMV, hence my comment to Slob, i.e. if your only "defense" of a nefarious action is whatabout something or someone else that's similar but not the same, then its no "defense" at all.
Agree on the weaponization et al, that's a dark path for any country to decide to go down.