Ok, here is the methodology used by Mark at the Soccer Rankings app for his analysis of the comparison between each league. I just needed to read a bit lower on his FB post and I would have seen it! Like I said before, partisans of one league or another can question the methodology, but Mark is the only one doing this in a scientific way for the time being, so I think this has to be the starting point for any discussion. Looking at one tourney, or one age group, or cherry-picking examples can get you any result you want to find, so take all those posts with a grain of salt. Here is what Mark did, per his FB post:Link to described bracket
Yes, that particular tournament seems to show what you're suggesting, but not sure that is in conflict with any other belief of rankings/strength, right? SC Del Sol are 42nd in the country, with a 47.85. The 2008 team they lost to is the #4 best team in the country, #1 in state. The Eagles 07 show #43 nationally, with a 47.84, so the likelihood is it would be a close game, but Eagles ended up taking it. Slammers are #23 in the country (48.41), and would be expected to end up on top. As far as I can tell, the top-rated AZ GA team (SC Del Sol) would be expected to show mid-pack or slightly lower in SC ECNL; that's the prediction, and that was borne out in the showcase.
The comparing league to league metrics are a challenge - not because the math is impossible, but you need to define what would be a proper comparison. Comparing best teams vs best teams? Average strength of all teams vs average strength of teams? Average strength if you drop the outliers on the top and the bottom? Comparing a specific team vs. another specific team doesn't leave nearly as much wiggle room to define terms. The footnote in one of the images earlier in the thread says it all, in that the best teams from "lower" brackets can sometimes compete well into the higher brackets. In addition, some of the lowest teams in the highest brackets, might fall towards the bottom of the table even if they were placed into a lower bracket.
I appreciate Mark posting up those league comparison numbers, but I would be curious if he could share just a little of the metrics he used. The FAQ in SR goes into pretty deep detail about the formulas used for Club Rating, etc; so he is generally comfortable in sharing his thinking on these.
"
We are regularly asked "Which is the best league?" USA Sport Statistics analyzed the Soccer Rankings database to find the answer. We calculated the rating of the average team in each league for each age group and gender. We looked at the 2006 - 2010 age groups and found the rankings were the same. We also calculated the difference between the average team in each league and the average team in the best league. For example, the average boys MLS Next team would beat the average boys Elite 64 team by about 2.3 goals.
Our takeaway is that there is a lot of overlap in quality between MLS Next and ECNL National boys. However, Elite 64, EA and ECNL Regional boys are quite similar and a lot weaker. For girls, ECNL National is by far the strongest competition.
Download the app by visiting https://usasportstatistics.net or find the Soccer Rankings app on Google Play and Apple."
He's really good about replying to emails and tweaking things based on user comments, so download his app - pay for the pro version - and then dig further by asking him questions if you really want to get to the bottom of the question: "which league is best?"