Victim? The only thing that lie cost you was a chance to buy up the PPE our doctors needed.
And then Trump shared about therapeutics and was hammered for telling everyone to inject bleach and horse poop in their arms. No one lies like this unless their being blackmailed or their in on the heist or just cold blooded killers.
No, they lied so you and your Bots here would preach lies to get people to inject poison in their immune system and their kids immune system. It's called fraud and people are dying and those who lied will pay the ultimate price.
I know what your about and it's not good dad. Seriously, you make feel sick to my stomach lair!!!
They lied about effectiveness...they've lied about studies, they've lied about many things to do with your public health. There are plenty of smart and had working scientist at the CDC. Unfortunately those in power have become lazy and political. Public health emergencies are hard enough, they are even harder when you lose credibility. have you checked out paxlovid lately? nothing lazy about it right? follow the $$$ , usually leads you to lazy crats getting rich.
And that my friend is why you are an authoritarian if not an outright totalitarian. The damage from the lie isn’t the chance to buy ppe. The damage is the destruction of trust it does to the system plus it debases the liar and demeans the recipient. What’s worse is humans being humans is it enables the elites who are in on the lie to cheat and the expense of everyone else (why we have things like insider trading laws). No lies…no public trust problem. It’s easy man…the noble lie should NEVER be part of public policy.
It's called fraud. When you do fraud, you pay the ultimate price. Dad is a liar at best right now. I swear 100% every single person on here is being watched with what they say, teach and preach. Dad, Espola, Husker and EOTL Bot will have to give an answer to those lies.
rumble.com
Kids and vaccines? What about it?
No it’s ridiculous. Near zero chance of death and very very small risk of hospitalization from Covid in that population. New efficacy numbers that indicate a with omicron it’s about 20-30% efficacy and falls with time to zero. Close quarters with prolonged periods of exposure which means even if vaccines reduce transmission it’s still going to rip through the population. Almost everyone of them has been exposed naturally at this point. And a heightened risk of myocarditis in males of that age group. While it may have arguably made sense when they thought the vaccine was sterlizing, once it mutated it made zero sense because this age group is going to 100% get it anyways.
The institution needs to decide on some policy, or lack of policy. One possible policy is the one you suggest. Calmly explain that covid spreads well in dorms, but that the institution is not taking precautions because it probably won’t send you to the hospital.
Here’s why institutionally we tend to rush to the worst case scenario: because if they adopt my policy and some immunocompromised kid with aids winds up in the hospital, the consultant is going to get blamed. What’s worse is the risk managers for the underwriters, prior to issuing their Covid rider, probably required the university to hire said consultant. So the university can’t go against the consultants recommends without losing their rider. And the consultant can’t just say well here are the pros and cons because the underwriter will only insure if there’s a consultant approved plan in place. And there is no upside for the consultant in throwing it down the middle of the plate: if they get it wrong not only might they be professionally liable but they’ll also torch their reputation while being overly cautious costs them nothing. You see this phenomena all the time in outside law forms being asked to give opinion letters to companies as well. The only thing that’s going to shift this is the first big myocarditis lawsuit with a big damage award (the McDonald’s coffee cup case of vaccines) because in most jurisdictions the shield applies to manufacturers and governments, not private employers and institutions that issue mandates (I may be wrong but I think California and Massachusetts extended the shield to education institutions).
It’s known as legally liable or legal liability. Look it up.
My buddy has a kid playing on the East Coast. Had the flu and took the "test" and it came back positive. This sweet, young 18 year old dd got booted out of her dorm room on campus and bused to a hotel for a week, alone! Insane!
In other words, the consultant is forced to actually pay attention to the immunocompromised kid with aids and the seemingly healthy kid with an undiagnosed heart condition.
Ha I knew you’d miss the point. The consultant has to make a risk assessment but there is no upside to the consultant actually making a proper risk assessment…the incentives are always to take the most cautious instead of the most realistic approach…from the upteen different options all of which account for the entire pool of people. From someone who doesn’t let their kid head a ball, probably never let them eat cookie dough, and likely eats his meat well done, of course you like that. The rest of us don’t live life that way. I’m frankly surprised you do travel soccer at all…the risks of injury are astonished high (the girls are virtually guaranteed one before they finish) not to mention the car ride.
Think about it. Why would the government extend the protection to itself and pharma?
Except the “vaccine” doesn’t prevent transmission, so there is that.
