Vaccine

Only regime approved protest are allowed folks

any other threaten “democracy”

when you “threaten democracy”, any action is warranted

the ones who scream the loudest about “saving democracy” have also been the quickest to invoke emergency powers the last 2 years
 
espola said:
Where does she say "stop protesting the government"?
Click to expand...
Its funny how her saying, if your bank account is frozen because you are doing illegal shit, then stop doing the illegal shit and we can work on unfreezing the bank account - turns into ".. if they stop protesting the government."

Invoking the Emergency Act (passed in 1988) under which the Public Order Emergency (expires after 30 days or can be called sooner) is a reach to me, and I would have thought there are enough laws on the books to deal with it, but I'm not Canadian, so wouldn't know. Apparently 66% of Canadians support (or supported) its use though, with 70%+ in a few regions. It was also passed in Parliament (required).

If someone really wants to get upset about a (Western) government looking to restrict citizen protests, then they should just go check out what the (Conservative) UK government is looking to pass.
 
Grace T. said:
Errr...because it's liberty, which sometimes conflicts with the collective good.

The problem with the collective good is that without liberty, it degenerates into tyranny, regardless of the form of government, whether monarch, aristocracy or monarchy, because someone must make the decision, and those people could very well be flawed.
Click to expand...
The problem is that every group in power believes that they are immune to all the ills of every previous group in power.
 
kickingandscreaming said:
The problem is that every group in power believes that they are immune to all the ills of every previous group in power.
Click to expand...
And the stupid thing is the great masses generally believe them time and time again when they promised to protect us from the terrorist bombs, or bring about the workers paradise, or stop the seas from rising, or make America great again, or end covid, or safety and security for all to thunderous applause.
 
@dad4 this is another reason for so much skepticism…it doesn’t sound odd to you that they are withholding information because “it’s not ready for prime time”… what? If that is for real, not good

www.dailymail.co.uk

CDC refusing to publish data on booster effectiveness for those 18-49

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was accused on Monday of withholding vital swathes of its data on COVID-19. The CDC said it was to prevent misinterpretation.
www.dailymail.co.uk
 
soccersc said:
@dad4 this is another reason for so much skepticism…it doesn’t sound odd to you that they are withholding information because “it’s not ready for prime time”… what? If that is for real, not good

www.dailymail.co.uk

CDC refusing to publish data on booster effectiveness for those 18-49

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was accused on Monday of withholding vital swathes of its data on COVID-19. The CDC said it was to prevent misinterpretation.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...
Given what I see here, it is reasonable to assume that people will misinterpret the data.

For example, younger people are less vaccinated. Younger people are also less likely to need dental work. If you put your mind to it, you can twist those two facts to show that the vaccine causes tooth decay.

If that sounds silly, look back to the argument on UK data for ”deaths from all causes”. A bunch of people here made exactly that argument, except replace “tooth decay” with “death”.

So, yeah. I think misinterpretation is kind of a given at this point.
 
dad4 said:
Given what I see here, it is reasonable to assume that people will misinterpret the data.

For example, younger people are less vaccinated. Younger people are also less likely to need dental work. If you put your mind to it, you can twist those two facts to show that the vaccine causes tooth decay.

If that sounds silly, look back to the argument on UK data for ”deaths from all causes”. A bunch of people here made exactly that argument, except replace “tooth decay” with “death”.

So, yeah. I think misinterpretation is kind of a given at this point.
Click to expand...
Like when we didn’t need masks?

Guess we should have expected that you of all people would be in favor of limited data in order to manipulate the results to fit your narrative.

Numbers don’t lie, only people do….
 
Kicker 2.0 said:
Like when we didn’t need masks?

Guess we should have expected that you of all people would be in favor of limited data in order to manipulate the results to fit your narrative.

Numbers don’t lie, only people do….
Click to expand...
Do females have to take the jab to play in college?
 
From Catturd:
For the past year - the Biden regime has called me a racist, Nazi, and a murderer for being unvaccinated.

Why would I give a damn what they say about me for not supporting WWIII with Russia just to protect Hunter's million dollar no-show job employer.
 
dad4 said:
Given what I see here, it is reasonable to assume that people will misinterpret the data.

For example, younger people are less vaccinated. Younger people are also less likely to need dental work. If you put your mind to it, you can twist those two facts to show that the vaccine causes tooth decay.

If that sounds silly, look back to the argument on UK data for ”deaths from all causes”. A bunch of people here made exactly that argument, except replace “tooth decay” with “death”.

So, yeah. I think misinterpretation is kind of a given at this point.
Click to expand...
You and the CDC/FDA have something in common - lack of credibility. Or maybe you've been overly influenced by neat and tidy data presented by pharma.

At least we agree that covid vaccines shoulnd't be administered to healthy young children. And that masking is theatre, school masking does very little, and that little o has rendered mandates scientfically obsolete.
 
GoldenGate said:
This is a perfect example of the typical right wing nutter. Spewing anti-vax/mask bs at a kiddie soccer website isn't working to your satisfaction, so dog whistle some transphobia instead. Classic. Well, you and your fellow racist/xenophobic/homophobic/transphobic buddies already have other threads for those topics at this kiddie soccer website, so please be respectful and put your bigotry in the right place, ok?

Let's get this back to soccer-related vaccine posts. Is your kid going to inject the bat poison, or did you just steer her away from going to college so she could fly to Spain and then right back when she is denied entry?
Click to expand...
Why do you assume she/her bigot? Your moronic rules, not mine.
 
Bubba said:
Depends on School , if not vaccinated you needed weekly test at my players school
Click to expand...
What about incoming 2022s and P5s? If your already there, you can skirt around it. I was on all the calls Bubba and the Jab was an issue. I get coaches don;t want to deal with another political hot topic but man, this is about the health of a 17 year old and whether she should inject a bio weapon in order to get a full ride. It's no brainer for my kid but I know other kids who took the jab because they have been working for over 12 years to get a full ride. Another friend of mine took the jab to keep his job and now he has blood clots. I said no jab and it's been rough financially, I won;t lie. I know another kid that went to Texas at a small Christian College and no jab there but they dont play quality games and besides, my kid is not into all that force religion stuff.
 
Kicker 2.0 said:
Like when we didn’t need masks?

Guess we should have expected that you of all people would be in favor of limited data in order to manipulate the results to fit your narrative.

Numbers don’t lie, only people do….
Click to expand...
More elitist BS from @dad4. It's a reminder of how someone can be so intelligent in one area such as mathematics and so clueless in understanding people, their motivations, and the consequence of actions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top