"No, it's not" refers to the claim that it's a yes or no question.
Given the context of that exchange, the “No, it’s not” comment was about as intentionally misleading as @crush (rip) ‘s “I got my ‘V’s’” statement.
"No, it's not" refers to the claim that it's a yes or no question.
Given the context of that exchange, the “No, it’s not” comment was about as intentionally misleading as @crush (rip) ‘s “I got my ‘V’s’” statement.
Hey now. I got all my "V's" is the truth. I got "IT" two years ago. How is that misleading? I have been honest, open and transparent more then anyone here. What's your name? My name is Bill. Come on man!! Oh please. I'm an open book and you should know that by now. I was called a hypocrite too which is the complete opposite of me. Thanks for putting "crush" down. He did his part and I'm super proud of him. Perfect? No. Liar? No! Shrewd? Yes! I have not got any of these shots or boosters, never will. Call them what you want NOOB, but Vax is not the right word. I think we can all agree this is not what you wanted injected into your veins. Oh no, these last two years is much deeper. This is not a Vaccine. Even the dude who invited his jab says so.Given the context of that exchange, the “No, it’s not” comment was about as intentionally misleading as @crush (rip) ‘s “I got my ‘V’s’” statement.
I wish we could pull a Reagan Air Traffic Controllers move on these and the Chicago teachers.San Francisco teachers are staging a sick out tomorrow to protest a lack of covid testing.
“We”? Interesting, all your wishes come true in one move! Plus the juxtaposition of a Reagan act coming back into a situation partially fostered by a Republican (in name only) president.I wish we could pull a Reagan Air Traffic Controllers move on these and the Chicago teachers.
I disagree there’s any quarterbacking going on by either side here. Some of us knew what was happening as early as April 2020. By summer of 2020 the aged stratification of risk was very very clear to anyone willing to look at the data instead of the hysterics of what if. One side was very clearly wrong here. One side was very clearly right and knew it early on.layered and complex, as most things are when dealing with children. It's very easy to sit back in your rocking chair and monday morning quarterback things.
So how would you have done things, from day one?I disagree there’s any quarterbacking going on by either side here. Some of us knew what was happening as early as April 2020. By summer of 2020 the aged stratification of risk was very very clear to anyone willing to look at the data instead of the hysterics of what if. One side was very clearly wrong here. One side was very clearly right and knew it early on.
Please don't disturb my fantasy.“We”? Interesting, all your wishes come true in one move! Plus the juxtaposition of a Reagan act coming back into a situation partially fostered by a Republican (in name only) president.
So how would you have done things, from day one?
I believe in individual rights and collective bargaining.Please don't disturb my fantasy.
Do you support Chicago and SF teachers not going to work?
So yes, although those two things are contradictory?I believe in individual rights and collective bargaining.
We need to go back to 1963So how would you have done things, from day one?
The individual has the right to make their own decisions, including joining forces to represent their best interests.So yes, although those two things are contradictory?
The Forces of Evil have been one tough foe for all of us on the side of the truth and light. Soon and very soon, the forces of darkness that you belong to will be overThe individual has the right to make their own decisions, including joining forces to represent their best interests.
A better and more accurate headline would be....."Despite us and everyone screaming that one must wear a mask, 2 + years into it we really don't have any evidence to show they work."In the end this is the story of masks: it comes down to making people "feel safer".
![]()
Covid: Evidence on face masks in schools 'inconclusive'
Government admits uncertainty over whether face coverings will truly cut Covid spread.www.bbc.com