What did I get wrong?
Vaccine
- Thread starter Multi Sport
- Start date
What did I get wrong?
We're back to the Magoo Two Step. "What did I get wrong?" is one of my favorite parts. It's a catchy part of the song, the moves are challenging without being overtly confusing, and it isn't too ostentatious in its presentation.
Next you'll be telling me properly describing dad 4 as an authoritarian is an ad hominem but implying I "get it wrong" repeatedly isn't. The gaslighting from you 3 is really incredible, particularly when it comes to ads.
You know perfectly well. I'm not going to draw you a diagram.
You do get it wrong repeatedly, and I show your error every time I find one. That's addressing your content, not your character.
Same with authoritarianism. His content is repeatedly authoritarian...and your content repeatedly loses the thread and you repeatedly do this little nonsensical dance with many have now called you on.
No, I don't. Pursuing facts is not a "nonsensical dance".
Hahahahahahaha! That's even funnier than the last one.
BTW, I think it's just so darn funny that I've actually gotten a troll into a loop to try and defend and justify his own behavior. This is totally epic dude.
It looks like you have lost the thread. What is wrong with pursuing facts? What is wrong with asking people to clarify their comments? What is wrong with expecting posters to provide the source of their otherwise unsupported conclusions?
A challenge for you -- how many posts can you go without backing into a Magoo ad hominem?
Because that's not what you do. If you were really going to do that, you would ask an intelligent question or make an intelligent comment. But what we get from you is the "coocoo" or "nonsense" or the partisan rhetoric or the laziness or just the general getting lost. You are more interested in trolling than getting to any sort of truth.
That's totally false ad hominems, as expected.
Hahahahahahahah! That's the best one yet! I'm describing what you do! It's seriously the distinction you drew! OMG I'm laughing in tears here.
EvilGoalie 21
GOLD
Actually, if you could link this I'd be interested. Maybe you already did, but, you know, there's lots of stuff and I skim most of it quickly. With the new kid on the block we are already seeing people who should know better confusing infectivity with virulence in terms of evolutionary arguments about where Cov-2 is going. Don't know if that is what this is but would like to check it out.
Hüsker Dü
DA
You are responding to an ego not a real person.
A few caveats. The first is Prof. Inoue of the Japanese National Institute of Genetics is the source. The original paper is in Japanese. I don't have the time to give it the half hour - hour it takes to find the summaries (some of them are bad, some of them particularly in the scie journals) are better, but I am very busy which is partially the reason I don't just post it (as I've written before this takes up maybe 10% of my attention while I'm multitasking). I don't book mark things (posting stuff here is I'm kind of like a little kid collecting interesting colored stones in a basket). But I'll send you the video previously posted by PM (don't want to brook espola's laziness and the summary is around minute 10.....Campbell is discussing a bunch of theories for why Japan is acting the way it does and starts with Ivermectin and goes into the defense enzyme which the Japanese may have a higher proportion of....you can do research from there). Again, don't know if it's true or not. Don't really care. I just found it an interesting colored stone.
This is actually a fair criticism.
Another pretty stone. Comparing reinfection rates on the vaxxed, recovered, vaxxed+recovered, recovered+vaxx. Recovered provides longer lasting and more robust protection than just vaxxed. All 4 fade with time.
Your suggestion was that I don't ask intelligent questions. When I do, you run away with "reading comprehension" and "Magoo" and the like. For example, I attempted to have a meaningful discussion on the "run out of mutations" point", even to the extent of reviewing the thread where you claimed the original discussion was. I didn't find it. When I asked for support from you, you called me lazy, despite the fact that I was doing all the heavy lifting in that discussion.
Anybody can read the thread and see your evasions and ad hominems for themselves. You don't have a lot to be proud of there. And now you are cackling as if you scored some point, instead of just running away. There is a social/psychological term for that behavior, but the name of the term escapes me. It's on the line of "false bravado", but that's not exactly the term I'm thinking of.
I think her ego is overruling her common sense.
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
and hilarious given it comes from a multi-aliased troll
Speaking of criticism of how the media handled COVID....
No you didn't. For an example of meaningful discussion, see what evil goalie did. What you did was not that.
Again, I can't help it if you lose the threads or can't fully follow them. What you did is the Magoo Two Step, which is your MO, and I'm not even the one that first called you out with it (kuddos to him....it's very clever).
And there's an easy name which doesn't escape anyone for what you do....we've all seen it...I'm one of a dozen that have called you out on it: troll.
Here's the difference between you and I:
-I readily concede my ego is a valid criticism. However, I have something to back it up (several things actually but I'll just, in an attempt to keep my ego in check name one): that I've been more right than the gruesome troll trio + dad 4 throughout this entire thing.
-You have an amazing ego as well (ever notice that you are your own favorite subject?). However, to date, I've seen very little to back it up....instead what we get is reading comprehension issues, short pithy sayings you think are clever or show your debating prowess, the Two Step, general trollish behavior, getting lost and crashing, picking up on weird little threads that lose the main point of the argument, and a general crankiness.