President Joe Biden

[Grace T.]

When the riot started? How many people were dead by then?

After the big lie, the little lies come easily.

Same standard for the ds. Then sanders Harris and waters all have blood on their hands and should be removed

he didn’t tell them to seize the capitol or riot Prior to that. He even said it should be peaceful and patriotic. You can’t hold him legally responsible. The test for incitement is very strict and far exceeds spreading lies or working people emotionally up.

you just see lies because you are in your magoo fog and don’t know which way is up and down. Poor magoo.

 

[espola]

Same standard for the ds. Then sanders Harris and waters all have blood on their hands and should be removed

he didn’t tell them to seize the capitol or riot Prior to that. He even said it should be peaceful and patriotic. You can’t hold him legally responsible. The test for incitement is very strict and far exceeds spreading lies or working people emotionally up.

you just see lies because you are in your magoo fog and don’t know which way is up and down. Poor magoo.

I laugh every time I see you use the word "legal".

 

[Scott m Shurson]

"his speech called for peaceful protest and he told them to go home"

That's either ignorant or a lie. Pick one.

Do you not own a television? Does CNN show you ALL the news or not?

 

[Scott m Shurson]

I laugh every time I see you use the word "legal".

We laugh every time you use “coocoo” because you’re schooled by someone.

 

[Grace T.]

I laugh every time I see you use the word "legal".

poor old Magoo. We love you anyways <pats you on the head and sighs>

 

[espola]

poor old Magoo. We love you anyways <pats you on the head and sighs>

Condescension is your best argument?

Please continue.

 

[Grace T.]

Condescension is your best argument?

Please continue.

I choose to believe you are poor confused Magoo, instead of a partisan hack that willfully confuses things and distorts the truth. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, and recognizing your occasional flash of lucidness. <Hug and another head pat>.

 

[espola]

I choose to believe you are poor confused Magoo, instead of a partisan hack that willfully confuses things and distorts the truth. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, and recognizing your occasional flash of lucidness. <Hug and another head pat>.

Partisan? What party?

 

[Grace T.]

Partisan? What party?

Hah, that's funny. Shall we put up a survey? Folks?

 

[espola]

Hah, that's funny. Shall we put up a survey? Folks?

You didn't answer the question.

 

[Grace T.]

You didn't answer the question.

Because the question itself is stupid. If you aren't a confused Magoo, you are a partisan left wing troll, your protestations of being a "c" conservative notwithstanding. But as I said, I choose to give you the benefit of the doubt and believe you are just a confused curmudgeon, and that you aren't a partisan left wing troll.

<another head pat>

 

[espola]

Because the question itself is stupid. If you aren't a confused Magoo, you are a partisan left wing troll, your protestations of being a "c" conservative notwithstanding. But as I said, I choose to give you the benefit of the doubt and believe you are just a confused curmudgeon, and that you aren't a partisan left wing troll.

<another head pat>

What positions have I taken that are not classically conservative?

 

[Grace T.]

What positions have I taken that are not classically conservative?

As we've discussed in the past, it's all in the definitions. You'd have to say what you mean by "classically conservative". IIRC you were also very supportive of the April-August protests so am very curious as to how you reconcile that with classically conservative.

If you want to consider yourself "classically conservative" that's your right, whatever that means. You can be an astronaut, a spy or Emperor of North America for all I care <another head pat and a sigh>

 

[espola]

As we've discussed in the past, it's all in the definitions. You'd have to say what you mean by "classically conservative". IIRC you were also very supportive of the April-August protests so am very curious as to how you reconcile that with classically conservative.

If you want to consider yourself "classically conservative" that's your right, whatever that means. You can be an astronaut, a spy or Emperor of North America for all I care <another head pat and a sigh>

Very supportive of what? Show me what led you to that conclusion.

My best attribute is that I have never claimed to be a lawyer.

 

[Grace T.]

Very supportive of what? Show me what led you to that conclusion.

My best attribute is that I have never claimed to be a lawyer.

That's why I said "IIRC". If you are saying now you don't support the April-August protests, hey I believe you. I'm not going to take the time to pull all your posts that might still be up from that time period.

As to your second sentence, we agree on something!

 

[espola]

Here is a classical-conservative thought from Jim Wright's FB page, in response to neo-conservative Senator Ron Johnson --

If, as a senator, you're afraid to convict Trump of violent insurrection because his insane and violent followers have threatened to rise up in violent insurrection and murder you and then burn down the country, well, you know, THAT seems like it might be the exact reason Trump should be convicted.
And if, as a Senator, you openly admit that you KNOW what you did wrong, unpatriotic, undemocratic, racist, seditionist, and complete and criminal repudiation of the oath you swore, BUT, you also openly admit that you just don't care -- well, THAT likewise seems like a pretty goddamn good reason to throw your treasonist ass out of congress and right into a prison cell.

 

[espola]

That's why I said "IIRC". If you are saying now you don't support the April-August protests, hey I believe you. I'm not going to take the time to pull all your posts that might still be up from that time period.

As to your second sentence, we agree on something!

I couldn't disagree with some of the sentiments expressed by the protestors after watching a video of a man being tortured and murdered by multiple police officers. I did not support the violence that accompanied some of the protests.

IIRC.

 

[Grace T.]

I couldn't disagree with some of the sentiments expressed by the protestors after watching a video of a man being tortured and murdered by multiple police officers. I did not support the violence that accompanied some of the protests.

IIRC.

Do you support "defund the police"?

 

[espola]

Do you support "defund the police"?

That depends on the definition.

 

[Grace T.]

Here is a classical-conservative thought from Jim Wright's FB page, in response to neo-conservative Senator Ron Johnson --

If, as a senator, you're afraid to convict Trump of violent insurrection because his insane and violent followers have threatened to rise up in violent insurrection and murder you and then burn down the country, well, you know, THAT seems like it might be the exact reason Trump should be convicted.
And if, as a Senator, you openly admit that you KNOW what you did wrong, unpatriotic, undemocratic, racist, seditionist, and complete and criminal repudiation of the oath you swore, BUT, you also openly admit that you just don't care -- well, THAT likewise seems like a pretty goddamn good reason to throw your treasonist ass out of congress and right into a prison cell.

Jim Wright the speaker of the house that died in 2015?

 

[Grace T.]

That depends on the definition.

Well, you tell me. What do you support and don't. I'm not the one trying to prove he's a "classical conservative". I've already told you I don't believe you are just a lefty liberal troll, but rather a confused curmudgeon. You seem to be going out of your way to prove my point.