President Joe Biden

Why is your impetus always to censor? You really have a tyrannical streak in you.

I'm not calling anybody to arms. I'm warning about a very dangerous situation (the same way I did before the Capitol and COVID BTW).

Why is it you always have a tendency to get nasty whenever you hear something you really don't like? Most of the time you are really mellow, cool and I love your opinions, but then you get in this mode and it's bad dad again. "LALALALA....I don't want to hear it......LALALALA.....don't say it."

Adults, BTW, don't tell other adults how to say things because they think they know better.

Suggesting you act like an adult is censoring?

The real weakness in your juvenile outburst is that everyone can read the Bill on their own and don't have to depend on what someone told them how Tucker is shading it.
 
That evasive habit of yours always makes your arguments look weak.

Why do I care? This isn't a contest. It's not even an argument, but a prediction. Believe my warning, or not (same as COVID.....wasn't you but someone told me "naw, they'll never cancel MIC...too much money at stake").

I only know I can never beat in you in a cuteness contest. Your little yellow car and that chicken on your head are just too priceless.
 
Suggesting you act like an adult is censoring?

The real weakness in your juvenile outburst is that everyone can read the Bill on their own and don't have to depend on what someone told them how Tucker is shading it.

Naw, it's the don't say it please which is dad's tendency to censor. Same way he didn't think negative mask discussion was useful.

Hey people should read the bill....on that we agree.....the more people that read it the better. I'd urge them to read it.
 
Why is your impetus always to censor? You really have a tyrannical streak in you.

I'm not calling anybody to arms. I'm warning about a very dangerous situation (the same way I did before the Capitol and COVID BTW).

Why is it you always have a tendency to get nasty whenever you hear something you really don't like? Most of the time you are really mellow, cool and I love your opinions, but then you get in this mode and it's bad dad again. "LALALALA....I don't want to hear it......LALALALA.....don't say it."

Adults, BTW, don't tell other adults how to say things because they think they know better.
It is a wink and a nod exhortation, and a very old trick.

Don't encourage violence. Just say that things are bad and violence is coming. Use words like "people will be very angry. They'll fight.". Normalize violence without ever quite endorsing it. That way, when violence comes, you can pretend you never encouraged it.

But I like my non violent world. Therefore, when you or EOTL use this tactic, I am going to call each of you on your respective bullshit.

Peace.
 
Naw, it's the don't say it please which is dad's tendency to censor. Same way he didn't think negative mask discussion was useful.

Hey people should read the bill....on that we agree.....the more people that read it the better. I'd urge them to read it.

I will assume you have read the bill, then. Where is the part about "No signatures for absentee ballot"?
 
It is a wink and a nod exhortation, and a very old trick.

Don't encourage violence. Just say that things are bad and violence is coming. Use words like "people will be very angry. They'll fight.". Normalize violence without ever quite endorsing it. That way, when violence comes, you can pretend you never encouraged it.

But I like my non violent world. Therefore, when you or EOTL use this tactic, I am going to call each of you on your respective bullshit.

Peace.

You're implying bad faith implications on something which I'm raising a concern about. Your BS tactic is the same thing the appeasers did before WWII and later they had blood on their hands because they weren't ready. I'm calling you out now on your tyrannical tendencies to censor and bad faith interpretations of my motives, not to mention your arrogant condescending attitude that isn't "adult" at all, but rather a teacher who thinks he's lecturing students. Compare our two track records....everyone knows you've been wrong about everything having to do with COVID.
 
You're implying bad faith implications on something which I'm raising a concern about. Your BS tactic is the same thing the appeasers did before WWII and later they had blood on their hands because they weren't ready. I'm calling you out now on your tyrannical tendencies to censor and bad faith interpretations of my motives, not to mention your arrogant condescending attitude that isn't "adult" at all, but rather a teacher who thinks he's lecturing students. Compare our two track records....everyone knows you've been wrong about everything having to do with COVID.

Nonsense.
 
I will assume you have read the bill, then. Where is the part about "No signatures for absentee ballot"?
It's in 1621. Signatures are permitted but only on certain due process conditions. The conditions are so severe however, and the lawsuits it opens up for discounted ballots and challenging state procedures, that the end result will be no signature verification for absentee ballots
 
You're implying bad faith implications on something which I'm raising a concern about. Your BS tactic is the same thing the appeasers did before WWII and later they had blood on their hands because they weren't ready. I'm calling you out now on your tyrannical tendencies to censor and bad faith interpretations of my motives, not to mention your arrogant condescending attitude that isn't "adult" at all, but rather a teacher who thinks he's lecturing students. Compare our two track records....everyone knows you've been wrong about everything having to do with COVID.
And there is the second Hitler reference.

As always, a Hitler reference is a sign that the rest of the argument is not worth listening to.
 
It's in 1621. Signatures are permitted but only on certain due process conditions. The conditions are so severe however, and the lawsuits it opens up for discounted ballots and challenging state procedures, that the end result will be no signature verification for absentee ballots
Much better.

Logical, specific, on target, and no Hitler reference.
:)
 
And there is the second Hitler reference.

As always, a Hitler reference is a sign that the rest of the argument is not worth listening to.

So no Caesar reference, no Hitler references. How about a Catherine the Great reference? What of Catherine had she put her fingers in her ears and not listened that her husband was about to throw her in prison?
 
Much better.

Logical, specific, on target, and no Hitler reference.

Thanks teach. Like not getting my paper back with red circles. Can you be any more condescending?

Seriously, I've made a sincere effort recently to treat you with civility and respect. Now you go off the rails again? What's with you? You are smart guy and better than this. Better than the rude, nasty condescending guy that shows up from time to time.
 
It's in 1621. Signatures are permitted but only on certain due process conditions. The conditions are so severe however, and the lawsuits it opens up for discounted ballots and challenging state procedures, that the end result will be no signature verification for absentee ballots

Your analysis does not match the actual wording of the Bill.
 
Thanks teach. Like not getting my paper back with red circles. Can you be any more condescending?

Seriously, I've made a sincere effort recently to treat you with civility and respect. Now you go off the rails again? What's with you? You are smart guy and better than this. Better than the rude, nasty condescending guy that shows up from time to time.
I was completely serious when I said I found certain language to be encouraging more divisiveness and violence.

We don't need more of that. This last year has been awful on both sides.

Chances are, I probably agree with you on HR1.

But there is a way to express it, and it does not include violent imagery.
 
I was completely serious when I said I found certain language to be encouraging more divisiveness and violence.

We don't need more of that. This last year has been awful on both sides.

Chances are, I probably agree with you on HR1.

But there is a way to express it, and it does not include violent imagery.

But that's the nature of a warning. If we continue to go down this road (by the actions of BOTH political parties), there's going to be bad things happen. We have to be very clear about what the consequences are if we stumble into it, and ignoring that reality isn't doing anyone any favors....it only makes an accidental trigger even more likely because no one is ready for it (just like no one was ready for what happened at the Capitol because they didn't think it could happen). I'm just approaching this like an adult, and treating you as one, by saying "look this is what's at stake here" instead of a child and saying "let's shield you from the harsh realities of the world".

I wish you would be honest with yourself that there are certain things you don't like to look at. This isn't the first time you've done this.
 
Back
Top