I don't think the who's who or number of groups is relevant, that's my point (and I can provide ample evidence of other left wing extremists that contributed to the violence). I could argue that far more acts of violence were committed by the left than the right, but that's irrelevant. I could also argue that on the whole Trump rally's were far more peaceful than BLM and Antifa protests...until they weren't. I could argue that the right responded immediately with law and order, while the left refused to when their constituents rioted. Those arguments are unproductive to resolving the problem of mob violence and political unrest. We have to stop fighting on that hill of whose violence is less heinous, or "more justified". We have to stop pretending there is some gray area of political violence, because there is not.
Maybe some Republicans are fighting for the votes of white nationalists, Qanon or right wing militias, I don't see that based on the almost universal condemnation from the Republicans of the violence (I'm excluding those that "condemned" with a wink and a nod).
Ok, so you're more concerned about mob violence as oppose to extremists viewpoints? So for example, someone rioting because they've hit a breaking point on police brutality (whether they're right or wrong) is a bigger concern than say someone that believes in white supremacy/nationalism but is generally peaceful?
I'm not trying to start an argument here. I'm genuinely trying to understand.