Girls Development Academy

US News and World Report Top 26 Universities
+
Southern California Girls Recruits 2016-2019 Graduation Years

1. Princeton: LA Premier 1, Surf 1, Real So Cal 1, Slammers 1
2. Harvard: WC 1, Blues 1
3. Yale: Blues 1
4. Columbia: Real So Cal 1, Eagles 1
5. Stanford: Strikers 2, Slammers 2, Eagles 1, Blues 3, WC 1, Real So Cal 3
6. University of Chicago: 0
7. M.I.T.: N/A
8. Duke: Surf 1, Slammers 1, Real So Cal 2
9. University of Pennsylvania : 0
10. California Institute of Technology: N/A
11. Johns Hopkins University: 0
12. Dartmouth: WC 1
13: Northwestern: Legends 1, Beach 1
14. Brown: Real So Cal 1, Beach 1
15: Cornell: 0
16. Vanderbilt: Slammers 1
17. Washington University in St. Louis: NA
18. Rice: WC 1
19. Notre Dame: Real So Cal 2, Blues 2, Slammers 1
20. Cal: Blues 1, Surf 2, Beach 1, Legends 2
21. Emory: 0
22. Georgetown: Surf 2
23. Carnegie Mellon: FRAM 1
24: UCLA: Surf 3, Blues 6, WC 3, Slammers 1
25. USC: Carlsbad United 1, Surf 2, Eagles 1, Slammers 1, Real So Cal 2, Beach 2, Blues 2
26. Virginia: 0

That's the scoreboard. Keep it in mind as you comment on clubs and coaches and players in So Cal. Carry on.

Of the current DA clubs on this list ....seeing patterns of productivity. Gettin the feelin like WC & RSC got the shaft.
 
US News and World Report Top 26 Universities
+
Southern California Girls Recruits 2016-2019 Graduation Years

1. Princeton: LA Premier 1, Surf 1, Real So Cal 1, Slammers 1
2. Harvard: WC 1, Blues 1
3. Yale: Blues 1
4. Columbia: Real So Cal 1, Eagles 1
5. Stanford: Strikers 2, Slammers 2, Eagles 1, Blues 3, WC 1, Real So Cal 3
6. University of Chicago: 0
7. M.I.T.: N/A
8. Duke: Surf 1, Slammers 1, Real So Cal 2
9. University of Pennsylvania : 0
10. California Institute of Technology: N/A
11. Johns Hopkins University: 0
12. Dartmouth: WC 1
13: Northwestern: Legends 1, Beach 1
14. Brown: Real So Cal 1, Beach 1
15: Cornell: 0
16. Vanderbilt: Slammers 1
17. Washington University in St. Louis: NA
18. Rice: WC 1
19. Notre Dame: Real So Cal 2, Blues 2, Slammers 1
20. Cal: Blues 1, Surf 2, Beach 1, Legends 2
21. Emory: 0
22. Georgetown: Surf 2
23. Carnegie Mellon: FRAM 1
24: UCLA: Surf 3, Blues 6, WC 3, Slammers 1
25. USC: Carlsbad United 1, Surf 2, Eagles 1, Slammers 1, Real So Cal 2, Beach 2, Blues 2
26. Virginia: 0

That's the scoreboard. Keep it in mind as you comment on clubs and coaches and players in So Cal. Carry on.

Beach had a Stanford and Blues had a University of Chicago in that time frame also (2016 grads) just to add to your list.-- I agree with your sentiment.
 
Of the current DA clubs on this list ....seeing patterns of productivity. Gettin the feelin like WC & RSC got the shaft.
While I understand your point, these are top educational schools. I bet USSF only cares about the top soccer schools. That list might be the same, though. I don't know.
 
Last edited:
While I understand your point, these are top educational schools. I bet USSF only cares about the top soccer schools. That list might be the same, though. I don't know.
It is surprising how well they correlate. The soccer school ranking do change 10-20 spots each year or two, but in general they are the same.
Who am I missing that are in both besides?
Duke, ND, Stanford, UNC, Virginia

This group I think need to make final four a few more times to be "both"
UCLA and USC
 
It is surprising how well they correlate. The soccer school ranking do change 10-20 spots each year or two, but in general they are the same.
Who am I missing that are in both besides?
Duke, ND, Stanford, UNC, Virginia

This group I think need to make final four a few more times to be "both"
UCLA and USC
UNC on the academic side is suspect....
 
I just read US Soccer is re-activating the boys residency program. I guess after a decade of Boys DA and still no super star, maybe Pulisic....then again he had to move to Dortmund at 16 years of age.

IMO, a US Soccer residency program is the BEST way to develop future national team players and potential pro soccer players. They are taking only the ELITE players who want to play professionally. They need to keep the players they want in the program, until they decide to cut the player for someone better. This way, the players get a compounding development effect.

They need to start a program for the girls too! Then all the leagues are just that club soccer leagues!

The Residency program never stopped so how could they reactivate it?
 
UNC on the academic side is suspect....
Yea - on the edge. But, like UCLA and USC all in the 20s rank (using my not favorite USA News ranking).
Need a thread on rankings how-they-do because some stuff may not be in-line with what parents value - but that is a different thread.
 
Also missing is a 2018 Upenn commit from surf.
What does it mean to "commit" to an Ivy League school? There are a ton of 5th year high schools that exist back east for kids that were deferred - including athletes. They "committed" to go as well. It's a meaningless term - let's stop using it.
 
What does it mean to "commit" to an Ivy League school? There are a ton of 5th year high schools that exist back east for kids that were deferred - including athletes. They "committed" to go as well. It's a meaningless term - let's stop using it.

It is still meaningful after NLI day.
 
US News and World Report Top 26 Universities
+
Southern California Girls Recruits 2016-2019 Graduation Years

1. Princeton: LA Premier 1, Surf 1, Real So Cal 1, Slammers 1
2. Harvard: WC 1, Blues 1
3. Yale: Blues 1
4. Columbia: Real So Cal 1, Eagles 1
5. Stanford: Strikers 2, Slammers 2, Eagles 1, Blues 3, WC 1, Real So Cal 3
6. University of Chicago: 0
7. M.I.T.: N/A
8. Duke: Surf 1, Slammers 1, Real So Cal 2
9. University of Pennsylvania : 0
10. California Institute of Technology: N/A
11. Johns Hopkins University: 0
12. Dartmouth: WC 1
13: Northwestern: Legends 1, Beach 1
14. Brown: Real So Cal 1, Beach 1
15: Cornell: 0
16. Vanderbilt: Slammers 1
17. Washington University in St. Louis: NA
18. Rice: WC 1
19. Notre Dame: Real So Cal 2, Blues 2, Slammers 1
20. Cal: Blues 1, Surf 2, Beach 1, Legends 2
21. Emory: 0
22. Georgetown: Surf 2
23. Carnegie Mellon: FRAM 1
24: UCLA: Surf 3, Blues 6, WC 3, Slammers 1
25. USC: Carlsbad United 1, Surf 2, Eagles 1, Slammers 1, Real So Cal 2, Beach 2, Blues 2
26. Virginia: 0

That's the scoreboard. Keep it in mind as you comment on clubs and coaches and players in So Cal. Carry on.

Missing from LA Premier:
1 Stanford 2016 (AK)
1 Harvard 2017 (CD)
 
What does it mean to "commit" to an Ivy League school? ...
A coach sponsors you. Meaning they tell you they will use you as one of their quota to get you through Admin. While they don't give money, they have only so many Admin will allow. It should come with a pre-admit reading from Admin and an e-mail indicating intent, referencing Admin. That was the process pretty much described at each school.

That is as good as any other commit as most commits come before signing day anyway and any athlete is late to the party if that falls through.

But - I agree commits on a Google spreadsheet are suspect. Many change.
 
What does it mean to "commit" to an Ivy League school? There are a ton of 5th year high schools that exist back east for kids that were deferred - including athletes. They "committed" to go as well. It's a meaningless term - let's stop using it.

Yes, there are several key 5th year college preps (i.e. Andover, Hotchkiss, Taft etc).....do you know of any Socal kids attending those that aren't on the list?

I suppose for arguments sake, all verbal "commits" are "meaningless" until you sign on the dotted line.
 
It is still meaningful after NLI day.
They don't have NLI because they don't give scholarships. But I would agree that the timing of NLI is when kids receive early admission or likely letters to Ivys. Then again, looking at the schools' actual rosters would make a lot more sense then looking at "commitment" lists.
 
Last edited:
They don't participate in NLI because they don't give scholarships. But I would agree that the timing of NLI is when kids receive early admission to Ivys. Then again, looking at the schools' actual rosters would make a lot more sense then looking at "commitment" lists.

A picture is worth more than a thousand words.....

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/photos-711929-day-events.html
Circa 2016:
o5l51d-b88684999z.120160413113431000g6ifv9tf.10.jpg
 
A coach sponsors you. Meaning they tell you they will use you as one of their quota to get you through Admin. While they don't give money, they have only so many Admin will allow. It should come with a pre-admit reading from Admin and an e-mail indicating intent, referencing Admin. That was the process pretty much described at each school.

That is as good as any other commit as most commits come before signing day anyway and any athlete is late to the party if that falls through.

But - I agree commits on a Google spreadsheet are suspect. Many change.
By league rule, this cannot happen until after July 1 before a kid's senior year (at the earliest). The "commitment" list includes kids much younger - rising juniors and sophomores. So either the commitment list is wrong or the term commitment is used differently than what you describe. I do agree with your description of the process, however. Although it is important to note that the level of support a coach gives varies substantially, and that can be the difference between getting in.

Let's look at the schools actual rosters!
 
Yes, there are several key 5th year college preps (i.e. Andover, Hotchkiss, Taft etc).....do you know of any Socal kids attending those that aren't on the list?

I suppose for arguments sake, all verbal "commits" are "meaningless" until you sign on the dotted line.
No, I don't know any current kids. But I did know several athletes that didn't get in after receiving a coaches "support" or had to go to 5th year high school. It's why it seems so crazy to me that sophomores or juniors would be on this list.
 
Back
Top