The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread


FBI Official Under Criminal Investigation For Allegedly Altering Document Used In Russia Probe
Bronson Stocking | Nov 21, 2019 7:30 PM

FBI Official Under Criminal Investigation For Allegedly Altering Document Used In Russia Probe

Source: AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
An FBI official is accused of altering a document related to the 2016 surveillance of former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page and is now under criminal investigation, CNN is reporting. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has reportedly turned over evidence of the document to federal prosecutor John Durham.


CNN reports that alterations to the document "were significant enough to have shifted the document's meaning and came up during a part of Horwitz's FISA review where details were classified, according to the sources."
In October, the Justice Department announced its administrative review into the origins of the Russia investigation had shifted into a criminal inquiry.
CNN reports, "Some witnesses who have been interviewed in Horowitz's investigation have said they expect the inspector general to find mistakes in the FBI's handling of the FISA process, but that those mistakes do not undermine the premise for the FBI's investigation."
How good is the premise of the investigation if an FBI official had to alter a document to pursue it?
Even CNN knows this is damning news for the Resistance.

"The possibility of a substantive change to an investigative document is likely to fuel accusations from President Donald Trump and his allies that the FBI committed wrongdoing in its investigation of connections between Russian election meddling and the Trump campaign," notes the CNN article.
It looks like Horowitz's report, which will be released next month, is going to be a doozy. Next, we need an investigation into the origins of the whistleblower complaint.
 
Trump Gets Win After California’s Supreme Court Nixes Law Requiring POTUS To Fork Over His Tax Returns
President Donald Trump (L) took aim at California Gov. Gavin Newsom's high-speed rail project on Twitter Feb. 13, 2019. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images and Stephen Lam/Getty Images

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images and Stephen Lam/Getty Images

Daily Caller News Foundation logo

CHRIS WHITETECH REPORTER
November 21, 20193:14 PM ET
California’s high court unanimously knocked down a recently passed state law requiring politicians to provide several years of tax returns before running for national office, CNN reported Thursday.
 
What a cunt.




Fiona Hill Worried Delay in Military Aid Would Put Ukraine at Risk; Why Did She Argue Against It In a 2015 Op-ed?
Posted at 3:45 pm on November 21, 2019 by Elizabeth Vaughn
Share

Tweet
50b82e2b-b48d-4972-9f16-41677e8d71ca-620x317.jpg

Former White House national security aide Fiona Hill, arrives to testify before the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 21, 2019, during a public impeachment hearing of President Donald Trump’s efforts to tie U.S. aid for Ukraine to investigations of his political opponents. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)



That was then and this is now. Dr. Fiona Hill, who until recently served as President Trump’s advisor on Soviet, Russian and European affairs, testified before the House impeachment inquiry committee on Thursday. She told lawmakers she had feared the delay of U.S. military aid would put Ukraine’s national security at risk. Hill said she’d been “concerned about Ukraine’s security and stability as it defended itself against Russia.”


Which is why Fox News’ Brett Baier found it interesting when he came across an op-ed Hill had co-written in 2015 in which she argued against providing lethal military aid for the country. The op-ed appeared in the Washington Post. She had been working at the super liberal Brookings Institution at the time.



Bret Baier

✔@BretBaier

https://twitter.com/BretBaier/status/1197558292349882369

Fiona Hill wrote an op-ed in 2015 for the Washington Post in which she argues against providing lethal military aid to Ukraine #FoxNews #ImpeachmentHearing

Embedded video


3,155

8:52 AM - Nov 21, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

2,296 people are talking about this




Hill’s piece is entitled “How aiding the Ukrainian military could push Putin into a regional war.” She argues:
The logic of sending weapons to Ukraine seems straightforward and is the same as the logic for economic sanctions: to change Vladimir Putin’s “calculus.” Increasing the Ukrainian army’s fighting capacity, the thinking goes, would allow it to kill more rebels and Russian soldiers, generating a backlash in Russia and ultimately forcing the Russian president to the negotiating table.
We strongly disagree…
It is hard to find effective alternatives to the current sanctions policy, but if we plunge headlong into sending weapons, we may lose our allies, and we may never have the opportunity to get things right.
When confronted with this op-ed, Hill told the committee, “Everybody changes their mind, you know, and kind of learns things. I, you know, was basically persuaded that, you know, this was actually worth doing.”


Yes, we all do change our minds. And many of those who responded to Baier’s tweet have pointed that out.


Still, it appears that Hill is more interested in opposing President Trump than she is about ensuring the safety of the Ukrainian troops.
Hill was hired by General Flynn during his short tenure as National Security Adviser. Her job was to present the President with intelligence and foreign policy options, not to make the decision.


If she is interested in setting U.S. policy, she should run for president.
 
“She wouldn’t hang my picture in the embassy”
When he wasn’t pushing conspiracy theories, Trump besmirched witnesses who testified to impeachment investigators, including former US Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, who was pushed out as part of the shadow foreign policy that Rudy Giuliani was conducting.

Trump claimed that Yovanovitch, who testified on Tuesday that Trump’s efforts to leverage the Ukrainian government into doing political favors for him was “not a security interest,” is “not an angel” because “she wouldn’t hang my picture in the embassy.”

That claim was almost immediately refuted by Yovanovitch’s lawyers, who told Geoff Bennett of NBC that “the Embassy in Kyiv hung the official photographs of the President, Vice President, and Secretary of State as soon as they arrived.”
 
The guy who died in 1972? You’re a bright guy, Ignorant Douchebag.

Man o man are you really that stupid..........Really " Messy " IDIOT.....
Are you really that stupid.....!

You have only your Obama phone, welfare payments and Lowe's boxes....

It's ok.....you get an A + for effort....
 
“She wouldn’t hang my picture in the embassy”
When he wasn’t pushing conspiracy theories, Trump besmirched witnesses who testified to impeachment investigators, including former US Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, who was pushed out as part of the shadow foreign policy that Rudy Giuliani was conducting.

Trump claimed that Yovanovitch, who testified on Tuesday that Trump’s efforts to leverage the Ukrainian government into doing political favors for him was “not a security interest,” is “not an angel” because “she wouldn’t hang my picture in the embassy.”

That claim was almost immediately refuted by Yovanovitch’s lawyers, who told Geoff Bennett of NBC that “the Embassy in Kyiv hung the official photographs of the President, Vice President, and Secretary of State as soon as they arrived.”
That will teach the lying bitch.
 
Lindsey Graham Launches Senate Probe into Bidens’ Burisma Actions
Former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter golfing in the Hamptons with Devon Archer, who served on the board of the Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings with Hunter.
Tucker Carlson TonightBREITBART NEWS22 Nov 20196,873
1:48
(UPI) — Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday requested State Department documents related to former Vice President Joe Biden’s communications with former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko.
Graham, R-S.C., sent a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo requesting the documents to assist in answering questions regarding allegations that Joe Biden was involved in the termination of Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin in order to end an investigation into natural gas company Burisma Holdings, where his son Hunter Biden served on the board.

The senator requested all documents and communications related to Joe Biden’s phone calls with Poroshenko on Feb. 11, 18 and 19, and March 22, 2016, citing media reports that they discussed previous demands to dismiss Shokin for alleged corruption before he was removed from office on March 29, 2016.

Graham also requested documents and communications between Joe Biden and his office and Poreshenko and his office between Feb. 2, 2016, when Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky’s home was raided and Shokin’s dismissal.

Lastly, Graham sought all documents and communications related to a meeting between Devon Archer, a business partner of Hunter Biden, and then-Secretary of State John Kerry on March 2, 2016.

Graham’s request comes after two weeks of public testimony on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, which centers around a whistle-blower’s complaint that Trump withheld military aid from Ukraine in an attempt to pressure newly elected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Burisma and the Bidens.
 
Lindsey Graham Launches Senate Probe into Bidens’ Burisma Actions
Former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter golfing in the Hamptons with Devon Archer, who served on the board of the Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings with Hunter.
Tucker Carlson TonightBREITBART NEWS22 Nov 20196,873
1:48
(UPI) — Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday requested State Department documents related to former Vice President Joe Biden’s communications with former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko.
Graham, R-S.C., sent a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo requesting the documents to assist in answering questions regarding allegations that Joe Biden was involved in the termination of Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin in order to end an investigation into natural gas company Burisma Holdings, where his son Hunter Biden served on the board.

The senator requested all documents and communications related to Joe Biden’s phone calls with Poroshenko on Feb. 11, 18 and 19, and March 22, 2016, citing media reports that they discussed previous demands to dismiss Shokin for alleged corruption before he was removed from office on March 29, 2016.

Graham also requested documents and communications between Joe Biden and his office and Poreshenko and his office between Feb. 2, 2016, when Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky’s home was raided and Shokin’s dismissal.

Lastly, Graham sought all documents and communications related to a meeting between Devon Archer, a business partner of Hunter Biden, and then-Secretary of State John Kerry on March 2, 2016.

Graham’s request comes after two weeks of public testimony on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, which centers around a whistle-blower’s complaint that Trump withheld military aid from Ukraine in an attempt to pressure newly elected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Burisma and the Bidens.
And? . . . and Biden scares you.
 
There used to be a debate among historians whether the Nixon, Harding, or Grant administrations were the most corrupt. The debate has been overcome by current events.
 
And? . . . and Biden scares you.
Scare? Pay to play bro like all the others. Joe is the one who said he knows nothing about his son Hunter. Hunter said he had no relations with his old girlfriend. They did "purity dating" which makes it impossible for him to have a child. He said, "I was never with her." However, unless the holy spirit was involved I think Hunter is the dad and should be a good dad. They took dna test and low and behold, we have a miracle or a lie? Joe has no comment about all this new revelations of a grand child because it's a peroneal matter and none of our beeswax.
 
Back
Top