The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread
- Thread starter Nonononono
- Start date
Sheriff Joe
DA
It sort of feels like 11-9-2016 in here this AM.
It's only going to hurt for a moment.
Too Funny.
It's only going to hurt for a moment.
Too Funny.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Ah yes the troll in chief, our conspiracy minded POTUS. He ranks right up there with some of the biggest buffoons of all time . . . when will he get the cool uniform?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Soul Train Ain't No Stopping Us Now McFadden and Whitehead ...
▶ 3:25
Sheriff Joe
DA
How much fun do you think Trump would have if this happened?
HILLARY EYES 20/20...
Clintons fly commercial...
What a pig.
HILLARY EYES 20/20...
Clintons fly commercial...
What a pig.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Come on, you guys are acting like your best friend just died.
It's only 1 supreme and he/she will only be on the court for 3 decades, how bad could it be?
It's only 1 supreme and he/she will only be on the court for 3 decades, how bad could it be?
Hüsker Dü
DA
Hüsker Dü
DA
Nutters don't comply with the law anyways . . . besides your namesakes refusal to uphold the law . . .
In her ruling, Robinson cited Kobach's "well-documented history" of avoiding the court's orders, noting an earlier opinion finding him in contempt.
http://myconnection.cox.com/article/politics/15a8c0e4-83a2-11e8-bef8-e3d3070e2cc0/
Sheriff Joe
DA
Who is McDonnell?No concern of mine, who mentioned that? McDonnell will pick a capable candidate.
Sheriff Joe
DA
He was upholding the law, that is why Holder and Obama went after him, gotta have those illegal votes ya see.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Typo, my bad I meant Ronald McDonald.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Trump's Personal Driver for 25 Years Sues for Unpaid Overtime
Christie Smythe 5 hours agoTrump’s driver of 25 years sues for thousands of hours of unpaid overtime
Donald Trump’s personal driver for more than 25 years says the billionaire real estate developer didn’t pay him overtime and raised his salary twice in 15 years, clawing back the second raise by cutting off his health benefits.
Noel Cintron, who is listed in public records as a registered Republican, sued the Trump Organization for about 3,300 of overtime that he says he worked in the past six years. He’s not allowed to sue for overtime prior to that due to the statute of limitations.
“In an utterly callous display of unwarranted privilege and entitlement and without even a minimal sense of noblesse oblige,” Trump and his businesses exploited the driver, Cintron says in the complaint.
Cintron says he was required to be on duty for Trump starting at 7 a.m. each day until whenever Trump, his family or business associates no longer required his services. He worked as long as 55 hours per week, but was paid a fixed salary of $62,700 in 2003, $68,000 in 2006, and $75,000 in 2010, according to the complaint.
The wage bump in 2010 came with a catch, Cintron said. He was induced to surrender his health insurance, saving Trump approximately $17,866 per year in premiums, according to the lawsuit.
"President Trump’s further callousness and cupidity is further demonstrated by the fact that while he is purportedly a billionaire, he has not given his personal driver a meaningful raise in over 12 years!" Cintron said.
Sheriff Joe
DA
It happens.
I wonder why Mr conservative or the pedofrile collaborator call you out on it?
Sheriff Joe
DA
I don't like doing predictions, but I predict tonight between 6:00 and 7:00 the world will come to an end, turn to MSNBC at 6 and let me know if I was right.
Sheriff Joe
DA
‘Unfortunate’: Ruth Bader Ginsburg believes it’s time to stop playing politics with judges
1 min
Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she hopes that "we will get back to the bipartisan spirit" when it comes to the congressional hearings for Supreme Court judges. (Robin Marchant/Getty Images)
As the looming announcement of President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee divides Washington along partisan lines, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg spoke fondly of a time when judge confirmations weren’t such a political battle, ABC News reported.
Ginsburg, speaking at a screening event in Jerusalem for a documentary about her life , recalled how different the process was when she was confirmed in 1993.
“I hope someday we will get back to the bipartisan spirit prevailing with respect to the confirmation of judges,” Ginsburg said.
What was different then?
Ginsburg told the crowd at the event that when she was confirmed, a candidate’s political history or affiliations were not such a strong factor swaying the voting.
{sounds like the democrats fucked it all up, according to RBG}
“I was considered by some a controversial person because of my affiliation with the American Civil Liberties Union,” Ginsburg said. “There wasn’t a single question asked of me during my hearings about my ACLU connections. the vote was 96-3. When Justice [Stephen] Breyer was nominated the next year, the vote for him was also in the 90s. Since then the Senate has tended to divide along party lines and I think that’s unfortunate. During my confirmation hearings, perhaps my biggest supporter was Orrin Hatch, the Republican senator from Utah.
“I hope someday we will get back to the bipartisan spirit prevailing with respect to the confirmation of judges,” she concluded.
Justice Breyer was confirmed by the Senate by a final vote of 87-
1 min
Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she hopes that "we will get back to the bipartisan spirit" when it comes to the congressional hearings for Supreme Court judges. (Robin Marchant/Getty Images)
As the looming announcement of President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee divides Washington along partisan lines, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg spoke fondly of a time when judge confirmations weren’t such a political battle, ABC News reported.
Ginsburg, speaking at a screening event in Jerusalem for a documentary about her life , recalled how different the process was when she was confirmed in 1993.
“I hope someday we will get back to the bipartisan spirit prevailing with respect to the confirmation of judges,” Ginsburg said.
What was different then?
Ginsburg told the crowd at the event that when she was confirmed, a candidate’s political history or affiliations were not such a strong factor swaying the voting.
{sounds like the democrats fucked it all up, according to RBG}
“I was considered by some a controversial person because of my affiliation with the American Civil Liberties Union,” Ginsburg said. “There wasn’t a single question asked of me during my hearings about my ACLU connections. the vote was 96-3. When Justice [Stephen] Breyer was nominated the next year, the vote for him was also in the 90s. Since then the Senate has tended to divide along party lines and I think that’s unfortunate. During my confirmation hearings, perhaps my biggest supporter was Orrin Hatch, the Republican senator from Utah.
“I hope someday we will get back to the bipartisan spirit prevailing with respect to the confirmation of judges,” she concluded.
Justice Breyer was confirmed by the Senate by a final vote of 87-
Hüsker Dü
DA
“Leonard Leo was a visionary,” said Tom Carter, who served as Leo’s media relations director when he was chairman of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), in an exclusive interview with The Daily Beast. “He figured out twenty years ago that conservatives had lost the culture war. Abortion, gay rights, contraception—conservatives didn’t have a chance if public opinion prevailed. So they needed to stack the courts.”
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...ederalist-society_us_5b354230e4b0f3c2219f4082
Sheriff Joe
DA
Now that's some fake news, you people will never learn.