The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

This guy will fit right in with you libs, build bridges, what a dumb fuck. Trump will eat him alive.
Howard Schultz Hits Trump on Trade: ‘Our Problem Is Not China’
15EmailGoogle+Twitter

GettyImages-56862791-640x480.jpg

China Photos/Getty Images
5 Jun 2018349
In his first sit-down interview since announcing plans to step down as Starbucks’ executive chairman, Howard Schultz said that he does not understand President Donald Trump’s trade battle with China and that the communist nation’s economic aggression is not a problem.
Schultz told CNBC Squawk Box co-host Andrew Ross Sorkin Tuesday that he is baffled by the Trump administration’s trade policy towards China.


“Going back to China and trade… this rhetoric about all these trade wars that are now being engaged with China, with Mexico, with Canada… this might sound like a trite line, but it’s important. We should not be in the business of building walls, we should be in the business of building bridges,” Schultz said.

“We are in a trade battle here that I do not understand. Our problem is not China. Our problem is here in the US we have $21 trillion in debt.”

Schultz, the founder of Starbucks Coffee, will step down as the company’s executive chairman on June 26.

“I’ll be thinking about a range of options for myself, from philanthropy to public service, but I’m a long way from knowing what the future holds,” Schultz wrote in a memo sent to employees.

Just days before announcing his departure, Schultz — the subject of much speculation about running for the White House in 2020 — blamed President Trump for America’s “racial divide.”

U.S. officials are negotiating with China in an effort to cut the $370 billion trade imbalance between the two countries.

The third round of trade talks between the world’s two largest economies appeared to fall short of bridging the gap between Beijing and Washington, which are at loggerheads over Chinese trade and industrial policy practices that US President Donald Trump says kill American jobs.

The discussions in Beijing, led by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Chinese Vice Premier Liu He, were intended to ease tensions after Washington said Tuesday it would follow through with tariffs on Chinese imports despite a truce reached between the two sides last month.

The planned U.S. trade sanctions on Beijing include restrictions on Chinese investment, export controls and 25 percent tariffs on $50 billion in tech
 
I know many conservatives, and you sir are no conservative. E is an old school conservative, you know, the ones with a moral backbone and unwavering belief in their ideology (not the latest version thereof).
I have watched some of the right side posters in here (the ones that have been here for the last almost ten years now) go from backing McCain to spitting on him. I have seen these same poster go from talking states rights and strict Constitutional law to backing federal intervention and obviously un-Constitutional actions.

The Republican President-elect's statements and policy proposals would blatantly violate the inalienable rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
https://www.aclu.org/issues/executive-branch/donald-trump-one-man-constitutional-crisis
https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/trump-and-the-constitution-a-year-in-review-and-our-coverage
http://www.newsweek.com/trump-impeachment-articles-president-constitution-720430
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/thom...consequences-for-his-unconstitutional-actions
Name the posters (plural, more than one, many) that have been here ten years that backed McCain & now spit on him.
Take your time douche bag.
 
Are you now saying you backed Obama?
I didn't mention Obama. WTF are you talking about?
You claim:
"I have watched some of the right side posters in here (the ones that have been here for the last almost ten years now) go from backing McCain to spitting on him".
Who are these posters that went from backing McCain to spitting on him?
Who?
 
I didn't mention Obama. WTF are you talking about?
You claim:
"I have watched some of the right side posters in here (the ones that have been here for the last almost ten years now) go from backing McCain to spitting on him".
Who are these posters that went from backing McCain to spitting on him?
Who?
Aff, dizzy and yourself . . . if you (meaning any of those list) don't speak up, silence shows implied consent. I certainly haven't heard any of you nut cases defending McCain.

Oh by the way, the staffer that made the inappropriate comment about McCain dying just got escorted from the White House, it's about time. An adult must have stepped in to make that decision for the man-child in chief.
 
I didn't mention Obama. WTF are you talking about?
You claim:
"I have watched some of the right side posters in here (the ones that have been here for the last almost ten years now) go from backing McCain to spitting on him".
Who are these posters that went from backing McCain to spitting on him?
Who?

What I read that to mean is he's saying it's weird that those same folks who voted for McCain for President, now take every opportunity to discount him. All because Trump said he didn't like him... almost like we were all back in high school.
 
Last edited:
McCain and Obama were the two major party candidates.

Funny that in 2012 you bet me an adult beverage that Romney would win, and you forgot all about it after the election . . .

If I remember correctly "aff" bet me that he'd never post in the Kitchen again if Obama won... and strangely he's still here. Welshing on bets seems to be a thing with some of these jokers.
 
If I remember correctly "aff" bet me that he'd never post in the Kitchen again if Obama won... and strangely he's still here. Welshing on bets seems to be a thing with some of these jokers.

I don't see his name .....Do you...
He must not be posting, you owe him.

The slang term is welch. The term Welshing is Very offensive to the Welsh people.


Of course you Democrats never consider others, only your selfish selves.
 
And just a head of the IG's report too.
Bromwich's letter also makes clear that McCabe is willing to provide emails that "demonstrate that Mr. McCabe advised former Director Comey, in October 2016, that Mr. McCabe was working with FBI colleagues to correct inaccuracies before certain media stories were published."
The discrepancy between Comey's recollection and McCabe's statements to internal investigators about authorizing FBI officials to talk to a reporter about an ongoing investigation regarding the Clinton Foundation in 2016 served as one of the linchpins to the inspector general's earlier report finding he "lacked candor."
 
And just a head of the IG's report too.
Bromwich's letter also makes clear that McCabe is willing to provide emails that "demonstrate that Mr. McCabe advised former Director Comey, in October 2016, that Mr. McCabe was working with FBI colleagues to correct inaccuracies before certain media stories were published."
The discrepancy between Comey's recollection and McCabe's statements to internal investigators about authorizing FBI officials to talk to a reporter about an ongoing investigation regarding the Clinton Foundation in 2016 served as one of the linchpins to the inspector general's earlier report finding he "lacked candor."

So what do you think about Trump saying he can pardon himself for any crime he commits?
 
Back
Top