You play in a controlled environment it won't show up until high school or the latter parts of the Championship season in whatever circuit you play in.
We play in the same circuit I believe.
You play in a controlled environment it won't show up until high school or the latter parts of the Championship season in whatever circuit you play in.
We play in the same circuit I believe.
We are two now as well- early stage though and I have not seen this decline I was warned of.
On some ways I feel like it's worse because we have so many "platforms" now
Aha. Now I understand the controlled environment statement and have to say I agree mostly.
I still believe the Academy curriculum will facilitate the drop off. I am only speaking of the way out Academy is being coached of course and using that as a marker. Not trying to get into that argument again
I absolutely understand your intent don't worry about me!
I was speaking more philosophically and wondering if we have seen a decrease in those drop offs due to the increase in available platforms for families to pursue.
In the past it seemed a little bit more funneled- and ECNL year start was a big drop off year. I have not seen that at all this year
I absolutely understand your intent don't worry about me!
I was speaking more philosophically and wondering if we have seen a decrease in those drop offs due to the increase in available platforms for families to pursue.
In the past it seemed a little bit more funneled- and ECNL year start was a big drop off year. I have not seen that at all this year
I absolutely understand your intent don't worry about me!
I was speaking more philosophically and wondering if we have seen a decrease in those drop offs due to the increase in available platforms for families to pursue.
In the past it seemed a little bit more funneled- and ECNL year start was a big drop off year. I have not seen that at all this year
You know what I am waiting for is someone savvy enough to sue both US Soccer and the clubs. In the pay to play system I as a customer am paying for a product. That product includes the coaching staff, the team and its team environment and the events that my team is in or has the potential to be in. In essence the devolpment environment for my kid and the exposure for my kid. If enough high level players are missing due to US Soccer I would say that environment is greatly reduced or destroyed. Hence breach of contract? Further since US Soccer doesn't give a shit about anybody but themselves I would figure out how to drag them through the mud. They certainly didn't give a crap about Manchester Cup, ECNL, High School or National championships?There are two reasons that you might not have seen it since I believe that you are truly paying attention.
1. You are at the beginning of the drop off.
There are lots of players, lots of teams and lots of leagues. Losing a player here or there on every team is pretty common especially when you consider how today is the age of having to switch teams every year due to some top down mandate. This is usually balanced out by new players coming onto a team from other clubs and new players entering club for the first time. This creates new teams which makes it seem endless. There becomes a point where many lower level players start giving up club for other activities (rec soccer, HS soccer, dance, lacrosse, rowing, etc.) especially if the expense is a considerable amount. At the beginning of the decline it really starts among the players that aren't trying to do something in/with soccer. It starts at the fringes with the players that aren't passionate about it. When you are in a crowd of people heading towards a ledge, it's easy to miss seeing the ledge. Especially when you are at the back. The shift is subtle but there is a shift happening.
2. The higher the level your player competes at the more you are insulated from the dropoff.
There are plenty of players that are not competing at the highest level yet and that are just waiting on the chance to take an available spot on a high level team. In addition there are top players that migrate to higher level teams later in the process for various reasons. This causes the rosters of the top teams in an age group to always be at capacity with a seemingly endless supply of mercenaries ready to come in and take an existing players minutes. On the highest levels roster sizes don't peak until U16/17 and it could be upwards of 25 players with 7 not getting to play. It is a " first world" problem. Plenty of the lower level teams barely have 15-16 players.
I'm going to clue you into some bad news about the top teams with the truly elite players. If you haven't already figured it out the top players tend to miss a lot of time for YNT camps which can significantly alter the outcome of individual games. With next year being a U17 WWC year I imagine some teams are going to be SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED.
Here is a way to describe it:
Think of now as a gradual decline in the number of overall players which leads to less teams. Think about club soccer as a huge multi room nightclub. When you are in the front part of the line and turn around it seems really busy. As you filter in and the club reaches capacity it's hard to tell how many people are in there especially if you get into the VIP room. People come and go throughout the night but at some point the amount of people leaving exceeds the amount coming in. It's still hard to notice all that if you are in the VIP room because that is always at its capacity. What you will notice is that even in the VIP room towards the end of the night the real ballers have after parties to go to and even that section is empty before the doors close.
Good luck to you and your player.
You know what I am waiting for is someone savvy enough to sue both US Soccer and the clubs. In the pay to play system I as a customer am paying for a product. That product includes the coaching staff, the team and its team environment and the events that my team is in or has the potential to be in. In essence the devolpment environment for my kid and the exposure for my kid. If enough high level players are missing due to US Soccer I would say that environment is greatly reduced or destroyed. Hence breach of contract? Further since US Soccer doesn't give a shit about anybody but themselves I would figure out how to drag them through the mud. They certainly didn't give a crap about Manchester Cup, ECNL, High School or National championships?
I might have a different perspective. My kid is one of those kids. My kid was ripped from a team that would have won Manchester Cup had not three left to go to camp - mine being one of those. A U14 camp which at the time is a "big deal" but looking back and becoming more wise (jaded) now can say it meant jack squat in the real scheme of things. US Soccer knew when the tournament was but they scheduled a camp anyways. Mine and other kids had to go cause if you don't well you wouldn't want to piss mother off shall we say. Not trying to be an egomaniac but that team was greatly reduced one those three players left for camp. All those parents paid a lot of money to be on a team to make that trip and I believe got short changed due to US Soccer. Have you figured out I don't care too much for them? And yes we have been on both ends. I just thru a bomb out there for the heck of it to see if there would be any discussion or reaction. The real topic is your second sentence. Who does the development? US Soccer or the clubs? The clubs. Why does US Soccer place themselves at the top of the pyramid if the clubs do the developing? Why is US Soccer calling the shots? Do you think the RFEF in Spain calls the shots? No the clubs call the shots. They decide if they will release "their players" to the National Team. Until that happens in the US the others will keep gaining and we will keep diminishing.Ok I don't get the rage. I thought the idea was to have players develop enough to go to those US Teams. I know the clubs love it because they get to advertise they are able to develop kids well and use them as the example. I understand politics play apart, but the clubs still get the free publicity and can recruit better players due to it.
I agree we play for development and need to receive it, but I don't see how this makes your point. Please explain.
I might have a different perspective. My kid is one of those kids. My kid was ripped from a team that would have won Manchester Cup had not three left to go to camp - mine being one of those. A U14 camp which at the time is a "big deal" but looking back and becoming more wise (jaded) now can say it meant jack squat in the real scheme of things. US Soccer knew when the tournament was but they scheduled a camp anyways. Mine and other kids had to go cause if you don't well you wouldn't want to piss mother off shall we say. Not trying to be an egomaniac but that team was greatly reduced one those three players left for camp. All those parents paid a lot of money to be on a team to make that trip and I believe got short changed due to US Soccer. Have you figured out I don't care too much for them? And yes we have been on both ends. I just thru a bomb out there for the heck of it to see if there would be any discussion or reaction. The real topic is your second sentence. Who does the development? US Soccer or the clubs? The clubs. Why does US Soccer place themselves at the top of the pyramid if the clubs do the developing? Why is US Soccer calling the shots? Do you think the RFEF in Spain calls the shots? No the clubs call the shots. They decide if they will release "their players" to the National Team. Until that happens in the US the others will keep gaining and we will keep diminishing.
I see your point. I don't put too much in winning tourneys like Manchester Cup and such, but my girl has tons of those championship medals and I was spoiled by that success and she puts more value in the experience in those games versus the medals. I know most kids play for and parents pay for those championships so your point is very clear.
I know a group of eligible girls just went to Mexico to participate in the Mexican OD Tourney. Every single one of those girls had to be released from their clubs. I'm not sure if that is the same for US Soccer camps and stuff.
Just making sure you know the former Nike Manchester Cup is different than the Manchester City Cup.
The Nike Manchester Cup was a invite only tournament for the best teams several years back and held at Nike headquarters.
Just making sure you know the former Nike Manchester Cup is different than the Manchester City Cup.
The Nike Manchester Cup was a invite only tournament for the best teams several years back and held at Nike headquarters.
I might have a different perspective. My kid is one of those kids. My kid was ripped from a team that would have won Manchester Cup had not three left to go to camp - mine being one of those. A U14 camp which at the time is a "big deal" but looking back and becoming more wise (jaded) now can say it meant jack squat in the real scheme of things. US Soccer knew when the tournament was but they scheduled a camp anyways. Mine and other kids had to go cause if you don't well you wouldn't want to piss mother off shall we say. Not trying to be an egomaniac but that team was greatly reduced one those three players left for camp. All those parents paid a lot of money to be on a team to make that trip and I believe got short changed due to US Soccer. Have you figured out I don't care too much for them? And yes we have been on both ends. I just thru a bomb out there for the heck of it to see if there would be any discussion or reaction. The real topic is your second sentence. Who does the development? US Soccer or the clubs? The clubs. Why does US Soccer place themselves at the top of the pyramid if the clubs do the developing? Why is US Soccer calling the shots? Do you think the RFEF in Spain calls the shots? No the clubs call the shots. They decide if they will release "their players" to the National Team. Until that happens in the US the others will keep gaining and we will keep diminishing.
Little Flea, if you understood the true purpose of US Soccer (not stated, but through actions), you might not get so upset. US Soccer has demonstrated that their only goal is to grow the income base, not necessarily the player base (GDA as an example) but if player base grows, it is merely a side benefit. Your passion for the sport has clouded your vision. Do you not see the posts on this board of all the parents praising the GDA and all its achievements? Really quite impressive when you consider that, for all real purposes, it hasn't even started yet. Having watched the implementation of Boys DA and seen what a disaster the results are, I fear that the USWNT, who was so dominant for so long, will continue it's decline on the world stage. What makes the rise of the European teams that much more impressive is that they are still years away from their culture fully buying into girls soccer. Yes, girls have been playing there for years but on average, the buy in is nothing like here in the states. I have yet to see a girls European U8 club circuit, but I digress.
To cite an example of your point about who calls the shots...didn't Schalke 04's refuse to release three American players (U20s, I think) for our Olympic qualifiers?
US Soccer continues to look for ways to get more dollars from the public's wallet without having to deliver results. What a business model. I don't expect to see that change anytime soon.