Most mass shooters buy their weapons legally. Las Vegas effectiveness was partially because of magazine size. The number of people killed at the Gabby Gifford shooting would have been less with a smaller magazine as the stoppage happened during a magazine swap. You have no constitutional right to 30 rounds in the magazine.
It doesn't make much of a difference, it only takes 2 or 3 seconds to swap magazines. Personally I can probably get off 25 or 30 shots on target with 1 pistol and that is with 3 10 rd magazines. If someone really wants to do some damage they only need a couple of pistols, 1 rifle and a few extra magazines.
2-3 seconds is a long time. That was what it took to stop the asshole in Tucson. Since you are so proficient, you don't need a magazine larger than 6 anyways. No loss to you.
No loss to be, but I believe it is called creep.
You arrest them. Does not even have to buy them on the black market. They can easily buy a 80% finished lower and make an untraceable gun. Still does not matter. Because people speed that does not mean we stop posting speed limits.
People speeding does not mean we confiscate their car....governor!
You don't have a constitutional right to own any weapon without limits, Governor. And people sometimes do get their cars confiscated, Governor. Even for speeding.
Can you please not call it the black market, hurts someone's feelings.
You want to stop speeders, put a governor on the motor Andy.
Most cars are governed for maximum speed and there are safety laws to add protection like seat belts or a "safety" switch.
Yeah. So?
If the point is to prevent people from buying an AR to kill people but they can still do it by purchasing the gun illegally what have you really accomplished? You said arrest them...is that before or after they used the illegally purchased gun to kill. You also posted that the Vegas shooter had purchased his guns legally. Do you think he would not have found a way to purchase his guns illegally if he had to?
Amazing how willing these libs are to kill the unborn and will fight for that right.
I already posted that there is no way to have a new assault weapons ban. I think that Democrats who pursue that are not dealing with reality.
