Ponderable

This fucking idiot has lost his mind,

Sen. McCain Flip-Flops on ‘Zero Tolerance,’ Now Urges Zero Enforcement
96EmailGoogle+Twitter

GettyImages-166912831-640x480.jpg

Alex Wong/Getty Images
19 Jun 20181,086
Sen. John McCain has joined the elite push to minimize enforcement of border laws and is calling the President to stop detaining migrants who bring children northwards.
McCain’s call to end enforcement came via a Tweet:


If federal border officials are denied the power to separate migrant parents from accompanying children, they will not be able to enforce immigration laws and unable to detain adult migrants as they move towards cheap-labor jobs in Democratic-dominated urban centers.

The denial would also mean that they cannot stop foreigners from enrolling their children in Americans’ schools — although few migrants will be able to register their children for schools in upper-income districts.

This easy migration policy is another flip by McCain, whose rhetoric was far different from his repeated advocacy for amnesty in Congress. In 2015, one year after he pushed for a huge “Gang of Eight” amnesty that would have legalized 30 million people in just ten years, and one year before his next election in 2016, he introduced a Resolution to be voted on by the Senate urging the restoration of a zero-tolerance border policy.

The 2015 resolution was submitted to the Senate to endorse “Operation Streamline” which prosecuted all migrants coming across the border in their home state. The program was so successful that President Barack Obama closed it down.

The Streamline program did not have to deal with migrants’ children because few migrants brought children into the zero-tolerance district.

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate regarding the success of Operation Streamline and the importance of prosecuting first time illegal border crossers.

Whereas the Border Patrol’s Yuma Sector has long grappled with the crossing of undocumented aliens and has seen illegal traffic decline precipitously from the early 2000s to the present …



Whereas a key to the success in the Yuma Sector has been the implementation of Operation Streamline, a program established in 2005 that was described by former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano as ‘‘a DHS partnership with the Department of Justice, . . . a geographically focused operation that aims to increase the consequences for illegally crossing the border by criminally prosecuting illegal border-crossers.’’;

Whereas known for its ‘‘zero-tolerance’’ approach, the Yuma County Sheriff’s Office cites 100 percent prosecution of illegal border crossers as a shared goal of a partnership including Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies;



Now, therefore, be it 1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—



(4) the Executive Branch should immediately remove any issued or related prohibition, policy, guidance, or direction to cease prosecuting first time illegal border crossers under Operation Streamline.

In a press statement, McCain declared:

WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Sens. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.), today introduced S. Res. 104, legislation expressing the sense of the Senate regarding Operation Streamline, a program that has seen success in reducing recidivism among illegal border crossers. The resolution, which is co-sponsored by U.S. Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), also calls on the Obama administration to immediately remove any directives or policies that would bar the prosecutions of first-time border crossers under this program.

Operation Streamline is a joint initiative administered by the departments of Homeland Security and Justice. In place since 2005, the program has been associated with a zero-tolerance approach, including criminally prosecuting illegal border crossers. It has been effective in the Border Patrol’s Yuma, Ariz., sector, with apprehensions dropping from 140,000 in 2005 – the year Operation Streamline was implemented – to less than 6,000 in 2014. By comparison, the Tucson sector, experienced more than 87,000 illegal crossings last year.



“Arizona’s Yuma Sector has gone from being one of the busiest sectors for illegal immigration in the U.S. to one of the most secure thanks to the stepped-up efforts of our law enforcement officials under Operation Streamline,” said McCain. “Despite this success, the Obama administration continues to scale back important progress by ceasing to prosecute illegal border crossers. The citizens of Arizona cannot afford to lose the gains that have been made to secure the southern border, and I will not stop fighting to ensure that we have the best policies in place to keep our communities safe.”

McCain also opposes President Donald Trump’s border wall, even though McCain ran for re-election in 2016 with a catchphrase, “Complete the danged fence”:
 
Outgoing Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) told NBC News that there are no seeming consequences for President Trump when he lies, cautioning that there would be "incredibly harmful" repercussions in Washington's future.

"There is no seeming consequence to the president and lies and it is going to have incredibly harmful consequences in the way that we operate going forward, based on the construct of the Founding Fathers," Sanford said in an interview with NBC's "Meet the Press," which is set to air on Sunday.


Hey Butt Picaroon ......you still have Rep Mark Sanford's Cell Phone number...
Yeah you do.....call him up and ask him if he's gunna marry that Argentinian Gal
he ruined his marriage with...you know the one he lied his ass off about. Yes that
one....oh Maria....Maria oh Maria....He got lost hiking and lost his mind for a
Looooooong time....

Yeah he's credible.....like your posts...
 


Ahhhh....but Huma didn't ignore her " Insurance " policy embedded
deep in a double partition in the laptop !

The contents of that Laptop would Fry the Clinton's and many of her
" associates "....but alas that " Insurance " has a sting element to it also !

Huma may be a " kept " woman, but she's no dummy....I'll bet many a
Rhino is lurking in those files too. That's probably why HRC walks about
Free !
 
All four living former first ladies condemn Trump border policy
Hillary Clinton denounced the administration for citing the Bible in its defense, saying, "Jesus Christ said, 'Suffer the little children unto me' not 'let the little children suffer.'"

Meanwhile, Bush, who almost never speaks out on political issues, broke partisan ranks in a Washington Post op-ed.

“I live in a border state. I appreciate the need to enforce and protect our international boundaries, but this zero-tolerance policy is cruel. It is immoral. And it breaks my heart,” she wrote.

Rosalynn Carter called the policy of separating families "disgraceful and a shame to our country."

Michelle Obama also weighed in to support Bush.

Sometimes truth transcends party. https://t.co/TeFM7NmNzU

— Michelle Obama (@MichelleObama) June 18, 2018

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...arating-families-border-cruel-immoral-n884136

And Melania Trump said put me down for whatever Michelle Obama said.
So why did the Dems just reject a silution to the problem. Could it be because mid terms are coming up? Nah... the Dems would never do that.
 
All four living former first ladies condemn Trump border policy
Hillary Clinton denounced the administration for citing the Bible in its defense, saying, "Jesus Christ said, 'Suffer the little children unto me' not 'let the little children suffer.'"

Meanwhile, Bush, who almost never speaks out on political issues, broke partisan ranks in a Washington Post op-ed.

“I live in a border state. I appreciate the need to enforce and protect our international boundaries, but this zero-tolerance policy is cruel. It is immoral. And it breaks my heart,” she wrote.

Rosalynn Carter called the policy of separating families "disgraceful and a shame to our country."

Michelle Obama also weighed in to support Bush.

Sometimes truth transcends party. https://t.co/TeFM7NmNzU

— Michelle Obama (@MichelleObama) June 18, 2018

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...arating-families-border-cruel-immoral-n884136

And Melania Trump said put me down for whatever Michelle Obama said.


Levin Rips Laura Bush For Comments On Immigration: ‘Shame On You’
7 hours ago
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...BlgQqUMITDAJ&usg=AOvVaw128Qi-_TegBTwtGltc8CQR
 
June 20, 2018
Christopher Cuomo surpasses Juan Williams in stupidity
By J. Marsolo
Years ago, when Saturday Night Live was funny, Bill Murray did a skit in Spanish titled, "¿Quién es más macho, Fernando Lamas o Ricardo Montalbán?"

A current skit should be "¿Quién es más estúpido, Christopher Cuomo o Juan Williams?"

Juan took the lead when he said he did not know about Chappaquiddick. Imagine a longtime TV journalist who does not know about Teddy Kennedy, the Lion of the Senate, driving off a bridge and leaving Mary Joe Kopechne to die in the submerged car.

But Christopher Cuomo, a worthy challenger, may have surpassed Juan. Cuomo, the Freddo of the Cuomo family, tried to take on the brilliant and fearless Kellyanne Conway regarding the current Dem-media obsession with the enforcement of our border laws. The Dems and media are trying to divert attention from the I.G. report of the corrupt Comey investigation of Hillary, which is tied to the corrupt Mueller investigation. Ms. Conway does not back down from the Cuomo types. She should be attorney general.


Ms. Conway tried to explain that we are enforcing the laws, which means we arrest those who cross illegally. This means that if the illegals have children with them, the arrest logically separates the children from the illegals who are arrested. This happens every day in every courtroom in the USA when a person is convicted and sent to prison. It results in separation of the parent from the child. For example, Paul Manafort was just separated from his family, even though he has not been convicted. He just had his bail revoked.

Cuomo ranted the usual Dem-media talking points about the terrible, inhumane Trump. Ms. Conway calmly explained how the law, passed by Congress, operates. It is not that complicated. If one violates the law, then arrest and prosecution follow. She asked Cuomo what the Dem-media proposal is, to which he had no answer.

Finally, Cuomo said, why don't you round up the jaywalkers? They make my life worse than illegal aliens.

There you have it. Cuomo believes that jaywalkers are a bigger threat than illegal aliens.

I vote for Christopher Freddo Cuomo. Más estúpido.

Years ago, when Saturday Night Live was funny, Bill Murray did a skit in Spanish titled, "¿Quién es más macho, Fernando Lamas o Ricardo Montalbán?"

A current skit should be "¿Quién es más estúpido, Christopher Cuomo o Juan Williams?"

Juan took the lead when he said he did not know about Chappaquiddick. Imagine a longtime TV journalist who does not know about Teddy Kennedy, the Lion of the Senate, driving off a bridge and leaving Mary Joe Kopechne to die in the submerged car.

But Christopher Cuomo, a worthy challenger, may have surpassed Juan. Cuomo, the Freddo of the Cuomo family, tried to take on the brilliant and fearless Kellyanne Conway regarding the current Dem-media obsession with the enforcement of our border laws. The Dems and media are trying to divert attention from the I.G. report of the corrupt Comey investigation of Hillary, which is tied to the corrupt Mueller investigation. Ms. Conway does not back down from the Cuomo types. She should be attorney general.


Ms. Conway tried to explain that we are enforcing the laws, which means we arrest those who cross illegally. This means that if the illegals have children with them, the arrest logically separates the children from the illegals who are arrested. This happens every day in every courtroom in the USA when a person is convicted and sent to prison. It results in separation of the parent from the child. For example, Paul Manafort was just separated from his family, even though he has not been convicted. He just had his bail revoked.

Cuomo ranted the usual Dem-media talking points about the terrible, inhumane Trump. Ms. Conway calmly explained how the law, passed by Congress, operates. It is not that complicated. If one violates the law, then arrest and prosecution follow. She asked Cuomo what the Dem-media proposal is, to which he had no answer.

Finally, Cuomo said, why don't you round up the jaywalkers? They make my life worse than illegal aliens.

There you have it. Cuomo believes that jaywalkers are a bigger threat than illegal aliens.

I vote for Christopher Freddo Cuomo. Más estúpido.



Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/06/christopher_cuomo_surpasses_juan_williams_in_stupidity.html#ixzz5IyPbxDph
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
 
"The closing stores are often in “major metro areas where increases in wage and occupancy and other regulatory requirements” are making them unprofitable, Johnson said."

Geee Who knew? Lol! Labor Markets Baby.

The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to man how little he (politicians) knows about what he imagines he can design.--F.A. Hayek
Update: My friend Erick Erickson skewers the story by noting that “150 Starbucks homeless shelters set to close,” but argues that the decline has more to do with social-justice-warrior posturing:
Razor‏ @hale_razor 17h17 hours ago




Social Justice Company Opens Bathrooms but Closes 150 Storespic.twitter.com/N4pIZh4Cds

DgFgYHaW4AAX_Hc.jpg

3:03 PM - 19 Jun 2018

In March of 2015, Starbucks launched its “Race Together” program where its billionaire white liberal CEO decided its employees would talk about race in America and try to bring unity over an overpriced crap tasting latte. It has been downhill ever since for Starbucks.



There’s a correlation here, but I’m not sure it shows causation. The decline began a few years earlier; look at the plateau levels in 2010, 2012, and 2014, and note how they keep getting progressively lower, pun intended. The decline began accelerating after Schulz’ decision to serve up lectures to customers along with overpriced and overburnt coffee, but the most that can be said is that it may have exacerbated an already existing trend.
 
So why did the Dems just reject a solution to the problem. Could it be because mid terms are coming up? Nah... the Dems would never do that.


Oh boy Multi....You just hit the Nail on the head, the Democrats have painted
themselves into a corner with non drying paint, no rags, no thinner, no open
window nearby.....Nothing.....they are at their last straw ! ( Violence ) mark my
words....
 
Back
Top