Double knots.You can't hold all them cards if you have to tie your shoes.
Double knots.You can't hold all them cards if you have to tie your shoes.
GODWIN, you people are desperate.
Keep grinding, rat.
You're fertilizing the base.
OUR base.
. . . and his post seems to have struck a nerve. Remember when you were that guy supporting The Constitution? That was so before Nov. 2016.Your shoes are untied.
Come on, he is a croc wearing kook.Your shoes are untied.
Maybe if you reference some white supremacy literature you will find the meaning.What do you mean by "GODWIN"?
Says the back up your sources King.Maybe if you reference some white supremacy literature you will find the meaning.
Maybe if you reference some white supremacy literature you will find the meaning.
Kinda hurt you did I? You make it so obvious. Call it tough love, you need to learn from it and better yourself . . . I almost spit coffee just there.Says the back up your sources King.
Not hard to figure out if you understand context.There is a sociological effect called Godwin's Law that the plumber may have been referring to, but there are also many derivative threads of meaning that have been derived from that. I'm just wondering which definition he has in mind.
Exhibit A-1Maybe if you reference some white supremacy literature you will find the meaning.
Not hard to figure out if you understand context.
Do you need me to draw a picture?
Around here it is the starting point.Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Hitler analogies)[1][2] is an Internet adage that asserts that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1";[2][3] that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Adolf Hitler or his deeds. Promulgated by the American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990,[2] Godwin's law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions.[4] It is now applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric[5][6]where reductio ad Hitlerum occurs.
From both sides . . . after one of yours infers that there is nothing wrong with nazis, white supremacists or other racist hate groups and that is those that protest them that are at fault. Then of course you try the "I know you are but what am I defense" that worked so well up until 2nd grade.Around here it is the starting point.
Fake News.From both sides . . . after one of yours infers that there is nothing wrong with nazis, white supremacists or other racist hate groups and that is those that protest them that are at fault. Then of course you try the "I know you are but what am I defense" that worked so well up until 2nd grade.
That confirms it from your end.Fake News.
Kinda. It made me feel like you didnʻt pay attention to your preaching of adherence to backing up what you say. I’m over it though.Kinda hurt you did I? You make it so obvious. Call it tough love, you need to learn from it and better yourself . . . I almost spit coffee just there.
Too bad you never gave an examples of me doing that, because you have none . . . like always.Kinda. It made me feel like you didnʻt pay attention to your preaching of adherence to backing up what you say. I’m over it though.
Ohhh Nancy... please provide the post that anyone on the right here has said Nazis are good. You see, that's why you're so messed up, you buy into all the fake news even when it does not exist.From both sides . . . after one of yours infers that there is nothing wrong with nazis, white supremacists or other racist hate groups and that is those that protest them that are at fault. Then of course you try the "I know you are but what am I defense" that worked so well up until 2nd grade.
That is part of the democrats platform, the main part. Lying.Ohhh Nancy... please provide the post that anyone on the right here has said Nazis are good. You see, that's why you're so messed up, you buy into all the fake news even when it does not exist.