In the greater scheme of things youth sports is a very low priority, one of the last things to receive guidance, not even listed on what's open or not state on the State covid19 site.
I think almost everybody can agree that we want to see outdoor youth sports going again to include not only training but scrimmages and games also. Tournaments mixed response so it's the set those aside for now.
So what are we arguing about? Politics covid-19 health science, statistics,what other states, nations are doing, categorizing people of this or that.
The bigger picture is working together not arguing on what? Buliding the bridges and removing the road blocks.
The camp workaround was a temporary bridge that was worked for some, the state youth sports guidance came down creating more roadblocks.
So how to we make forward progress? Either get the state youth sports guidance updated or work with local heath depts to create more bridges or remove the roadblocks. Hopefully some of the sanctioning bodies will work with the clubs to get this done. For example how about purposing allowing youth sports outdoor scrimmages for counties outside the widespread or purple classification for x weeks and then progressing to games after x more if those places stay in the moderate class or something?
Let's find more solutions less arguments, covid19 is not going away and we need to get on with it, we've learned to live with everything else so now it's time to move forward and do something. If we have to modify things like Massachusetts so be it but let's not get stuck on the semantics or the arguments. Outdoor youth sports is lower risk when when people don't congregate so space the games out and make people sit 6ft apart just like they do at restaurants for example, create a cleaning hygiene routine, etc.