Whistleblower

Bruddah IZ said:
Remind me why it is mandated that tax payers provide funding for Ukraines defense but not money for ongoing and updated construction of a wall on our Southern Border. Quid pro quo? So Hunter Biden making 50k a month to fund his Dad’s campaign is not a concern for you? Some due diligence seems reasonable to me.
Click to expand...
Huh?
 
Nonononono said:
A good time to summarize the Whistleblower scandal to date. And just undisputed facts unless otherwise noted.

Trump personally orchestrated a quid pro quo extortion plot in which he would withhold congress-mandated essential military defense aid to our ally, Ukraine, in exchange for Ukraine’s President announcing publicly, and undertaking an investigation into Joe Biden. This is a violation of federal law, and under careful consideration as an abuse of power.

Present and former State Department officials, some career diplomats, others political appointees loyal to Trump have so stated under oath before congressional committees. The call summary, erroneously referred to as the call transcript, further support the quid pro quo crime. The initial complaint has proven true in all material aspects.

There is no set of rules or procedures that exist under which the House is obligated by law to follow in undertaking an impeachment inquiry, apart from the broad authority stated in the US Constitution, and dissimilar prior impeachment inquiries initially undertaken by the DOJ, then presented to Congress to consider. At best, prior impeachment inquiry protocols are arguably only persuasive, rather than binding precedent. Trump’s supporters have abandoned the initial defense of no quid pro quo, and now grasp to differences in how prior impeachment inquiries were conducted, albeit under quite different circumstances and procedures of prosecution.

Here, AG Barr elected to dispose of the Whistleblower complaint, and not undertake any inquiry. That left it to Congress to initiate the inquiry.

So there we are. Corroborated testimony from a myriad of witnesses, many loyal to Trump, that reveal the illegal Trump quid pro quo scheme a crime, and therefore subject to the consideration of the House to impeach, and the Senate to try and remove Trump.

Rather than a popularly expounded talking point that this process is an attempt to undue an election, should Trump be removed, it would be an entirely constitutional exercise, with the elected Vice President to assume the office of President. No coup, only a constitutional exercise in democracy.
Click to expand...


Bob's " trying " to make a LIE serious.........!!!


https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlw9pklOynYjGmnGO9L-aCWilyIebRCjjna8sfLHVPIjiipvsd&s
 
The press gets hold of some nugget of information and can't just shut up. Even if it is better for everyone to keep quiet so some moron won't know about it . Now everyone knows that commercial aircraft have "hijack buttons".

www.mirror.co.uk

Schiphol Airport locked down after plane hijack button 'pressed by mistake'

Air Europa confirmed this evening that a pilot on board a flight bound for Madrid accidentally pressed a button which alerts authorities about a suspected hijacking
www.mirror.co.uk www.mirror.co.uk
 
messy said:
I don't think any of it was found false, actually. Jesus, does anybody close to Trump not end up in the pokey?
Click to expand...

I generally don't give much credit to its original oranges, The Washington Free Beacon (google it). However, some of the accusations were verified by the Mueller report, other parts were disproven.
 
Multi Sport said:
Clueless as usual Sunshine... crash and burn!!!! Lol!!!
Click to expand...
Not only was the dossier true, not only do Trump's cronies end up in jail, but do Republicans win anywhere outside of Trump? How do you feel here in the great state of California? Lonely? LOL!
 
Next week, when the impeachment goes on TV and all the Trumpies stick with him, the Republicans will continue to lose the public...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top