Bruddah IZ
DA
Indeed.
Whistleblower
- Thread starter Nonononono
- Start date
Bruddah IZ
DA
I thought it was the russians that gave her a bad name.
Multi Sport
DA
Who needs written proof when you can pull up the video yourself. Your beginning to act and sound a lot like Sunshine...
Multi Sport
DA
Was that recorded, like the phone call was? Or is this more information similar to the Steele dossier or SCOTUS accuser? You would have thought that with this being such a slam dunk for impeachment that ALL of the Democrats would have voted in favor of moving forward, right? But that didn't even happen...
Huh? Impeachment proceedings, public, with facts. Deal with it, pumpkin.
Multi Sport
DA
Glad to see your still trying but you're having problems following along... can't help you there Sunshine.
Man are YOU stupid.........
It's NOT an Impeachment ! ( It's a sham Impeachment inquiry )
It's NOT public unless EVERY DETAIL is made public....!
It has NO FACTS whatsoever .....It is a LIE ! Read the phone transcript.
It's being dealt with, and DEMOCRATS WILL HANG FROM THE GALLOWS FOR THIS COUP.
Halloween was past @ 9:33 PM Jackass.....Deal with THE NEW DAY !
Nonononono
PREMIER
So that's what he meant by nice hair.
Nonononono
PREMIER
Let’s just be glad neither of Rudy’s two fine young associates don’t turn to rats.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Maybe they know who the Whistler is.
Already are!
They are just " Biden " their time before they spill the beans on the
corruption the DEMOCRATS are involved in.............." Biden " their time....Blustery Bob...
Nonononono
PREMIER
A good time to summarize the Whistleblower scandal to date. And just undisputed facts unless otherwise noted.
Trump personally orchestrated a quid pro quo extortion plot in which he would withhold congress-mandated essential military defense aid to our ally, Ukraine, in exchange for Ukraine’s President announcing publicly, and undertaking an investigation into Joe Biden. This is a violation of federal law, and under careful consideration as an abuse of power.
Present and former State Department officials, some career diplomats, others political appointees loyal to Trump have so stated under oath before congressional committees. The call summary, erroneously referred to as the call transcript, further support the quid pro quo crime. The initial complaint has proven true in all material aspects.
There is no set of rules or procedures that exist under which the House is obligated by law to follow in undertaking an impeachment inquiry, apart from the broad authority stated in the US Constitution, and dissimilar prior impeachment inquiries initially undertaken by the DOJ, then presented to Congress to consider. At best, prior impeachment inquiry protocols are arguably only persuasive, rather than binding precedent. Trump’s supporters have abandoned the initial defense of no quid pro quo, and now grasp to differences in how prior impeachment inquiries were conducted, albeit under quite different circumstances and procedures of prosecution.
Here, AG Barr elected to dispose of the Whistleblower complaint, and not undertake any inquiry. That left it to Congress to initiate the inquiry.
So there we are. Corroborated testimony from a myriad of witnesses, many loyal to Trump, that reveal the illegal Trump quid pro quo scheme a crime, and therefore subject to the consideration of the House to impeach, and the Senate to try and remove Trump.
Rather than a popularly expounded talking point that this process is an attempt to undue an election, should Trump be removed, it would be an entirely constitutional exercise, with the elected Vice President to assume the office of President. No coup, only a constitutional exercise in democracy.
Trump personally orchestrated a quid pro quo extortion plot in which he would withhold congress-mandated essential military defense aid to our ally, Ukraine, in exchange for Ukraine’s President announcing publicly, and undertaking an investigation into Joe Biden. This is a violation of federal law, and under careful consideration as an abuse of power.
Present and former State Department officials, some career diplomats, others political appointees loyal to Trump have so stated under oath before congressional committees. The call summary, erroneously referred to as the call transcript, further support the quid pro quo crime. The initial complaint has proven true in all material aspects.
There is no set of rules or procedures that exist under which the House is obligated by law to follow in undertaking an impeachment inquiry, apart from the broad authority stated in the US Constitution, and dissimilar prior impeachment inquiries initially undertaken by the DOJ, then presented to Congress to consider. At best, prior impeachment inquiry protocols are arguably only persuasive, rather than binding precedent. Trump’s supporters have abandoned the initial defense of no quid pro quo, and now grasp to differences in how prior impeachment inquiries were conducted, albeit under quite different circumstances and procedures of prosecution.
Here, AG Barr elected to dispose of the Whistleblower complaint, and not undertake any inquiry. That left it to Congress to initiate the inquiry.
So there we are. Corroborated testimony from a myriad of witnesses, many loyal to Trump, that reveal the illegal Trump quid pro quo scheme a crime, and therefore subject to the consideration of the House to impeach, and the Senate to try and remove Trump.
Rather than a popularly expounded talking point that this process is an attempt to undue an election, should Trump be removed, it would be an entirely constitutional exercise, with the elected Vice President to assume the office of President. No coup, only a constitutional exercise in democracy.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Remind me why it is mandated that tax payers provide funding for Ukraines defense but not money for ongoing and updated construction of a wall on our Southern Border. Quid pro quo? So Hunter Biden making 50k a month to fund his Dad’s campaign is not a concern for you? Some due diligence seems reasonable to me.
Coocoo
Nonononono
PREMIER
You are free to start an alternative fact thread to expound irrelevant information. Should you have questions about the actual Whistleblower scandal here in the real world, I’m sure you’ll get a response to your queries.