Where does a football coach conduct his instruction?
"We the People..."
- Thread starter espola
- Start date
Syllabus
KENNEDY v. BREMERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
The District Court found that the “‘sole reason’” for the District’s decision to suspend Mr. Kennedy was its perceived “risk of constitutional liability” under the Establishment Clause for his “religious conduct” after three games in October 2015
Last edited:
Ask Daffy he's the genius that posted nonsense about a teacher praying in a classroom.....that was decided back in 1962....
But, a football coach doesn't "conduct" his instruction after the game alone...
Last edited:
It seems that you agree with me.
The statements that Coach Kennedy made about his behavior do not match the evidence presented in news reports and the courts. Gorsuch chose to ignore the facts and simply repeat Kennedy's claims.
And you're still a sucker for believing him.
Hüsker Dü
DA
We are in a bad place when even members of the SCOTUS are habitual liars and have millions of willing enablers.
Pot meet kettle.
I agree that The District Court found that the “‘sole reason’” for the District’s decision to suspend Mr. Kennedy was its perceived “risk of constitutional liability” under the Establishment Clause for his “religious conduct” after three games in October 2015
Well then apparently your ignorant for believing he lied...
That is part of the flawed analysis of the case that Gorsuch et al used to justify their final opinion.
Your repeated demonstrations of ignorance by claiming that this is something other than what it actually is do not displease me.
Last edited:
Who do think wrote the certiorari ?
Clue: It wasn't Gorsuch...
Your repeated demonstrations of ignorance by claiming that this is something other than what it actually is do not displease me.
We all anxiously await your further explanation of the workings of crafting SCOTUS written opinions.
Earlier, before I rubbed your nose in your obvious errors, you claimed that the passage you quoted came from the 9th Circuit Court. Explain why you would be led to think that the 9th Circuit would write a document so dismissive of their own opinion. Were you influenced by another writer? Or did you come to that boneheaded opinion all by yourself? You can start from there and explain how those errors ended up in the certioriari preface to the SCOTUS opinion if not under Gorsuch's influence or authorship.
Last edited:
Let me help you get started on your assignment by linking in the actual 9th Circuit opinion, not the mangled version that appears in Gorsuch's opinion.
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, No. 20-35222 (9th Cir. 2021)
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment for the school district in an action brought by plaintiff, a former high school football coach, alleging violation of his rights under the First Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when the school...
law.justia.com
Quoting in part --
The panel held that the record before it and binding Supreme Court precedent compelled the conclusion that the District would have violated the Establishment Clause by allowing Kennedy to engage in the religious activity he sought. Kennedy’s attempts to draw nationwide attention to his challenge to the District showed that he was not engaging in private prayer. Instead, he was engaging in public speech of an overtly religious nature while performing his job duties. The District tried to accommodate Kennedy, but that was spurned by Kennedy insisting that he be allowed to pray immediately after the conclusion of each game, potentially surrounded by students.
Last edited:
Potentially surrounded.....Let me help you get started on your assignment by linking in the actual 9th Circuit opinion, not the mangled version that appears in Gorsuch's opinion.
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, No. 20-35222 (9th Cir. 2021)
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment for the school district in an action brought by plaintiff, a former high school football coach, alleging violation of his rights under the First Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when the school...
Quoting in part --
The panel held that the record before it and binding Supreme Court precedent compelled the conclusion that the District would have violated the Establishment Clause by allowing Kennedy to engage in the religious activity he sought. Kennedy’s attempts to draw nationwide attention to his challenge to the District showed that he was not engaging in private prayer. Instead, he was engaging in public speech of an overtly religious nature while performing his job duties. The District tried to accommodate Kennedy, but that was spurned by Kennedy insisting that he be allowed to pray immediately after the conclusion of each game, potentially surrounded by students.
Have you figured out the difference between the 9th Circuit and the SCOTUS yet?
Sure...Magoo
The 9th Circuit Court is reversed more than any other Circuit Court.
79.2 % of the 9th Circuit cases that are reviewed by SCOTUS are reversed
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District was just one of those cases.
Feel free to join in the after game prayer...
thirteenknots
SILVER ELITE
What if YOU told the TRUTH.
thirteenknots
SILVER ELITE
One is Corrupted and the other just made some Historic rulings.
It appears you have decided to deflect the discussion as you run away from your earlier errors.
This time I took you down the rabbit hole....how'd you like that Magoo?
This is the kind shit you pull almost daily......ahh...funny shit huh?