You should listen to his interview with Dr Gupta. 3hrs is a long time but it goes by fast and enlightening to all sides of this “debate”.
Another sleazeball.
You should listen to his interview with Dr Gupta. 3hrs is a long time but it goes by fast and enlightening to all sides of this “debate”.
We've already had the discussion re ad-hominems. Per the test espola set out, they aren't ads as they don't go to your character, only the nature of your arguments. Therefore they have his blessing.
The humanities degree qualifies you to bullshit with confidence, but nothing more.
You should listen to his interview with Dr Gupta. 3hrs is a long time but it goes by fast and enlightening to all sides of this “debate”.
Do you then wonder why some 3% of scientists are climate change deniers? The ones on fossil fuel payrolls (although they know the truth).These days experience seems to be irrelevant. Which side you row for appears to trump experience. Academic scientists/MDs are usually bought and paid for by entities that don't really care about health outcomes. It's a common phenomenom that's always occured outside the limelight. oh how times have changed.
Guess it takes one to know one……Another sleazeball.
Free on SpotifyLol.. is there a paywall?
One is left to assume you have your reasons for lashing out. Is there a reason you choose to be an asshole or is it natural?Guess it takes one to know one……
This may be your best take ever. He would appreciate your position.If that is so, then, I'm sure he would appreciate my position.
What lies? Again, interesting take if you've never listened? I'm assuming you are taking exception with the Dr. Malone interview. Just curious as to what you think the lies are?He makes a living stirring up idiots with lies.
Where did you get this 3% from? All scientists? Climate peeps? Who are these scientists? Of course a "scientist" that works for Exxon, etc would lean pro-fossil fuel. Besides, where would we be with the leaky vaccines if it wasn't for fossil fuels? Probably without leaky vaccines. Then what?Do you then wonder why some 3% of scientists are climate change deniers? The ones on fossil fuel payrolls (although they know the truth).
Why is Gupta a sleazeball? Pretty smart guy and practicing surgeon. What position has he taken that has rubbed you the wrong way? Would you not let him work on your brain?Another sleazeball.
The only free people are those who lie and cheat and play, "pay to play" with our lives. Very people are free. I dont think we ever had true freedom as individuals. Example, I hated school but was forced to go. I had no choice.What lies? Again, interesting take if you've never listened? I'm assuming you are taking exception with the Dr. Malone interview. Just curious as to what you think the lies are?
But, it's free country (for the most part) and you don't have to listen. At least spotify gets the censorship piece right.
Joe Rogan’s podcast was never intended to be an accurate source of information – it was always a place for people to sit around, get intoxicated, and have an interesting conversation.What lies? Again, interesting take if you've never listened? I'm assuming you are taking exception with the Dr. Malone interview. Just curious as to what you think the lies are?
But, it's free country (for the most part) and you don't have to listen. At least spotify gets the censorship piece right.
Are you confusing Gupta with Oz?Another sleazeball.
Here, catch up and get back to me:Where did you get this 3% from? All scientists? Climate peeps? Who are these scientists? Of course a "scientist" that works for Exxon, etc would lean pro-fossil fuel. Besides, where would we be with the leaky vaccines if it wasn't for fossil fuels? Probably without leaky vaccines. Then what?
Joe Rogan’s podcast was never intended to be an accurate source of information – it was always a place for people to sit around, get intoxicated, and have an interesting conversation.
The format of the Joe Rogan Experience hasn’t really changed over the years, but the obscene amount of attention the podcast attracts has changed the context of those conversations; when millions of people are listening, it’s inevitable that some are going to take Rogan’s opinions, or that of his guests, very seriously indeed.
Rogan himself seems to swing between different political positions, depending on who he is speaking to, and is known for randomly repeating debunked conspiracy theories and making strange observations, often while incredibly stoned.
![]()
Joe Rogan Apologizes For Spreading Misinformation
With a large platform, comes great responsibility.www.forbes.com
So your jealous he gets paid for it?He makes a living stirring up idiots with lies.