I wouldn't go that far. He certainly has some hypochondriac issues.Coocoo.
Opinion piece disguised as a news article.Health experts are quitting the NIH, CDC in droves
The NIH and CDC are reportedly facing staffing shortages as low morale drives away employees. Decisions like the closure of schools and then requiring face masks.www.dailymail.co.uk
People have had it, but a large fraction of those infections were Delta or earlier.The vast majority of those people holding out have already had it. It wasn’t approved as a booster so it’s also not helpful there. Perhaps someday we’ll get the whole story why they slow walked this one.
Hey we agree on something…look at thatPeople have had it, but a large fraction of those infections were Delta or earlier.
That early natural immunity may well have the same problem v/s BA.5. Seems likely that early natural immunity would also be attacking the wrong shape spike protein.
So, they've had "it", in the same sense that I've had the flu. I had the old flu, but I could still get the new flu version next week. (Though maybe not as bad.)
It's being coined, "The month to month virus." Basically, if you took all the jabs, this one mutates on a monthly bases. Yikes!Hey we agree on something…look at that
just like if I want to avoid the flu, particularly if I’ve already had the flu say last year, I don’t go around trying to get the flu shot from last years flu strain, which I’ve already had. That’s why they make updated ones every year. Unfortunately, though, this virus mutates so fast ba.5 and the new strain out of india may have even mutated out of the original omicron which the booster shot is to be based on.
too bad. At least it makes the mandate fights less bad when the boosters are ready.
I wonder whether the virus mutates fast, or we simply have an enormous number of copies in circulation.Hey we agree on something…look at that
just like if I want to avoid the flu, particularly if I’ve already had the flu say last year, I don’t go around trying to get the flu shot from last years flu strain, which I’ve already had. That’s why they make updated ones every year. Unfortunately, though, this virus mutates so fast ba.5 and the new strain out of india may have even mutated out of the original omicron which the booster shot is to be based on.
too bad. At least it makes the mandate fights less bad when the boosters are ready.
False and dangerous advice sir.In any case, any new booster will be an improvement.
It's opinion just like the CDC and Fauci guidance. No difference, don't be fooled by the initials or the academic titles. Is it influenced by pharma? I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but with the CDC's and FDA's recommendation of 0-4 vaccinations I'm beginning to wonder. I personally think that guidance is malpractice.Opinion piece disguised as a news article.
I got as far as "Fauci flip-flopped again.".
Some of the opinions I agree with, but the facts in that article are few and far between.
Yet! I love you watty and you are close. They call me dumb dumb for a reason. They call me loser, medication taker, Coo Coo, Fool, stupid, moron, whacho bird and so many others kind words. I take it all in and wear at on my heart as a badge of honor. Your dealing with people who have been bought at best and blackmailed at worse.I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but with the CDC's and FDA's recommendation of 0-4 vaccinations I'm beginning to wonder.
Just FYI, in the first month of 0-4 vaccine availability only 1.5% of this population has been vaccinated. We're still only at 30% for 5-11 vaccinations. The public seems to understand the cost benefit far better than our government health agencies do.It's opinion just like the CDC and Fauci guidance. No difference, don't be fooled by the initials or the academic titles. Is it influenced by pharma? I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but with the CDC's and FDA's recommendation of 0-4 vaccinations I'm beginning to wonder. I personally think that guidance is malpractice.
Unfortunately the sources for the article have to be anonymous because they will be ostracized by the scientific community. That community doesn't take kindly to any differentiation from so-called consensus.