"Keep this low key" bro. I needs a favor and your the go to son I'm told ((son with a Papi in high places)) lol!!! The old game is coming to an end and new game is starting for those with a good heart. Not a perfect human, just one that is HOT and willing to create a new way with the Creator.
Vaccine
- Thread starter Multi Sport
- Start date
thirteenknots
SILVER ELITE
A. You do not understand what a woman is. ( Fact ! )
B. You have lost your way.
Biology 101:
Man = XY The sperm carrier.
Woman = XX The ovum carrier.
This process only works ONE way.
You cannot cosmetically construct and duplicate what
God created.
That's so close! that it's not worth trying to correct you.
Consider this -- the X chromosome part is female. All humans have an X chromosome.
That is also not entirely correct, but it's closer than your opinion.
And what about XYY, XXX, and XXY people? Man or woman?
Last edited:
MicPaPa
GOLD
Wow, edgy and brave! Now get out from behind your keyboard, don your skinny jeans and rainbow tee, and go to your local mosque and do a fake invisible Allah bit.
GoldenGate
GOLD
So now the Bible is the sports rulebook? I thought it was the dictionary?
GoldenGate
GOLD
Gays, trans and brown people are all coming for your children.
It’s not really that blurry. All three of those conditions are pretty rare. On the order of 0.1% of people.
It’s irrelevant anyway. None of the athletes in question have one of those conditions.
what-happened
GOLD
Let me help you, they are disorders but are still: man, woman, man.
XYY - can get XX pregnant
XXX - can get pregnant by XY and XXY, a bit hard by XXY
XXY - usually infertile, can get XX pregnant with treatment.
13K is the one you should be addressing. He's the one with the absolutist statements.
Are you proposing that "can get pregnant" is a proper definition of woman?
EvilGoalie 21
GOLD
I knew if this stuff about X's and Y's stewed long enough we'd come to a point of realization that defining any biological trait by genotype alone is never sufficient. Ultimately, there has to be some kind of phenotypic expression. That's what a trait is.
So, yes, all the guys posting here should try this out tonight. Hi Honey I'm home. Guess what I learned today? What makes you a woman is not that you are XX (with one of them being inactivated in each cell at that). It's that I can get you preggers. It's just Truth, Fact and Biology.
She may well have a different take on Truth, Fact and Biology. Her Truth and Facts may involve you having to tell the dog to slide it over on the couch that night, and getting a crash course in the Biology of pain and swelling.
met61
GOLD
...Truth is clear and simple...women cannot be men and men cannot be women.
...anything short of Truth, requires the song and dance you just performed above.
met61
GOLD
... actually, it is relevant to the left...they only need a kernel to fuel their agenda and construct their lies upon.
EvilGoalie 21
GOLD
Heh heh. What about Immaculate Conception, then? Is that Song and Dance or Chapter and Verse? I imagine Truth comes with a convenient dichotomous cleavage point.
A difficult question for serious Jesuit scientists is the sex-chromosome genotype of Jesus. Since her only biological parent was her mother, one must assume it was XX since there was no one to contribute a Y. That makes her a woman, right?
Unless, of course, Mary was one of those rare trisomy individuals.
Lot of words, but it erodes your own point.
If you're going with phenotypic expression, then you have to group people by birth gender. Those are the genes which were expressed.
Surgery doesn't count. Otherwise, you have to believe in unicorns whenever someone cuts one horn off of a goat.
Even phenotypes can be ambiguous. There have been a few cases recorded where the newborn was genotypically male (XY) but due to a congenital malformation there were none of the expected male organs visible. Parents had to decide whether to raise the child as a male with no external genitals, or allow surgery to convert the child to a sterile female, with appropriate hormone treatment during the time that puberty was expected.
EvilGoalie 21
GOLD
Right, if one wants to approach the issue from genetics, the genotype of Mary becomes a question. And the karyotype of Jesus-the only haploid human thing. But, even for the Jesuits, I think the real question is whether genetics is the right pond to be fishing for answers. After all, I think it is only doctrine, not the Biblical text per se, taking a hard line where devine conception and biological conception mean the same thing. The reference in Luke to Mary's relative Elizabeth conceiving a child in old age is also sort of interesting.