Vaccine

By the way for espola and how the press carries water for a certain side.

Read through it. This story was proven false almost immediately and yet look how it spread like wildfire.


Carry water? I posted links to two non-partisan analyses of media bias. Didn't you read them? Or look at the pictures?

I'm guessing not, since you followed with criticism that they must be biased because they never post stories that make you feel good about your personal political positions.
 
Carry water? I posted links to two non-partisan analyses of media bias. Didn't you read them? Or look at the pictures?

I'm guessing not, since you followed with criticism that they must be biased because they never post stories that make you feel good about your personal political positions.

Here's another version --

1642752274163.png
 
Ugh. Well, again, it's the bed the media made. I found this one further down the string. Wow.

The hard lefty's are snitches, tattle talers, gossipers, liars, cheaters and back stabbers and will save themselves first. My good friends from the left side have been honest, eyes wide open and high five me. The bad cheaters on left, their losing their shits and it's all over their faces. TGIF bro. love you man :)
 
Here's another version --

View attachment 12731
I like the app - Ground News. You can click an article and it will categorize the org covering - it will also allow you to click to others and categorize them. It will also group the L/C/R and give % coverage, e.g. an article is getting coverage L/C/R 40%/40%/20% for example.

Basically you can read the same news from any or all of 3 different perspectives. You can also see how one side is all over some items vs the other.

Ground News

From their front page

1642774355299.png
 
I like the app - Ground News. You can click an article and it will categorize the org covering - it will also allow you to click to others and categorize them. It will also group the L/C/R and give % coverage, e.g. an article is getting coverage L/C/R 40%/40%/20% for example.

Basically you can read the same news from any or all of 3 different perspectives. You can also see how one side is all over some items vs the other.

Ground News

From their front page

View attachment 12732
Ideology over facts? I prefer a site that fact-checks, I can discern the slant pretty easily.
 
Who fact checks the fact checkers? If it's on the internet, it has a slant. To your point, discerning the slant is your own responsibility.

The funny thing is it looks like in the chart they struggled to find a true centrist. The BCC is not centrist. NPR and WSJ had to be broken up into news and opinion to fit there. RCP as a publisher is not centrist....only as an aggregator....it leans right. It's a stretch to call Newsweek centrist because they publish a few conservatives from time to time. But they no doubt found the centrist category lacking and wanted to put in as much in it as possible.
 
The funny thing is it looks like in the chart they struggled to find a true centrist. The BCC is not centrist. NPR and WSJ had to be broken up into news and opinion to fit there. RCP as a publisher is not centrist....only as an aggregator....it leans right. It's a stretch to call Newsweek centrist because they publish a few conservatives from time to time. But they no doubt found the centrist category lacking and wanted to put in as much in it as possible.

No doubt?
 
What does the Internet have to do with it? How are these publications behaving any differently than they did pre-Internet? Yellow journalism has existed before any of us were alive.
I don't really understand your point. I was talking about claims of fact checking and the fallacy of it. For example, who is fact checking facebook fact checkers. Facebook has admitted their fact checkers have used biased opinion as the basis for the fact checking.....funny huh. Factcheckers who aren't steeped in facts. Self licking ice cream cone.

Happens all the time, especially when people cherry pick data to make a point, intionally leaving out data that provides helpful context to allow someone to make a decision. Activists doctors are doing this all the time these days. You posted an analsysis from a Dr that didn't provide 100% of information needed to come to an unbiased conclusion. He has an agenda - well intentioned or not. The M&Ms on the Rogan show did the same thing. Funny how that happens..
 
I like the app - Ground News. You can click an article and it will categorize the org covering - it will also allow you to click to others and categorize them. It will also group the L/C/R and give % coverage, e.g. an article is getting coverage L/C/R 40%/40%/20% for example.

Basically you can read the same news from any or all of 3 different perspectives. You can also see how one side is all over some items vs the other.

Ground News

From their front page

View attachment 12732

How do they determine their ratings?
 
Carry water? I posted links to two non-partisan analyses of media bias. Didn't you read them? Or look at the pictures?

I'm guessing not, since you followed with criticism that they must be biased because they never post stories that make you feel good about your personal political positions.

Slither....
Slither....

You are a filthy snake.
 
Slither....
Slither....

You are a filthy snake.
This Espola is interesting Soul. My dd went through some soccer Doc shit and I got ripped for even asking a few questions about how a Doc should behave around young females learning to be the best of the best at 13 years old. The day of reckoning is fast approaching. Protect the children first and all will go well for you and your family. Allow children to be abused and you got Karma and a custom Millstone coming for your neck. Most fair minded men want to protect the kids. Game on!!! Now you know why they hate t so much. Dude comes out swinging with this epic blast, "My administrations #1 focus is to eradicate human trafficking and sex trafficking and organ trafficking. Watch this again.... 0:06 he starts with his war of words with all the losers who used kids for all sorts of evil. Look at CNN producers and all the others out there. Help protect the kids!!!

 
Back
Top