Desert Hound
DA
This is your Dem party Espola and Husker. They do not want to turn these people over to the Feds. They feel righteous doing this.
To be honest before we got here they were killing other tribes. They have a long history of brutally subjugating or slaughtering other tribes.
It wasn't any peace festival here before the Euros arrived.
And this has been the history of man throughout history at any place around the world. No matter where you go in the world you are sitting on land that was conquered from another group. So the stolen land thing is such a stupid thing libs in the US and Canada do.
I think some souls came to earth to show other souls not to cheat to win and help tje new earth with love & truth. Lots of play time, but fair and honest. Lastly bro, I'm not sure everything these liars teach us and show us through the Tel A Vision is true, like the Truman show.Dude, the Comanches were ruthless warriors. They were a marginalized subsistence tribe in undesirable land in the area that is now Wyoming until the Spaniards left a bunch of horses they domesticated and used for raiding. They raided other tribes for years and expanded their dominance before fighting against US settlers. In a relatively short time, they conquered and ruled the southern Great Plains where the Bison were plentiful. They scalped, raped, mutilated, and tortured enemies. There was no quarter. Several other tribes were no more “moral”, they just couldn’t compete with the Comanches mastery of the horse - specifically, its use in battle. War and its spoils were the core of status in the tribe.
Now that doesn’t mean the US settlers were any more “moral”. All were humans capable of unspeakable atrocities. We still are. Our culture dictates the type of adult we raise.
That's so completely unprofessional to air your dirty employment laundry in public like that. Just goes to show his lack of character. These journalists act like spoiled children that are told no for the first time.Thus just in --
Statement of Scott Pelley
I'm saddened to see the transcript of the CBS News morning editorial meeting.
Bari Weiss knows what she said is not true. In the meeting on Tuesday, in which I was effectively fired, there was no effort of any kind to "find a way back," as Weiss said in the editorial meeting. At no point did anyone in the Tuesday meeting suggest that there could be steps taken by either side that would lead to a resolution. Weiss and Tom Cibrowski were openly hostile from the start. "Firing" was raised by Cibrowski in the first 15 seconds. No CBS executive, at any time, suggested "a way back." To say so now is disingenuous. And they know it.
In fact, Weiss, Cibrowski and Nick Bilton refused to answer my questions. I asked Weiss a number of questions about why she fired the entire senior staff of 60 Minutes a few days before and without cause.
"I'm not answering that question," she said.
I asked why she did not come to 60 Minutes' offices to explain her actions.
"I'm not answering that question."
Why did she fire 60 Minutes Executive Producer Tanya Simon?
"I'm not answering that question."
Why fire correspondent Cecilia Vega?
"I'm not answering that question."
Why fire correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi?
"I'm not answering that question."
Throughout the meeting, the CBS executives were abrupt, dismissive and uninterested in dialogue.
Suddenly, and to my surprise, Cibrowski declared, "This conversation is over!"
"Why?" I asked. "I'm happy to answer your questions."
"This conversation is over!" Cibrowski repeated, raising his voice and standing to show me the door.
"I'm happy to keep talking," I added.
No constructive dialogue was allowed by the CBS executives at any point. I was stonewalled for about 10 minutes and then, for no apparent reason, "This conversation is over."
I am pained that the staff of CBS News was misled in the Wednesday morning conference call. These executives cannot gain the trust of the staff with lies. This is antithetical to everything we stand for and reveals contempt for what journalists do.
That looks like a "Yes" answer to the first question.You either are dumb or pretend to be dumb all the time. I think it is a combo of both.
Non profits run by people from one political viewpoint are not non partisan.
The impending demise of 60 Minutes is of compelling interest to all Americans (and to the rest of the world, for that matter). Dismissing it as "dirty employment laundry" shows your bias.That's so completely unprofessional to air your dirty employment laundry in public like that. Just goes to show his lack of character. These journalists act like spoiled children that are told no for the first time.
I have been posting such things since you returned. Haven't you noticed?Considering I just started posting again a couple days ago, no.
Completely honest, your response to my post didnt address the issue. So again, no.I have been posting such things since you returned. Haven't you noticed?




60 Minutes lost all credibility when Dan Rather presented a completely fabricated story on George Bush. That was the beginning of the demise of independent journalism.The impending demise of 60 Minutes is of compelling interest to all Americans (and to the rest of the world, for that matter). Dismissing it as "dirty employment laundry" shows your bias.