Today in Fascism

How bad is it going to be when tRump wins? I mean, your wallet will be thrilled, but are you looking forward to crying about it for 4 more years?
Do you agree with the House majority that true statements about important current events should not be allowed to be spoken on the House floor by House members?
 
All you have is lies and insults. My response is appropriate.
I didn't insult you until you coward out. Your response is weak because you can't defend your position.

All I have? I provided facts. You provided "q.e.d." and it's as pathetic as "tRump". Clown.
 
I didn't insult you until you coward out. Your response is weak because you can't defend your position.

All I have? I provided facts. You provided "q.e.d." and it's as pathetic as "tRump". Clown.
Then what is this?

If Kaepernick is some kind of hero to you, you've got some really screwed up morals or you're beyond ignorant.
 
Do you agree with the House majority that true statements about important current events should not be allowed to be spoken on the House floor by House members?
I think as a nation, in 2024, we have a problem with "true" and "facts" and "fact checking". Opinions aren't facts. Blame whomever you want for that.
 
Then what is this?

If Kaepernick is some kind of hero to you, you've got some really screwed up morals or you're beyond ignorant.
It's a fact. I'm happy to explain in further detail if you need it.

Heroes don't wear "cops are pigs" socks. Not my heroes. Is that your idea of a hero?
 
I think as a nation, in 2024, we have a problem with "true" and "facts" and "fact checking". Opinions aren't facts. Blame whomever you want for that.
McGovern's stricken comments --

We have a presumptive nominee for president facing 88 felony counts, and we're being prevented from even acknowledging it. These are not alternative facts. These are real facts.

A candidate for president of the United States is on trial for sending ahush money payment to a porn star to avoid a sex scandal during his 2016 campaign, and then fraudulently disguising those payments in violation of the law. He's also charged with conspiring to overturn the election. He's also charged with stealing classified information, and a jury has already found him liable for rape in a civil court.

And yet, in this Republican-controlled House, it's okay to talk about the trial, but you have to call it a "sham." It's okay to say that the jury is rigged, but not that Trump should be held accountable. It's okay to say the court is corrupt, but not that Trump is corrupting the rule of law.

What about that is not factual?
 
Can you quote any statement of mine that says I think he is a hero?
You're the one that challenged my comment. Why do you have a problem with it? I posted facts. You post deflections. Kaepernick was nothing but an opportunist and it backfired in his face.
 
You're the one that challenged my comment. Why do you have a problem with it? I posted facts. You post deflections. Kaepernick was nothing but an opportunist and it backfired in his face.
I couldn't help but notice that your search for such a quote failed.
 
Not following the thread?
I'll ask you again. Why is the house of representatives talking about Trump? I know why they're doing it. It's their last, most pathetic gasp at continuing to try to paint Trump as a threat because they know Biden can't win. Are YOU willing to admit it?

No, you aren't. So again, I ask you, why is the house wasting our tax dollars talking about Trump when he currently holds no position in politics?
 
I'll ask you again. Why is the house of representatives talking about Trump? I know why they're doing it. It's their last, most pathetic gasp at continuing to try to paint Trump as a threat because they know Biden can't win. Are YOU willing to admit it?

No, you aren't. So again, I ask you, why is the house wasting our tax dollars talking about Trump when he currently holds no position in politics?
"No position in politics" is an interesting analysis.
 
Back
Top