The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

1. Do you have to be from Kenya to be Kenyan?
2. Why does the left (you) bring race into every conversation?
You know Obama is more white than black, right?
Obama is white when he needs to be and black when he wants to be and dumb all the time.
3. You think the media isn’t left leaning?

1573427588930.png
 
1. Do you have to be from Kenya to be Kenyan?
2. Why does the left (you) bring race into every conversation?
You know Obama is more white than black, right?
Obama is white when he needs to be and black when he wants to be and dumb all the time.
3. You think the media isn’t left leaning?
1) Yes.
2) I'm not the one referring to a black man born in Hawaii as "Kenyan". I can guarantee you if one of Obama's parents were from Ireland, for example, you would not be referring to Obama as "the Irishman".
3) I'm assuming this statement was meant to provoke some sort of emotional response. Instead, you just embarrassed yourself, and the sad thing is you probably don't even realize it.
 
The "aryan nation", "alt-right", "white nationalist", "neo-Nazi" playbook is what lil' joe plays by, and when someone recognizes and exposes his racism the playbook tells him to accuse those people of being the real racists. His game is tired and obvious.
 
The "aryan nation", "alt-right", "white nationalist", "neo-Nazi" playbook is what lil' joe plays by, and when someone recognizes and exposes his racism the playbook tells him to accuse those people of being the real racists. His game is tired and obvious.
It's quite sad, to be honest. There is a fascinating documentary called "The Brainwashing of my Dad" about a man who changed from a moderate Democrat to a right-wing fanatic due to listening to conservative talk radio and Fox News. What was so alarming to the daughter who directed the film is that her dad went from being a reasonably happy, non-political type of a man to an angry and isolated person. I have a good friend who had the same sort of metamorphosis. He was known for being one of those "cup is half full" type of people. Always happy, always finding the humor in a situation. He was a joy to be around and you always left him feeling a bit better. Then he married a woman who watched Fox News constantly. He gradually changed and it was so sad to see. He became paranoid, bitter, and constantly angry. It was shocking, actually. He lost a lot of his friends because he would get in arguments all the time, couldn't talk about anything but politics. He would just park himself in front of Fox News and he literally became a shell of himself. His health went downhill as well. It was truly frightening to see how much he changed simply by listening to only one point of view.
 
It's quite sad, to be honest. There is a fascinating documentary called "The Brainwashing of my Dad" about a man who changed from a moderate Democrat to a right-wing fanatic due to listening to conservative talk radio and Fox News. What was so alarming to the daughter who directed the film is that her dad went from being a reasonably happy, non-political type of a man to an angry and isolated person. I have a good friend who had the same sort of metamorphosis. He was known for being one of those "cup is half full" type of people. Always happy, always finding the humor in a situation. He was a joy to be around and you always left him feeling a bit better. Then he married a woman who watched Fox News constantly. He gradually changed and it was so sad to see. He became paranoid, bitter, and constantly angry. It was shocking, actually. He lost a lot of his friends because he would get in arguments all the time, couldn't talk about anything but politics. He would just park himself in front of Fox News and he literally became a shell of himself. His health went downhill as well. It was truly frightening to see how much he changed simply by listening to only one point of view.
Sad indeed, and they are convinced it's not them it's everyone else . . . and as I say, "If it (problems) keeps happening with different people it might be them (that is causing the problems)".
 
1) Yes.
2) I'm not the one referring to a black man born in Hawaii as "Kenyan". I can guarantee you if one of Obama's parents were from Ireland, for example, you would not be referring to Obama as "the Irishman".
3) I'm assuming this statement was meant to provoke some sort of emotional response. Instead, you just embarrassed yourself, and the sad thing is you probably don't even realize it.
It’s ok if you can’t answer the questions, these other libs can’t answer my questions as well.
As soon as you bring race into the argument you have lost.
You will fit in with all the other sore losers in here from the left.
Trump 2020.
 
It’s ok if you can’t answer the questions, these other libs can’t answer my questions as well.
As soon as you bring race into the argument you have lost.
You will fit in with all the other sore losers in here from the left.
Trump 2020.
I didn't answer the question? Or you didn't like my answers. And, again, you are the one who brought race into the question by a) referring to Barack Obama as Kenyan; b) stating the Barack Obama is white when he needs to be a black "when he wants to be dumb all the time". If that isn't racist then I don't know what is.

Let's try something here and see which is a legitimate question:

1) So what do you think about White Supremacy Pedophile Racist Trump getting pee'd on by Russia Whores???

or..

2) So what do you think about Trump's making fun of a disabled reporter, or bragging about grabbing women by the p*ssy?

Do you see the difference? The first question is filled with insults, conspiracy theories, and supposition...it's not a question that can be answered. The second question is regarding two events that actually happened and I don't degrade Trump by calling him names either. Which do you think is an answerable question?

I think you ask questions the way you do because you don't want to hear an answer. You have made up your mind so any intelligent discussion is pointless as you can't bear dissent.

You can call us "libs", "sore losers", etc. all you want if it makes you feel better. All I know is I'm not the one calling others "c*nt" or "whore" or making ignorant and disgusting negative statements about certain races as a whole. No one who is truly content with their life uses such vile language, they don't need to.
 
It’s ok if you can’t answer the questions, these other libs can’t answer my questions as well.
As soon as you bring race into the argument you have lost.
You will fit in with all the other sore losers in here from the left.
Trump 2020.
I do see one question you asked which I didn't answer. Not on purpose, I was in a rush and missed it. You asked me if I thought the media is left-leaning. I think some media are clearly left-leaning, like MSNBC, and some are clearly right-leaning, such as FOX News. I think CNN, ABC, and NBC try to be as objective as possible.

For me, personally, I don't like news being "spun" whether it be left-leaning or right-leaning, so I always try to find as many sources as I can to reach a consensus on what is the truth. One thing I don't do is call any news I don't like "fake news". I don't want to live in an echo chamber.

And, for what it's worth, I have voted for both Republican and Democratic candidates. I never thought George W. Bush was a horrible President, for example. My personal take is he didn't have a lot of confidence in himself as President so he deferred to Cheney and Rumsfeld too much. I appreciated his speech after 9/11. He brought the Nation together in a time we really needed it. I can't see Trump doing that, not even close. I think George H. W. Bush was a decent President and an honorable man. I think Bill Clinton had problems keeping his pants zipped but I also think he was good President. Good for our economy and good for many important social issues.

I would not have voted from Trump under any circumstances, which includes him running as a Democrat.
 
I didn't answer the question? Or you didn't like my answers. And, again, you are the one who brought race into the question by a) referring to Barack Obama as Kenyan; b) stating the Barack Obama is white when he needs to be a black "when he wants to be dumb all the time". If that isn't racist then I don't know what is.

Let's try something here and see which is a legitimate question:

1) So what do you think about White Supremacy Pedophile Racist Trump getting pee'd on by Russia Whores???

or..

2) So what do you think about Trump's making fun of a disabled reporter, or bragging about grabbing women by the p*ssy?

Do you see the difference? The first question is filled with insults, conspiracy theories, and supposition...it's not a question that can be answered. The second question is regarding two events that actually happened and I don't degrade Trump by calling him names either. Which do you think is an answerable question?

I think you ask questions the way you do because you don't want to hear an answer. You have made up your mind so any intelligent discussion is pointless as you can't bear dissent.

You can call us "libs", "sore losers", etc. all you want if it makes you feel better. All I know is I'm not the one calling others "c*nt" or "whore" or making ignorant and disgusting negative statements about certain races as a whole. No one who is truly content with their life uses such vile language, they don't need to.
 
Does anyone know what ever happened to the child molester Roy Moore?
How about all the women Kavanaugh tormented?
Are all those little illegal aliens still in cages?
 


1. Adam Schiff lights a building on fire.

2. Adam Schiff tells (EricCiaramella) to tell a " Policeman " a building is on fire.

3. " Policeman " calls in a fire.

4. " Fire Chief " calls " Policeman " and inquires who (Eric Ciaramella) is.

5. Adam Schiff threatens " Fire Chief " with lawsuit if he pursues the TRUTH.

6. Adam Schiff lights another building on fire.
 
I'm a giver. This is a much better image of her -

View attachment 5611


Once again " Spola " the Forum perv is posting his 24 hour day - a threefer......
10 seconds of jealousy.....
10 seconds of envy......
10 seconds of fantasy.....
He's done....
Now he has.........
23 hours 59 minutes and 30 seconds of frustration, misery and hate......

Where as Trump has 24 hours of Beauty in person......Poor Poor Spola...

https://media.istockphoto.com/photos/masculine-hand-grips-drooping-rope-implications-of-impotence-black-picture-id681732728?k=6&m=681732728&s=612x612&w=0&h=f1YwApZr7kvNAyXgX5A3la7UWjvWbwxEIjJOWQgyBos=
 
I didn't answer the question? Or you didn't like my answers. And, again, you are the one who brought race into the question by a) referring to Barack Obama as Kenyan; b) stating the Barack Obama is white when he needs to be a black "when he wants to be dumb all the time". If that isn't racist then I don't know what is.

Let's try something here and see which is a legitimate question:

1) So what do you think about White Supremacy Pedophile Racist Trump getting pee'd on by Russia Whores???


or..

2) So what do you think about Trump's making fun of a disabled reporter, or bragging about grabbing women by the p*ssy?

Do you see the difference? The first question is filled with insults, conspiracy theories, and supposition...it's not a question that can be answered. The second question is regarding two events that actually happened and I don't degrade Trump by calling him names either. Which do you think is an answerable question?

I think you ask questions the way you do because you don't want to hear an answer. You have made up your mind so any intelligent discussion is pointless as you can't bear dissent.

You can call us "libs", "sore losers", etc. all you want if it makes you feel better. All I know is I'm not the one calling others "c*nt" or "whore" or making ignorant and disgusting negative statements about certain races as a whole. No one who is truly content with their life uses such vile language, they don't need to.

The media, the intelligence community and most experts have treated the dossier with ca
ution due to its unverified allegations,
The left has been trying to undue the 2016 presidential election since it was lost by Hillary.
The left should allow the people who to choose the next President a year from now. The impeachment dream is a loser and the Democrats
mat very well get Trump re=elected.
 
The media, the intelligence community and most experts have treated the dossier with caution due to its unverified allegations,
The left has been trying to undue the 2016 presidential election since it was lost by Hillary.
The left should allow the people who to choose the next President a year from now. The impeachment dream is a loser and the Democrats
mat very well get Trump re=elected.

trumpist
 
Curtis Ellis: Trump and the Paris Climate Accord–Another Promise Kept
Environmentalist activists form a human chain representing the peace sign and the spelling out 100% renewable, on the side line of the COP21, United Nations Climate Change Conference near the Eiffel Tower in Paris, Sunday, Dec. 6, 2015. Negotiators adopted a draft climate agreement Saturday that was cluttered with brackets …
AP Photo/Michel EulerCURTIS ELLIS11 Nov 201939
4:20
On November 4, 2019, President Trump made good on yet another promise to the American people.
That was the day the Trump administration formally notified the U.N. that the United States will withdraw from the Paris Climate Accords.

This fulfills the promise Donald J. Trump made on the campaign trail and renewed soon after taking office when he declared his intent to pull out of the globalist compact.

In doing so, President Trump has upheld his commitment to put the interests of the American people and America first.
President Trump has rejected the alarmism, globalist groupthink and questionable premises the climate change activists have used to justify unnecessary costs, taxes and regulations that would cripple our economic growth and prosperity.
The U.N. agreement has numerous infirmities, not the least of which is the massive drain it would impose on the U.S. economy.

The Paris accord would force the United States to cut its carbon emissions – which means energy use and industry – by almost a third from 2005 levels. Meanwhile, China – already the greatest polluter on earth – would be allowed to actually increase the amount of greenhouse gases it dumps into the atmosphere.
The Paris Agreement is projected to kill as many as 2.7 million jobs within the United States by 2025, according to the National Economic Research Associates.
It would crush America’s coal, energy and manufacturing industries with austerity measures imposed by unaccountable opaque international bureaucracies.
The Heritage Foundation says this part of the “climate” agreement alone amounts to a $2.5 trillion tax on the American people—an estimated $30,000 per family.
But there’s more. American taxpayers would also foot the bill for a multi-billion dollar “green energy fund” that would be redistributed to most of the other 170 nations in the agreement, including dictatorships and some of the most corrupt countries on Earth.

If that were not reason enough to run away, the overall effect of the agreement would be practically nonexistent.
According to Dr. Bjorn Lomborg, an economist who studied the accord, even if every nation fulfilled each of its commitments in the compacts (which no one expects) global temperature reduction would be only five hundredths of a degree – 0.05°C – by 2100.
In critiquing the Paris deal, CNBC senior columnist Jack Novak wrote, “big-government and centrally-planned schemes like the Paris deal are the problem,” rather than the solution to the current environmental challenges.
Clearly, the accords were designed for virtue signaling by the globalist elites and financiers who make up the “green” special interest lobby rather than for actually improving the environment. President Trump pointed this out in 2017 when he labeled the CEOs who left an administration advisory council to protest his Paris Accord announcement as “grandstanders.”
Billionaires like Michael Bloomberg – who is the United Nations Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Climate Action – pay homage to the environment for the cameras, but their primary concern is making money.
 
Another dead towel head, goats will be able to sleep a little better tonight.
Israel kills powerful Islamic Jihad commander al-Ata in targeted strike
IDF kills Baha Abu al-Ata, says he was planning ‘imminent’ attacks; rocket sirens sound in south as schools closed and army prepares for fresh round of fighting
By TOI STAFFToday, 5:12 am 6
Palestinians inspect the damaged house of Islamic Jihad leader Baha Abu Al-Ata  after an Israeli attack in Gaza city, on November 12, 2019.(Photo by MAHMUD HAMS / AFP)
Palestinians inspect the damaged house of Islamic Jihad leader Baha Abu Al-Ata after an Israeli attack in Gaza city, on November 12, 2019.(Photo by MAHMUD HAMS / AFP)
The Israel Defense Forces killed a senior commander of the Islamic Jihad terror group responsible for the firing dozens of rockets out of the Gaza Strip, authorities said early Tuesday, in an attack that could send the sides sliding back toward war.
Shortly after the attack, rocket sirens sounded throughout southern Israel, as the region girded for a fresh round of violence. There was no immediate word on injuries or damage.
 
Back
Top