The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Seems that keeping in line with his fellow nutters t is an expert on windmills. He displays the same in depth knowledge of windmills and wind generated power that dizzy does on finance, as the plumber does on global climate, as nono does concerning conspiracy theories large and small, as LE does on general knowledge and lil' ho does on everything he brings up.
 

upload_2019-4-7_16-4-41.gif
Trump The Madman Somehow Tricked A Bunch Of Democrats Into Defending MS-13 Thugs (Again)
Timothy Meads | @Timothy__Meads | April 07, 2019


world. In their earnest desire to ruin the current president of the United States with lies and slander, liberals, Democratic representatives, and presidential hopefuls have begun defending the virtuosity of violent gang members who stab their victims more than 100 times and set their bodies on fire. Why? For some reason, the left side of the aisle believes this gives them a moral high ground on President Donald J. Trump.



I wrote about this already but limited the examples in my article to Joy Reid at MSNBC and a New York Times columnist. I should have waited because now President Trump has unwittingly tricked boatloads of Democrats into defending MS-13 gang members. The astounding thing is that he wasn't even trying to do so.

After hearing a quote of President Trump supposedly calling asylum seekers "animals" that was tweeted on Friday night by Mark Elliot, somebody who is for all intent and purposes a Twitter rando, Democrats simply had to rush out and condemn the president.

The great irony here is that this all stemmed from a clip that was already debunked last year after the first time a media brouhaha occurred because of this deceptively edited video. Here's what I wrote yesterday about Elliot's clip:

Indeed, if Elliot had simply started the video just seconds earlier, his audience would know the president was absolutely referring to MS-13 gang members and not asylum seekers.

Sheriff Margaret Mimms of Fresno County, CA, lamented the fact that Immigration and Customs Enforcement does not have access to her database of "bad guys" because of Sanctuary City laws prevent them from doing so, she told the roundtable. At the end of her speaking slot, she remarked, "There could be an MS-13 member I know about — if they don’t reach a certain threshold, I cannot tell ICE about it."

The president responded by saying:

"We have people coming into the country, or trying to come in — and we’re stopping a lot of them — but we’re taking people out of the country. You wouldn’t believe how bad these people are. These aren’t people. These are animals. And we’re taking them out of the country at a level and at a rate that’s never happened before. And because of the weak laws, they come in fast, we get them, we release them, we get them again, we bring them out. It’s crazy. The dumbest laws — as I said before, the dumbest laws on immigration in the world. So we’re going to take care of it, Margaret. We’ll get it done." emphasis added
 
Seems that keeping in line with his fellow nutters t is an expert on windmills. He displays the same in depth knowledge of windmills and wind generated power that dizzy does on finance, as the plumber does on global climate, as nono does concerning conspiracy theories large and small, as LE does on general knowledge and lil' ho does on everything he brings up.
You get a T for trying.
 
The Wheel Has Turned; Rep. Devin Nunes Will Send Eight Criminal Referrals To The DOJ This Week

Posted at 2:00 pm on April 07, 2019 by Elizabeth Vaughn


ap-devin-nunes-620x399.jpg








Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) spoke to Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo this morning and said he is preparing to send eight criminal referrals to the DOJ this week.

Nunes, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said the referrals concern “alleged misconduct from “Watergate wannabes” during the Trump-Russia investigation, including the leaks of “highly classified material” and conspiracies to lie to Congress and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court.”

Although Nunes did not reveal any names, here are some of the possibilities: James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, Christopher Steele, possibly Rod Rosenstein, James Baker, James Clapper, or John Brennan.





Nunes told Bartiromo:

First of all, all of these are classified or sensitive. … Five of them are what I would call straight up referrals — so just referrals that name someone and name the specific crimes, those crimes are lying to Congress, misleading Congress, leaking classified information. So five of them are those types.

There are three [referrals] that I think are more complicated. … So the first one, is FISA abuse and other matters. We believe there was a conspiracy to lie to the FISA court, mislead the FISA court by numerous individuals that all need to be investigated and looked at, and we believe the [relevant] statute is the conspiracy statute. The second conspiracy one is involving manipulation of intelligence that also could ensnare many Americans.

We’ve had a lot of concerns with the way intelligence was used [during the Trump-Russia probe].

Nunes explained that nine days before the first application to the FISA Court for a warrant to spy on Trump’s foreign policy advisor Carter Page, FBI officials “were battling with a senior Justice Department official who had “continued concerns” about the “possible bias” of a source pivotal to the application.” Hmmm. Someone inside the DOJ had a conscience?

Nunes continued:




He added that one referral could cover more than one individual.

Fox News’ Greg Re believes it’s possible that the current Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff (D-CA) could be named in one of the referrals for leaking the private testimony of Donald Trump Jr. He appeared before the Committee in 2017 to answer questions about the infamous June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Russians who had promised dirt on Hillary Clinton.
 
The Wheel Has Turned; Rep. Devin Nunes Will Send Eight Criminal Referrals To The DOJ This Week

Posted at 2:00 pm on April 07, 2019 by Elizabeth Vaughn


ap-devin-nunes-620x399.jpg








Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) spoke to Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo this morning and said he is preparing to send eight criminal referrals to the DOJ this week.

Nunes, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said the referrals concern “alleged misconduct from “Watergate wannabes” during the Trump-Russia investigation, including the leaks of “highly classified material” and conspiracies to lie to Congress and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court.”

Although Nunes did not reveal any names, here are some of the possibilities: James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, Christopher Steele, possibly Rod Rosenstein, James Baker, James Clapper, or John Brennan.





Nunes told Bartiromo:

First of all, all of these are classified or sensitive. … Five of them are what I would call straight up referrals — so just referrals that name someone and name the specific crimes, those crimes are lying to Congress, misleading Congress, leaking classified information. So five of them are those types.

There are three [referrals] that I think are more complicated. … So the first one, is FISA abuse and other matters. We believe there was a conspiracy to lie to the FISA court, mislead the FISA court by numerous individuals that all need to be investigated and looked at, and we believe the [relevant] statute is the conspiracy statute. The second conspiracy one is involving manipulation of intelligence that also could ensnare many Americans.

We’ve had a lot of concerns with the way intelligence was used [during the Trump-Russia probe].

Nunes explained that nine days before the first application to the FISA Court for a warrant to spy on Trump’s foreign policy advisor Carter Page, FBI officials “were battling with a senior Justice Department official who had “continued concerns” about the “possible bias” of a source pivotal to the application.” Hmmm. Someone inside the DOJ had a conscience?

Nunes continued:




He added that one referral could cover more than one individual.

Fox News’ Greg Re believes it’s possible that the current Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff (D-CA) could be named in one of the referrals for leaking the private testimony of Donald Trump Jr. He appeared before the Committee in 2017 to answer questions about the infamous June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Russians who had promised dirt on Hillary Clinton.
In a related story, Devin Nunes’ Cow has made eight criminal referrals for
The Dairy Council, Farmer John’s, Milk of Magnesia, Jersey Mike’s, Michael Milken, Farmers Insurance, Ben, and Jerry
 
Raw, stinky, progressive B.S. needs a reckoning
By Rick Swenson
Reasonable citizens of our republic are frustrated. They tire of progressive politics invading every simple moment, ruining things that used to be fun, injecting anger and politically correct nonsense where it should not go. Sports, movies, school, award ceremonies, funerals, everywhere one looks, P.C. nonsense attempts to spoil it.

Reasonable citizens are also discovering their once trusted print or televised media has been lying big time. Yes, Trump had something to do with this. He called out the Fake News! But what about academia, social media, Hollywood, tech CEOs and progressive mayors and governors of sanctuary/decaying cities/states? Trump was merely the outlier candidate who dared call the emperor naked. Like it or not, his audacious method won him the presidency.

A snowballing litany of events are pushing citizens too far: Operation Fast and Furious, 'Hands Up Don’t Shoot,' the Smollett race hoax, Lois Lerner’s IRS attacks against Tea Party groups, the Benghazi debacle, Hillary Clinton’s 30,000 insecure emails “disappearing,” Hillary Clinton's exoneration following a kindergarten-style FBI investigation, and certainly most foul, a Deep State bureaucracy attempting to oust a duly elected president. The list goes on.

We who read and watch new media know many more grievous lies and travesties of justice, the list above being just a fraction of them. Thus, some of us grow numb, depressed, and cynical.

We are sad when any of our former circle leave the debate, usually after virtue-signaling some fake event. Lefties are notorious for unfriending when a debate gets close to facts. We can’t resurrect a civil, liberal, healthy politic if they won’t talk with us.

But we need to remember that these former friends and colleagues literally have no clue what has been going on. Their media diet lacks contrary opinion and is sometimes pure fiction. We force ourselves to read the New York Times and the Washington Post and we watch MSNBC occasionally. We can’t avoid CNN if we fly anywhere. But progressives wouldn’t dare watch Fox News or read the American Thinker or other conservative media when we invite them to. Do they ever read Power Line? How illiberal of them.

Ironically, once upon a time Trump was an adored celebrity of the Left (while he shared money and fame with them). You can Google countless photos of him chumming it up with sundry entertainment and media celebs, and other hypocrites. Back then they loved him. Here's a wedding picture.

But now, President Trump is not playing along to get along, as media-favorite politicians do. That’s a huge part of Trump’s appeal. Yet it's totally authentic, and it will win him a second term.

Ask your (remaining) lefty friends to describe a few blessings they enjoy by living in America. You and I might go on for minutes -- we know why the U.S.A. is that Shining City on the Hill. But your Lefty friends probably will not. You should gently ask, why then do so many people from all corners of the world still want to emigrate here?

We know many reasons why progressives hate Trump.

The Paris Castration Accord? Gone. Attempts to nation-build in failed states of the Middle East, squandering precious American lives and capital? Gone. Handing billions of dollars to terrorist state Iran and thereby sponsoring terrorism against the unique democratic state of the region (Israel)? Gone. Preventing free-enterprise capitalists from exploiting energy reserves in our backyard (fracking) or in desolate areas such as ANWAR? Gone. Kow-towing to China or its clients (North Korea) and tolerating unfair trade deals that decimate American industries while globalist bosses (many Republican) skim gravy? Gone. Allowing low-skilled illegals to enter U.S. sanctuary cities, steal taxpayer benefits, disrupt culture, and depress wages of legal citizens? Going. Building a wall that previous administrations and Congresses legislated? Coming --if Trump wants to be re-elected.

How telling of our opportunity when recently when 59 Senators voted no to the goofy Green Deal while every progressive Democrat dared only vote “present,” borrowing a coward’s trick from Obama’s Illinois State Senate days. Here's that Green Deal.
 
It's the law...

(f) Disclosure to Committees of Congress
(1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation


Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.
 
It's the law...

(f) Disclosure to Committees of Congress
(1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation


Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.
Yeah, no.
You can't have it just because you want it.
 
Back
Top