The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Your “ Old “ Union Boss......
dizzy couldn't work hard enough to make it as a rodbuster, he comes off rather soft . . . all you crybaby snowflakes do. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of hard working people who got fooled by t, just not any of you t-swallowers in here. You guys are the small, soft hand types.
 
dizzy couldn't work hard enough to make it as a rodbuster, he comes off rather soft . . . all you crybaby snowflakes do. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of hard working people who got fooled by t, just not any of you t-swallowers in here. You guys are the small, soft hand types.
You are the biggest queerbait in.rodbuster ville.
I am sure you were laughed at, just like we do in here.
 
Supreme Court race ahead of a likely recount
Apr 03, 2019 7:53am PDT by Jeff Singer, Daily Kos Staff
comment_large-8adbba5c278ed0dbc656081bd1f2827c.png
7853
With 100 percent of precincts in, conservative Brian Hagedorn holds a 50.25-49.75 lead over liberal Lisa Neubauer in Tuesday’s officially nonpartisan race for the Wisconsin Supreme Court, a margin of just under 6,000 votes. Hagedorndeclared victory early Wednesday while Neubauer’s campaign has not conceded and says a recount is likely.

State law allows for a recount if the margin is within 1 percent, as this contest currently is. First, though, county election officials must do a canvass to determine the final tally, a process the Journal-Sentinel says will start next week.

If Hagedorn’s lead holds, he will flip a seat left open by retiring liberal Justice Shirley Abrahamson and give conservatives a 5-2 majority on the bench. While conservatives will have to play defense a year from now, when conservative Dan Kelly is up for election, Hagedorn’s win ensures they’ll retain their majority heading into the next round of redistricting. And that in turn almost certainly means the Wisconsin Supreme Court won’t act as a check on the extreme gerrymanders that Republicans have perpetrated for years.
 
dizzy couldn't work hard enough to make it as a rodbuster, he comes off rather soft . . . all you crybaby snowflakes do. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of hard working people who got fooled by t, just not any of you t-swallowers in here. You guys are the small, soft hand types.


3:38 am.......wow....you’re sure an odd duck along with being a Lemming Liberal....
 
dizzy couldn't work hard enough to make it as a rodbuster, he comes off rather soft . . . all you crybaby snowflakes do. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of hard working people who got fooled by t, just not any of you t-swallowers in here. You guys are the small, soft hand types.
More horseshit from the union "fluffer"...
 
You are the biggest queerbait in.rodbuster ville.
I am sure you were laughed at, just like we do in here.
More projection on your part I see. For you it seems like it's your job to be in here, so on that account I don't laugh at you like I do at the plumber and diz-bot, I just shake my head in disbelief of your manic disposition.
 


Obama Hack Makes Bullsh** Claim That Attorney General Barr is Covering Up for President Trump

Posted at 5:00 pm on April 04, 2019 by streiff


william-barr-620x348.jpg


As I’ve posted on a few occasions, the Democrat strategy, now that the Mueller investigation has reached the same conclusion sane people reached in December 2016, is to convince their base and CNN watchers that the actual REAL real report shows collusion and obstruction of justice. They are doing that by demanding something they probably aren’t going to get, which is the Mueller report with all the actual documentary evidence, and then using the redacted material as evidence of the good stuff being hidden.

To make this plausible, they have to take a GOPe guy and Washington fixture like William Barr and they have to turn him into a super villain. This is how they are going about it. The story is from Politico and headlined The Barr-Shaped Cloud Over the Justice Department, the subtitle is The attorney general has made a total hash of the Mueller report, undermining the very department he runs. The author is Matthew Miller who worked as spokesman for the criminally corrupt Eric Holder.

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/20...torney-general-barr-covering-president-trump/



 
. . . and you? For you there is no hope. You are just a twisted, self-loathing, angry, non-sensical aper of things you don't seem to understand. Sad really.
Self loathing...? HA!
Once again projecting all things you are toward others and working hard to remove all doubt.
You just keep yappin' out your ass duck. It's just fodder for more ridicule.
 

The breathless innuendo is very much in stark contrast to the interview former White House attorney John Dowd gave to Byron York that went live yesterday at Ricochet.com. There is a lot of great stuff in the interview but the most interesting theme is just how closely the White House worked with Mueller’s team to expedite the investigation beneath the surface as a food fight raged overhead.

Here are some highlights.

For public consumption, Trump was denouncing Mueller and trashing his team. Behind the scenes, Trump was cooperating and making sure his staff did the same. The Trump White House offered everyone (except, of course, the president himself) to be interviewed, and reams and reams of documents that other White Houses might have withheld on the grounds of executive or other privilege. So Trump simultaneously attacked and cooperated.

Asked about the attacks, Dowd said Mueller understood that Trump had to mount a political defense on the Russia issue. “Bob understood this, it was political,” Dowd said. ” [Trump] had to handle the political side, and that was his way of doing it with his tweets and his comments … Bob was a big boy about the political side of it. He understood the president had to address the politics of it. He couldn’t just say nothing. People were pounding him about this thing every day, both privately and publicly, and he had to take [Mueller] on.”

Mueller’s only real concern about the president’s rhetoric, Dowd said, was the worry that it might send a message to Trump’s side not to cooperate.

“Early on, when the president started teeing off on Mueller, Mueller indicated to me that he was worried that some people might not cooperate,” Dowd said. “I said, well we’ve encouraged everyone to cooperate, and if you want me to say something publicly about that, and the president, we’re happy to do it. And we did. We encouraged everyone who was asked to cooperate … Bob was satisfied with that. It never came up again.”

In the end, Dowd said, Mueller “acknowledged that all the witnesses told the truth, all the documents were there, there was nothing missing, no documents destroyed.” The level of cooperation, Dowd said, was “truly remarkable,” all while the president distracted the world with his tweets.

Let’s go further in the interview:

In both conversations, Dowd described some of the materials Trump handed over to Mueller. For example, he pointed to the notes of Annie Donaldson, who was White House counsel Don McGahn’s chief of staff. The notes memorialized many White House meetings in which the president discussed the Russia matter with top advisers. They were extensive. Dowd said it took many hours to read through them. Even though Trump could have claimed executive or other privilege to withhold them from Mueller, he instead turned them over to the special counsel’s office.

Why? Dowd explained that fellow Trump lawyer Ty Cobb came up with an idea for the White House to turn over the documents under the terms of an informal understanding with Mueller. The idea was this: Mueller was in the executive branch. The White House was in the executive branch. The White House would hand over the material, one executive branch entity to another, without claiming any privilege, provided Mueller would agree that, if he intended to use the material in any public way, he would first consult the White House.

“It was the idea of Ty Cobb to fashion this so that we could expedite the production of documents and testimony,” Dowd said. “You can imagine what a nightmare it would be to take document by document and assert the privilege, because most of it was within [executive] privilege, and indeed the White House communications privilege. I thought it was a great idea. Ty got Bob’s and [top deputy James] Quarles’ promise that if they needed to use any of it publicly, they would come back to the White House.”

I asked how that might work in an adversarial relationship. After all, Mueller’s staff were prosecutors. They might want to use the material to indict the president (against Justice Department policy but discussed publicly at the time), or to create a road map for Congress to impeach him. How could Trump go along with that? Was that evidence of an extraordinary level of trust?

“It was,” Dowd said. “I would not call it adversarial. That comes when you charge. This was more inquisitorial. Bob was simply investigating, inquiring into certain matters that had been brought to his attention … and there was indeed more trust in our relationship than in any in my entire career.”
 
t is a well documented liar about things large and small, it's what he does. The 2020 question will be, do you still trust him? I never did, but I can see the blaringly obvious. "If someone tells you who they are believe them".
 
Apparently t has punted on 1st down once again moving the closing the border deadline back a year . . . and then changing the terms he seeks to keep it open. Weakest POTUS ever.
 
Back
Top