Bruddah IZ
DA
If moral hazard was minimal, why 5 years of QE?"Moral hazard" was minimal at most, temporary and did little to change landscape.
If moral hazard was minimal, why 5 years of QE?"Moral hazard" was minimal at most, temporary and did little to change landscape.
I actually might agree with that given the article you posted about the market recovery and asset reallocation to bonds. So much for the losses you are alarmed about.Causation of single day market moves are not hard to prove. You can line the info publication up with the moves in, you know, real time.
You know I would not do that, but keep trying.Now you are dissing dizzy?
Oh well looky here. The snopes and fee article guy.
Read your article and youʻll see why sudden temporary drops are due to long inflated equities, via 5 years of QE, being driven down and re-purchased nearer to book values to compete with bonds and their rising interest rates. Bonds looking to be a safer long term bet. Hence your 60% of portfolio cash holdings. A sudden reaction to the announcement but not the singular most important reason for the 5 or 6 temp pull backs in the indexes. Markets are irrational. But then you already knew that.The idea that 5 years of QE "suddenly" tanks a market 15 minutes after China announces retalitory tariffs list is just stupid, end stop. You can dance on the head of all the pins you want, but it doesn't make that claim fit for anyone but a pin-head.
Too bad Bootsie baited the hook for that one. You flashed about in splendor as all mahimahi do before you struck and ran with the hook.One of many times you were exposed for the fraud you are.
Too bad Bootsie baited the hook for that one. You flashed about in splendor as all mahimahi do before you struck and ran with the hook.
Hey, his fan club sucks it up and that's who he's here to impress . . . well, them and himself. No integrity, no shame, just bs.What a superfluous way to describe you lying and being full of shit, again.
Your effort is well documented in the Climate and Weather thread.What a superfluous way to describe you lying and being full of shit, again.
You respond to my post more than they do. You must be impressed.Hey, his fan club sucks it up and that's who he's here to impress . . . well, them and himself. No integrity, no shame, just bs.
I knew there was something about that guy.What a superfluous way to describe you lying and being full of shit, again.
I agree.Too bad she's not the president.
I already told you, finance izn't my forte and that's why I hired Brudda Iz to help me in all my business and finance decisions.
Dummy
If moral hazard was minimal, why 5 years of QE?
Lock her up and deport the Kenyan.They raided Mikey Cohen's office and hotel. HILLARY and OBAMA are GOING TO JAIL!!!!!!!
What incentives did banks and insurance companies have for not using easy credit when Fannie and Freddie were snatching up loans so that banks could rin$e and repeat? And arenʻt you missing Congressʻs affordable housing goals?ie. cost of not enforcing "moral hazard" - ie. banks, insurance, etc. ended up not paying enough, being restructured enough to incentivize them not to overuse easy credit backstopped by taxpayers again. In other words: The bank and insurance co's etc did not feel enough pain of their actions. There should have been more consequence to the big institutions in tandem with any bailout.
I still think there is hope for you.You respond to my post more than they do. You must be impressed.