The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Trump doing the heavy lifting the pussy Kenyan wouldn't.
Trump Agrees To Hold Off On Threatened Tariff Increases; Xi Agrees To Buy ‘Very Substantial’ Amount Of US Products
View attachment 3519

Another rube falls for the con... "But Trump says..."

10% tariffs still on. No formal agreement. 90 day suspension of 25% tariffs... At least we'll have a nice day-trade bounce tomorrow (cause of tax cuts, remember?) Talk to me in March... Kek.


Jim Watson | AFP | Getty Images
Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) waves to the press as he walks with President Donald Trump at the Mar-a-Lago estate in West Palm Beach, Florida, April 7, 2017.
Markets around the world cheered the 90-day ceasefirethat U.S. President Donald Trumpand Chinese President Xi Jinpingagreed on over the weekend, but experts repeatedly expressed doubt that any concrete steps to totally ease tensions between the two economic giants can be achieved in so short a time.

"This is not a truce, this is not an armistice," Steve Okun, senior advisor at McLarty Associates, told CNBC's "Street Signs"on Monday. He noted the additional tariffs that the U.S.and Chinahave imposed on each other's products are still in place, so the 90-day withholding of further levies doesn't signal the end of the trade fight.

"Sure, it's a good sign that presidents talk, it's a good sign that they've set some kind of 90-day period — even though we don't really know what's expected to occur in that 90 days — but the trade war is on," added Okun, a trade expert and a board member of the American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore.

Trump and Xi met at the G-20 summit in Argentinaover the weekend. There, the American president agreed to not raise tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports from 10 percent to 25 percent in January as he had previously threatened, according to a statement from the White House. But, if the two countries fail to reach a deal at the end of 90 days, the threatened tariffs will be implemented, the statement said.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/03/us-...n-despite-trump-xi-90-days-truce-experts.html
 
Another rube falls for the con... "But Trump says..."

10% tariffs still on. No formal agreement. 90 day suspension of 25% tariffs... At least we'll have a nice day-trade bounce tomorrow (cause of tax cuts, remember?) Talk to me in March... Kek.


Jim Watson | AFP | Getty Images
Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) waves to the press as he walks with President Donald Trump at the Mar-a-Lago estate in West Palm Beach, Florida, April 7, 2017.
Markets around the world cheered the 90-day ceasefirethat U.S. President Donald Trumpand Chinese President Xi Jinpingagreed on over the weekend, but experts repeatedly expressed doubt that any concrete steps to totally ease tensions between the two economic giants can be achieved in so short a time.

"This is not a truce, this is not an armistice," Steve Okun, senior advisor at McLarty Associates, told CNBC's "Street Signs"on Monday. He noted the additional tariffs that the U.S.and Chinahave imposed on each other's products are still in place, so the 90-day withholding of further levies doesn't signal the end of the trade fight.

"Sure, it's a good sign that presidents talk, it's a good sign that they've set some kind of 90-day period — even though we don't really know what's expected to occur in that 90 days — but the trade war is on," added Okun, a trade expert and a board member of the American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore.

Trump and Xi met at the G-20 summit in Argentinaover the weekend. There, the American president agreed to not raise tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports from 10 percent to 25 percent in January as he had previously threatened, according to a statement from the White House. But, if the two countries fail to reach a deal at the end of 90 days, the threatened tariffs will be implemented, the statement said.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/03/us-...n-despite-trump-xi-90-days-truce-experts.html
CNBC? You must be kidding.
 
CNBC? You must be kidding.

Hm. The feeling when, because you are racists and can't read, you think Steve Okum is "cnbc ...." Kek.

Ok. How about the WSJ and Nate Taplin? (Who argues Trump blinking here - which he did - lost the leverage he had due to China's flatlining to shrinking factory sector...) BTW, some of the goal of Trump's "trade war" are really important, esp. IP theft. The stupid thing is going around telling people trade wars are "easy to win" then kicking the can down the road with an unenforceable, non-specific agreement. It's just NK all over again: pretend to get concessions. Give concession of your own. Get nothing down the road. Don the Con is not even that good a con.

Or, you can listen to the Pink Elephant of the Sterno Bottle down at Standard Brands...

Trump, Xi: This Isn’t the Deal You’re Looking For
Markets are celebrating a Sino-U.S. trade cease-fire. More-sober investors will recognize an opportunity may have been lost.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-xi-this-isnt-the-deal-youre-looking-for-1543814693?mod=e2tw
 
Like, you all know the tariffs Xi is taking off cars is the one he put on due to Trump's tariffs. The original 15% remains... (and it's just a promise anyway. They same promise he made last year...)

This was Trump blinking. Xi doesn't want a trade war (and never did.) But there are no major concessions in this pause. (Also, most US cars sold to China are made in China...)
 
"When you're attacking the FBI because you're under criminal investigation, you're losing." -- Sarah Huckabee Sanders
 
So good of Don the Con to take credit for putting out the fire he started...

He loves farmers... so he ruined an entire growing season...

Ladies and gentleman- the con.

Oh, and the tax cuts will pay for themselves...
 
Hm. The feeling when, because you are racists and can't read, you think Steve Okum is "cnbc ...." Kek.

Ok. How about the WSJ and Nate Taplin? (Who argues Trump blinking here - which he did - lost the leverage he had due to China's flatlining to shrinking factory sector...) BTW, some of the goal of Trump's "trade war" are really important, esp. IP theft. The stupid thing is going around telling people trade wars are "easy to win" then kicking the can down the road with an unenforceable, non-specific agreement. It's just NK all over again: pretend to get concessions. Give concession of your own. Get nothing down the road. Don the Con is not even that good a con.

Or, you can listen to the Pink Elephant of the Sterno Bottle down at Standard Brands...

Trump, Xi: This Isn’t the Deal You’re Looking For
Markets are celebrating a Sino-U.S. trade cease-fire. More-sober investors will recognize an opportunity may have been lost.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-xi-this-isnt-the-deal-youre-looking-for-1543814693?mod=e2tw
Just interesting the depths you will go to find someone who will agrees with you, besides your husband that iz.
 
Hm. The feeling when, because you are racists and can't read, you think Steve Okum is "cnbc ...." Kek.

Ok. How about the WSJ and Nate Taplin? (Who argues Trump blinking here - which he did - lost the leverage he had due to China's flatlining to shrinking factory sector...) BTW, some of the goal of Trump's "trade war" are really important, esp. IP theft. The stupid thing is going around telling people trade wars are "easy to win" then kicking the can down the road with an unenforceable, non-specific agreement. It's just NK all over again: pretend to get concessions. Give concession of your own. Get nothing down the road. Don the Con is not even that good a con.

Or, you can listen to the Pink Elephant of the Sterno Bottle down at Standard Brands...

Trump, Xi: This Isn’t the Deal You’re Looking For
Markets are celebrating a Sino-U.S. trade cease-fire. More-sober investors will recognize an opportunity may have been lost.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-xi-this-isnt-the-deal-youre-looking-for-1543814693?mod=e2tw
The wall street urinal?
You have got to be kidding, it's not even good enough to line a bird cage.
 
"When you're attacking the FBI because you're under criminal investigation, you're losing." -- Sarah Huckabee Sanders
th


SPRINGSTEEN: I don't see anyone who can beat Trump...

Sanders eyes 'bigger' 2020 bid despite warning signs...

Iowa Dems Want Generational Change...

KAMALA: 'It's going to be ugly'...
th


DOWD: Curtains for Clintons...
 
Add to that, someone comes in and plays on your racial anxieties, and blames an enormous amount of this on the "other" from the southern side of the border, and you're going to have an audience for those views,' Springsteen told the magazine.
Add to that, someone comes in and plays on your racial anxieties, and blames an enormous amount of this on the "other" from the southern side of the border, and you're going to have an audience for those views,' Springsteen told the magazine.
 
Add to that, someone comes in and plays on your racial anxieties, and blames an enormous amount of this on the "other" from the southern side of the border, and you're going to have an audience for those views,' Springsteen told the magazine.


Add to that, someone comes in and plays on your racial anxieties, and blames an enormous amount of this on the "other" from the southern side of the border, and you're going to have an audience for those views,' Springsteen told the magazine.
Trust me, it wasn't that good the first time.

Yep, those pesky laws getting in the way of progress.
I am still hoping my bounty program is implemented.
$5.00 per left ear of any adult illegal alien in the USA.
 
The wall street urinal?
You have got to be kidding, it's not even good enough to line a bird cage.

Have someone read it to you, Racist Joe. Just ask them to go. very. slowly. And before you use it under your day-job primer. It. is. easier. to. read. that. way.

Love

Friesland
 
Have you seen the Dow today?

Did you see my post that it was going to be a big day... cause of tax cuts! lol... oh wait. Cause of QE3! ... oh wait.

Wanna bet on the dow for 12 months going forward? Over/under is 7%. We can bet our favorite off-brand linseed oil! Or, we can get a nice craft-brewed can of stereo for you.
 
George Conway?
You keep quoting less than credible sources.

Yeah... former Solicitor General married to Trump's spokesperson is "less than credible..." (that's not a guy in the Army, Racist Joe.) I didn't think it was possible, but you continue to shock with your ignorance. I guess they're right, sterno does kill brain cells - or cell in your case.

Anyway, set your clocks. Roger Stone's live testimony in front of the House in Jan gonna be LIT!
 
Another rube falls for the con... "But Trump says..."

10% tariffs still on. No formal agreement. 90 day suspension of 25% tariffs... At least we'll have a nice day-trade bounce tomorrow (cause of tax cuts, remember?) Talk to me in March... Kek.


Jim Watson | AFP | Getty Images
Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) waves to the press as he walks with President Donald Trump at the Mar-a-Lago estate in West Palm Beach, Florida, April 7, 2017.
Markets around the world cheered the 90-day ceasefirethat U.S. President Donald Trumpand Chinese President Xi Jinpingagreed on over the weekend, but experts repeatedly expressed doubt that any concrete steps to totally ease tensions between the two economic giants can be achieved in so short a time.

"This is not a truce, this is not an armistice," Steve Okun, senior advisor at McLarty Associates, told CNBC's "Street Signs"on Monday. He noted the additional tariffs that the U.S.and Chinahave imposed on each other's products are still in place, so the 90-day withholding of further levies doesn't signal the end of the trade fight.

"Sure, it's a good sign that presidents talk, it's a good sign that they've set some kind of 90-day period — even though we don't really know what's expected to occur in that 90 days — but the trade war is on," added Okun, a trade expert and a board member of the American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore.

Trump and Xi met at the G-20 summit in Argentinaover the weekend. There, the American president agreed to not raise tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports from 10 percent to 25 percent in January as he had previously threatened, according to a statement from the White House. But, if the two countries fail to reach a deal at the end of 90 days, the threatened tariffs will be implemented, the statement said.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/03/us-...n-despite-trump-xi-90-days-truce-experts.html
Frienance, I can just see you standing next to the QE spigot waiting for your orders from the Keynesian Con men.
 
Hm. The feeling when, because you are racists and can't read, you think Steve Okum is "cnbc ...." Kek.

Ok. How about the WSJ and Nate Taplin? (Who argues Trump blinking here - which he did - lost the leverage he had due to China's flatlining to shrinking factory sector...) BTW, some of the goal of Trump's "trade war" are really important, esp. IP theft. The stupid thing is going around telling people trade wars are "easy to win" then kicking the can down the road with an unenforceable, non-specific agreement. It's just NK all over again: pretend to get concessions. Give concession of your own. Get nothing down the road. Don the Con is not even that good a con.

Or, you can listen to the Pink Elephant of the Sterno Bottle down at Standard Brands...

Trump, Xi: This Isn’t the Deal You’re Looking For
Markets are celebrating a Sino-U.S. trade cease-fire. More-sober investors will recognize an opportunity may have been lost.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-xi-this-isnt-the-deal-youre-looking-for-1543814693?mod=e2tw
Trump lost leverage because of China's shrinking factory sector? What non-specific agreement isn't unenforceable? What concessions were really given? Stand by at your QE spigot.
 
Back
Top