The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Ricky Fandango said:
How many men have never been slapped by a woman?
Click to expand...

Me (unless she slapped me so hard that I forgot it).

In my high school and college years, I recall being surprised at how eager girls were to do the same things boys wanted to do - up to a point. When she said "no" or pushed me away, I took that as a limit and respected it. Slapping me was not necessary for me to get the point.

How about you?
 
espola said:
Me (unless she slapped me so hard that I forgot it).

In my high school and college years, I recall being surprised at how eager girls were to do the same things boys wanted to do - up to a point. When she said "no" or pushed me away, I took that as a limit and respected it. Slapping me was not necessary for me to get the point.

How about you?
Click to expand...
He said men. Dummy.
 
afb100518dAPR20181005034508.jpg
 
Sheriff Joe said:
I doubt there are any straight men on the planet that haven't groped a woman or 2, that's how this works, you don't know until you try.
Behar: GOP Tells Boys ‘Allowed to Grope a Woman’
Click to expand...
You have a da
Sheriff Joe said:
He said men. Dummy.
Click to expand...
What kind of low life piece of shit makes fun of a woman who could have potentially been assaulted? A "man" wouldn't do that. If either of my boys did that to a woman I would call the police. Oh wait....The man in charge doesn't give a rats ass so why should anyone else. MAGA!
 
Chizl said:
You have a da

What kind of low life piece of shit makes fun of a woman who could have potentially been assaulted? A "man" wouldn't do that. If either of my boys did that to a woman I would call the police. Oh wait....The man in charge doesn't give a rats ass so why should anyone else. MAGA!
Click to expand...
He didn't make fun of her, he just pointed at the facts of the case, she has been caught and everyone knows it.
Why do you think her lawyer refused to give her shrinks notes to the committee?
Why did she hire a lawyer before her letter was sent?
She is a lying wretch.
Aren't you just a little concerned about the timing of Ford and co?
The day after the hearings?
 
Sheriff Joe said:
He didn't make fun of her, he just pointed at the facts of the case, she has been caught and everyone knows it.
Why do you think her lawyer refused to give her shrinks notes to the committee?
Why did she hire a lawyer before her letter was sent?
She is a lying wretch.
Aren't you just a little concerned about the timing of Ford and co?
The day after the hearings?
Click to expand...

He was commenting on YOU making fun of her.
 
espola said:
He was commenting on YOU making fun of her.
Click to expand...
Correct Espola.

Is she really lying low life? Maybe she is. But what I don't understand is what her gain in this situation? How does she benefit from this? Tools like you are going to make her life hell moving forward. If it is true then K gets what he deserves. Won't ever know with the limited FBI investigation around these charges. Seem right to you scum?

The only thing a "man" should be in this case is respectful. Something you know nothing about not does your boy T.
 
Chizl said:
Correct Espola.

Is she really lying low life? Maybe she is. But what I don't understand is what her gain in this situation? How does she benefit from this? Tools like you are going to make her life hell moving forward. If it is true then K gets what he deserves. Won't ever know with the limited FBI investigation around these charges. Seem right to you scum?

The only thing a "man" should be in this case is respectful. Something you know nothing about not does your boy T.
Click to expand...
What about kavanaugh? What does he get if he didn't do it, you fascist fuck.
Have you seen her gofundmyslutass website?
 
Chizl said:
Correct Espola.

Is she really lying low life? Maybe she is. But what I don't understand is what her gain in this situation? How does she benefit from this? Tools like you are going to make her life hell moving forward. If it is true then K gets what he deserves. Won't ever know with the limited FBI investigation around these charges. Seem right to you scum?

The only thing a "man" should be in this case is respectful. Something you know nothing about not does your boy T.
Click to expand...
I know people like you don't take facts into consideration when you drag someones' good name through the mud just for political reason, but take a look if you dare.
LOCK HER UP!


Let's review the evidence that potentially points toward something sinister:

1) Leland Keyser, the (former, I'm assuming) friend of Christine Ford who denied ever attending the party she described or even knowing Brett Kavanaugh at all, now reports that she was pressured to change, or "revisit," her testimony. Who allegedly did the pressuring? None other than Monica McLean, the retired FBI agent and friend of Ford who, according to Ford's ex-boyfriend, had been coached by Ford on how to pass a lie detector test. When the ex-boyfriend initially told that story, it was assumed that McLean was just a random friend. Now we find out that she has been deeply involved this whole time.

2) Christine Ford has refused to turn over her therapy notes or any of the documentation from her polygraph test. If she is telling the truth, these materials would be enormously important evidence in her favor. If she is not telling the truth, these materials might destroy her case and, at a minimum, open her up to perjury charges. The fact that she will not turn over the evidence seems to indicate that it falls into the latter category, not the former.

3) There is still a lot of confusion surrounding the way in which these allegations were first reported and then made public. Democrats knew about Ford for several weeks yet kept it secret. What were they doing in the meantime? Why did they wait so long? How much communication was there between Ford and Democrats? What was the content of that communication? The secrecy is suspicious and should be explored by federal investigators.

4) Chuck Grassley sent a letter to Ford's attorney last night, asking for the third time that any relevant documents be turned over. The last paragraph of his letter is very interesting:

I urge you once again, now for the third time in writing, to turn over the therapy notes, polygraph materials, and communications with The Washington Post that Dr. Ford has relied upon as evidence. In addition to the evidence I requested in my October 2 letter, in light of recently uncovered information, please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following: (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono, other than your communications with me and my staff in preparation for the September 27 hearings; (2) the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford (Leland Keyser, Mark Judge, and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth); and (3) Debbie Ramirez, Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.

This follows the same line of questioning explored by the prosector at the hearing last week. It would seem that the Republicans have strong reasons to suspect that these various different parties coordinated behind the scenes. Again, what was the nature of that coordination? Why did they coordinate or communicate at all? Why would an honest woman with truthful allegations need to have any conversations whatsoever with the political opposition of the man she is accusing? And why would she need to speak with the other accusers? We know now that someone close to Ford put pressure on Leland Kesyer; what about the other witnesses? And who instructed McLean to make that call?

There are many crucial questions that must still be answered. Kavanaugh has been thoroughly exonerated, but Ford, her team, and Senate Democrats should now come under the microscope. Coordinated smear campaigns destroy innocent lives and undermine our system of government. A CNN analyst said yesterday that this is all "just politics." No, it's a lot more than that. If this was a calculated effort to lie, slander, and perjure — which is certainly how it looks — then it is not "politics" but a crime, and everyone involved should spend the next several years in a prison cell.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top