The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Bruddah IZ said:
Has anyone in the caravan explained why they are marching with the Honduran flag?
Click to expand...

If this is not stopped and turned around, you will have every thing needed to create a
CIVIL WAR flash point at the Border !

This is no joke !

And now you Liberal posters who scoffed at me two years ago will see what the
Liberal Military was planning for...." Jade Helm "

The size of these Caravans is growing exponentially with each passing day, as if
there are LARGE pockets of ILLEGAL MIGRANTS staged along these routes !!!

What happens if the Cartel decides to covertly arm all the Military aged Males
just before the border as they depart the covert midnight buses that will transport
them to the border before the election. You see they cannot make it to the border
before Nov 6th without outside help.
The Gulf route is approx 1633 miles up to Texas, at 40 miles ( average distance at
walking ) a day that's 40.8 days.
The California route puts them thru central Mexico at approx 3050 miles, at 40
miles a day that's 76.5 days.
If Mexican Tourist buses are employed that seat about 60, then you need about
200 - 235 buses for approx 7500...at 80 mph they are there in 17.5 or so hours...

The Democrats are pure evil in their intent anymore.....and we know now how
they operate by what they did to Judge Brett Kavanaugh....
 
ee1183ca3de512fcb49ed7630ab182a1
 
Palestinian Teen Terrorist Indicted for Murdering American Ari Fuld
44EmailGoogle+Twitter

murdered-640x480.png

Supplied
23 Oct 2018105

0:54
The Times of Israel reports: Prosecutors filed an indictment Monday against a Palestinian teen who stabbed to death an Israeli-American father of four outside a West Bank supermarket last month, the army said.
Khalil Jabarin was charged at a West Bank military court with intentionally causing death — the military court’s equivalent of murder — along with a number of lesser charges, in the killing of Ari Fuld on September 16.



The full indictment was placed under a gag order by the military court. Jabarin, 16, has been in custody since the terror attack, in which he stabbed Fuld repeatedly outside a supermarket in the central West Bank’s Gush Etzion Junction, before being shot and arrested.
 
Texas Democratic Party sending out voter registration applications to dead people, non-US citizens
2 hours
texas-voter-registrations-1280x720.jpg

The Texas Democratic Party is sending out voter applications — to the deceased and to people who are not U.S. citizens. (Image source: KTVT-TV video screenshot)



The Texas Democratic Party has been sending out official voter registration applications to people who have been dead for years, sometimes decades, according to KTVT-TV. State government officials said they’ve also received complaints of applications being sent to non-citizens.

The voter registration applications included a stamped return envelope addressed to the Texas Secretary of State.


What?
Ola Allen of Dallas was affected by the party’s indiscretion. She said she received a voter registration application in the mail for her husband, who has been dead for almost three years. Shortly after, she received a voter registration application for her mother — who also died, just about two years ago.
Allen chalked up the voter registration applications to a simple oversight, since her husband and mother died in relatively recent years.
Then she received a voter registration application for her daughter, who was just 21 years old when she passed away — in 1989.

“I just said, ‘This can’t be real,” Allen told KTVT, and said that this application — her third — was nothing short of upsetting. “I just set it down because I lost it. I really lost it.”

Allen added, “My daughter has been gone 20-plus years and this doesn’t do a thing but open up an old wound for me.”

Allen told the station that she wasn’t necessarily concerned about voter fraud when she received the applications for her deceased family.

What she is concerned about is the state of political affairs in the United States.

“‘Any means that it takes to get to the top, that’s what I am going to do.’ That’s what this tells me,” Allen said of the applications. “I just hope whoever sends these out will think about what they are doing.”

Has there been a response?
A spokesperson for the Texas Democratic Party said that the application mailers were part of an “unprecedented investment to provide eligible Texans with the opportunity to vote.”
 
Trump tariffs lead to bleak 2019 farm forecasts

The Agriculture Department’s Economic Research Service has estimated that 2018 net farm income will be $9.8 billion, or 13 percent, lower than the year before. Adjusting for inflation, farm income is barely above the lowest level since 2002. If current trends continue, some agriculture economists predict that farm income will fall again in 2019.

Trade aid vs. suppressed demand

Although many farmers aren’t vocally blaming Trump for their woes, the trade war has both direct and indirect effects on agriculture. Steel and aluminum duties levied on imports from China as well as other trading partners like Canada have bumped up the cost of farm equipment, while tariffs on Chinese chemicals have raised prices on pesticides and herbicides.

USDA’s recent trade aid package provides some respite, but it will not address the broader challenges. Several sectors of the farm economy also complain that the $12 billion trade assistance program will give meager relief from retaliatory tariffs.

The department is set to announce plans for a second round of trade aid around early December, but the Agriculture secretary has repeatedly stressed the cash payments are intended to just be a temporary, one-year stopgap.

Gordon called the program a “Band-Aid on an arterial bleed.”

The biggest factor taking aim at farm incomes has to do with supply and demand economics. Commodity prices have plummeted since spring, when China was gearing up to slap 25 percent duties on U.S. agricultural goods like soybeans in retaliation for Trump’s tariffs on Chinese high-tech products.

Ken Morrison, an agriculture commodities market expert, said China is unlikely to back down over Trump’s trade demands on issues like intellectual property and technology transfers. Like other trade experts and market watchers, Morrison thinks retaliatory tariffs are here to stay.

“I spent four years in China, long enough to know not to underestimate their willingness to endure economic pain, especially when their sovereign goals are threatened,” he said.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/23/trump-tariffs-farmers-agriculture-866450

Put an Idiot in the White House - what could go wrong?
 
Booter said:
Trump tariffs lead to bleak 2019 farm forecasts

The Agriculture Department’s Economic Research Service has estimated that 2018 net farm income will be $9.8 billion, or 13 percent, lower than the year before. Adjusting for inflation, farm income is barely above the lowest level since 2002. If current trends continue, some agriculture economists predict that farm income will fall again in 2019.

Trade aid vs. suppressed demand

Although many farmers aren’t vocally blaming Trump for their woes, the trade war has both direct and indirect effects on agriculture. Steel and aluminum duties levied on imports from China as well as other trading partners like Canada have bumped up the cost of farm equipment, while tariffs on Chinese chemicals have raised prices on pesticides and herbicides.

USDA’s recent trade aid package provides some respite, but it will not address the broader challenges. Several sectors of the farm economy also complain that the $12 billion trade assistance program will give meager relief from retaliatory tariffs.

The department is set to announce plans for a second round of trade aid around early December, but the Agriculture secretary has repeatedly stressed the cash payments are intended to just be a temporary, one-year stopgap.

Gordon called the program a “Band-Aid on an arterial bleed.”

The biggest factor taking aim at farm incomes has to do with supply and demand economics. Commodity prices have plummeted since spring, when China was gearing up to slap 25 percent duties on U.S. agricultural goods like soybeans in retaliation for Trump’s tariffs on Chinese high-tech products.

Ken Morrison, an agriculture commodities market expert, said China is unlikely to back down over Trump’s trade demands on issues like intellectual property and technology transfers. Like other trade experts and market watchers, Morrison thinks retaliatory tariffs are here to stay.

“I spent four years in China, long enough to know not to underestimate their willingness to endure economic pain, especially when their sovereign goals are threatened,” he said.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/23/trump-tariffs-farmers-agriculture-866450

Put an Idiot in the White House - what could go wrong?
Click to expand...
You must not have listened to Trump in Texas last night.
 
Fake News putting words in the President's mouth,
CNN's Jim Acosta 'Asks' Trump: 'You're a White Nationalist'

pTBoqzcU-720.jpg

JUSTIN CARUSO 23 Oct 2018


President Donald Trump defined nationalism for CNN reporter Jim Acosta in the White House Tuesday, saying that he’s “so proud of our country.”


“Mr. President, just to follow up on your comments about being a nationalist–there is a concern that you are sending coded language or a dog whistle to some Americans out there that what you really mean is that you’re a white nationalist?” Jim Acosta asked in the Oval Office.

“I’ve never even heard that, I can’t imagine that,” Trump said. “I’ve never heard that theory about being a nationalist.”

Trump also said, “I am very proud of our country. We cannot continue to allow what’s happened to our country to continue happening. We can’t let it happen. So I’m proud. I’m proud of our country, and I am a nationalist. It’s a word that hasn’t been used too much. Some people use it, but I’m very proud. I think it should be brought back.”

“All I want our country is to be treated well, to be treated with respect. For many years, other countries that are allies of ours–so-called allies–they have not treated our country fairly. So in that sense, I am absolutely a nationalist, and I’m proud of it,” the president also told Acosta.


This question comes after Trump enthusiastically called himself a “nationalist” at a rally in Texas Monday.

“A globalist is a person that wants the globe to do well, frankly, not caring about our country so much,” the president said.

“You know what I am? I’m a nationalist. Okay? A nationalist. Use that word.”

Acosta, as usual, took to his Twitter to recap what just happened for his followers.

“I also asked Trump about the ‘nationalist’ label he has given himself. He brushed off the notion that this means he is a ‘white nationalist,'” he said in part.



 
Booter said:
Trump tariffs lead to bleak 2019 farm forecasts

The Agriculture Department’s Economic Research Service has estimated that 2018 net farm income will be $9.8 billion, or 13 percent, lower than the year before. Adjusting for inflation, farm income is barely above the lowest level since 2002. If current trends continue, some agriculture economists predict that farm income will fall again in 2019.

Trade aid vs. suppressed demand

Although many farmers aren’t vocally blaming Trump for their woes, the trade war has both direct and indirect effects on agriculture. Steel and aluminum duties levied on imports from China as well as other trading partners like Canada have bumped up the cost of farm equipment, while tariffs on Chinese chemicals have raised prices on pesticides and herbicides.

USDA’s recent trade aid package provides some respite, but it will not address the broader challenges. Several sectors of the farm economy also complain that the $12 billion trade assistance program will give meager relief from retaliatory tariffs.

The department is set to announce plans for a second round of trade aid around early December, but the Agriculture secretary has repeatedly stressed the cash payments are intended to just be a temporary, one-year stopgap.

Gordon called the program a “Band-Aid on an arterial bleed.”

The biggest factor taking aim at farm incomes has to do with supply and demand economics. Commodity prices have plummeted since spring, when China was gearing up to slap 25 percent duties on U.S. agricultural goods like soybeans in retaliation for Trump’s tariffs on Chinese high-tech products.

Ken Morrison, an agriculture commodities market expert, said China is unlikely to back down over Trump’s trade demands on issues like intellectual property and technology transfers. Like other trade experts and market watchers, Morrison thinks retaliatory tariffs are here to stay.

“I spent four years in China, long enough to know not to underestimate their willingness to endure economic pain, especially when their sovereign goals are threatened,” he said.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/23/trump-tariffs-farmers-agriculture-866450

Put an Idiot in the White House - what could go wrong?
Click to expand...

Trump ruins our Farmer's International Markets with his tariffs and then wants to give the Farmers $18 Billion in aid. Izzy you are right we are becoming Venezuela.
 
Booter said:
Trump tariffs lead to bleak 2019 farm forecasts

The Agriculture Department’s Economic Research Service has estimated that 2018 net farm income will be $9.8 billion, or 13 percent, lower than the year before. Adjusting for inflation, farm income is barely above the lowest level since 2002. If current trends continue, some agriculture economists predict that farm income will fall again in 2019.

Trade aid vs. suppressed demand

Although many farmers aren’t vocally blaming Trump for their woes, the trade war has both direct and indirect effects on agriculture. Steel and aluminum duties levied on imports from China as well as other trading partners like Canada have bumped up the cost of farm equipment, while tariffs on Chinese chemicals have raised prices on pesticides and herbicides.

USDA’s recent trade aid package provides some respite, but it will not address the broader challenges. Several sectors of the farm economy also complain that the $12 billion trade assistance program will give meager relief from retaliatory tariffs.

The department is set to announce plans for a second round of trade aid around early December, but the Agriculture secretary has repeatedly stressed the cash payments are intended to just be a temporary, one-year stopgap.

Gordon called the program a “Band-Aid on an arterial bleed.”

The biggest factor taking aim at farm incomes has to do with supply and demand economics. Commodity prices have plummeted since spring, when China was gearing up to slap 25 percent duties on U.S. agricultural goods like soybeans in retaliation for Trump’s tariffs on Chinese high-tech products.

Ken Morrison, an agriculture commodities market expert, said China is unlikely to back down over Trump’s trade demands on issues like intellectual property and technology transfers. Like other trade experts and market watchers, Morrison thinks retaliatory tariffs are here to stay.

“I spent four years in China, long enough to know not to underestimate their willingness to endure economic pain, especially when their sovereign goals are threatened,” he said.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/23/trump-tariffs-farmers-agriculture-866450

Put an Idiot in the White House - what could go wrong?
Click to expand...
But you people love taxes and QE. Why wouldnʻt you love Tariffs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top